Abstract
The results revealed that the yield obtained (11.88 t ha-1) due to 100% NPK of recommended dose of solid soluble fertilizers through drip was significantly superior over 100% R.D. of conventional fertilizers and was at per with 70% N, 80% P and K and 70% NPK. Thus the maximum fertilizer saving N, P and K was 30% each when compared with conventional fertilizers. The yield contributing parameters were significantly influenced by different levels of solid soluble fertilizers over conventional application. The juice quality and organopaptic evaluation for colour and taste of pomegranate were not significantly influenced by fertigation levels.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Full recommended NPK through drip produced 11.88 t ha-1 yield and was significantly superior to conventional fertilizer.
- Taxon
- Pomegranate
Punica granatumt0
- Treatment
- 100% NPK of recommended dose of solid soluble fertilizers through dripe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Value
- 11.88 t ha-1e0
- Comparator
- 100% R.D. of conventional fertilizerse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the yield obtained (11.88 t ha-1) due to 100% NPK of recommended dose of solid soluble fertilizers through drip was significantly superior over 100% R.D. of conventional fertilizers”
t0“Pomegranate”
Claim · model-written summary
Full recommended NPK through drip was on par with reduced NPK fertigation for yield.
- Taxon
- Pomegranate
Punica granatumt0
- Treatment
- 100% NPK of recommended dose of solid soluble fertilizers through dripe1
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Comparator
- 70% N, 80% P and K and 70% NPKe0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“was at per with 70% N, 80% P and K and 70% NPK”
e1“the yield obtained (11.88 t ha-1) due to 100% NPK of recommended dose of solid soluble fertilizers through drip”
t0“Pomegranate”
Claim · model-written summary
The reduced fertigation options allowed 30% savings for each fertilizer nutrient versus conventional fertilizers.
- Taxon
- Pomegranate
Punica granatumt0
- Outcome
- fertilizer saving N, P and Ke0
- Direction
- savinge0
- Value
- 30%e0
- Comparator
- conventional fertilizerse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maximum fertilizer saving N, P and K was 30% each when compared with conventional fertilizers”
t0“Pomegranate”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertigation levels significantly influenced yield contributing parameters relative to conventional application.
- Taxon
- Pomegranate
Punica granatumt0
- Treatment
- different levels of solid soluble fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- yield contributing parameterse0
- Comparator
- conventional applicatione0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The yield contributing parameters were significantly influenced by different levels of solid soluble fertilizers over conventional application”
t0“Pomegranate”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertigation levels did not significantly influence pomegranate juice quality or colour and taste evaluations.
- Taxon
- pomegranate
Punica granatume0
- Treatment
- fertigation levelse0
- Outcome
- juice quality and organopaptic evaluation for colour and tastee0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The juice quality and organopaptic evaluation for colour and taste of pomegranate were not significantly influenced by fertigation levels”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · quality: postharvest · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results
6 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →irrigation · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results
25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
30 papers more in this group
See all 34 papers →fertilization · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results
37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.