Paper · 2002 · Journal of the Maharashtra Agricultural Universities

Effect of different levels of N,P and K fertigation on yield and quality of Pomegranate

N. N. Firake; D.B. Kumbhar

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
14
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The results revealed that the yield obtained (11.88 t ha-1) due to 100% NPK of recommended dose of solid soluble fertilizers through drip was significantly superior over 100% R.D. of conventional fertilizers and was at per with 70% N, 80% P and K and 70% NPK. Thus the maximum fertilizer saving N, P and K was 30% each when compared with conventional fertilizers. The yield contributing parameters were significantly influenced by different levels of solid soluble fertilizers over conventional application. The juice quality and organopaptic evaluation for colour and taste of pomegranate were not significantly influenced by fertigation levels.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Full recommended NPK through drip produced 11.88 t ha-1 yield and was significantly superior to conventional fertilizer.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
100% NPK of recommended dose of solid soluble fertilizers through dripe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
superiore0
Value
11.88 t ha-1e0
Comparator
100% R.D. of conventional fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield obtained (11.88 t ha-1) due to 100% NPK of recommended dose of solid soluble fertilizers through drip was significantly superior over 100% R.D. of conventional fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 26–207 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full recommended NPK through drip was on par with reduced NPK fertigation for yield.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
100% NPK of recommended dose of solid soluble fertilizers through dripe1
Outcome
yielde1
Comparator
70% N, 80% P and K and 70% NPKe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was at per with 70% N, 80% P and K and 70% NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–258 · show in text ↑
e1

“the yield obtained (11.88 t ha-1) due to 100% NPK of recommended dose of solid soluble fertilizers through drip”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 26–137 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reduced fertigation options allowed 30% savings for each fertilizer nutrient versus conventional fertilizers.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Outcome
fertilizer saving N, P and Ke0
Direction
savinge0
Value
30%e0
Comparator
conventional fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum fertilizer saving N, P and K was 30% each when compared with conventional fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–362 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertigation levels significantly influenced yield contributing parameters relative to conventional application.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
different levels of solid soluble fertilizerse0
Outcome
yield contributing parameterse0
Comparator
conventional applicatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield contributing parameters were significantly influenced by different levels of solid soluble fertilizers over conventional application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–506 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertigation levels did not significantly influence pomegranate juice quality or colour and taste evaluations.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
fertigation levelse0
Outcome
juice quality and organopaptic evaluation for colour and tastee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The juice quality and organopaptic evaluation for colour and taste of pomegranate were not significantly influenced by fertigation levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–645 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

irrigation · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 26 positive, 8 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

fertilization · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 38 positive, 2 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.