Abstract
Field experiment was conducted in semi-arid western India for three consecutive years (2008-2010) to study the response of drip fertigation on yield, quality and economics of pomegranate. The experiment was laid out in a randomized block design with seven treatments replicated three times. The experiment comprised of 100, 80 and 60 % water soluble fertilizers applied through drip in 20 equal weekly splits and results were compared with four control treatments. The study indicated the beneficial effects of drip irrigation in terms of 23.5 % increase in yield and 48.6 % water saving whereas drip with fertigation resulted into 40 to 61 % increase in pomegranate yield as compared to conventional method. The 100 % recommended dose of fertilizer through drip in 20 weekly splits showed 61 % increase in yield (14.6 t ha-1). However, it was on par with 80 % fertigation treatment (13.7 t ha-1). The pomegranate fruit yield obtained under 60 % fertigation (12.6 t ha-1) produced 38.9 % more yield as compared to farmer’s practice (9.05 t ha-1) indicating 40 % fertilizer saving due to fertigation. Maximum water use efficiency (79 kg ha-1mm-1) was obtained in 100 % fertigation. The fertigation resulted into B:C ratio in pomegranate in spite of very high market prices of water soluble fertilizers. The maximum net seasonal income (Rs. 475758 ha-1), total net income (Rs. 922546), net extra income over conventional method (Rs. 217984 ha-1) and maximum water productivity (Rs. 4607 mm-1 of water) were obtained in 100 % fertigation however all the economical parameters were on par with 80% fertigation applied in 20 equal weekly splits.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Drip irrigation increased pomegranate yield by 23.5 %.
- Taxon
- Pomegranate
Punica granatumt0
- Treatment
- drip irrigatione0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 23.5 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“beneficial effects of drip irrigation in terms of 23.5 % increase in yield”
t0“Pomegranate”
Claim · model-written summary
Drip irrigation saved 48.6 % water.
- Taxon
- Pomegranate
Punica granatumt0
- Treatment
- drip irrigatione0
- Outcome
- water savinge0
- Direction
- savinge0
- Value
- 48.6 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“drip irrigation in terms of 23.5 % increase in yield and 48.6 % water saving”
t0“Pomegranate”
Claim · model-written summary
Drip fertigation increased pomegranate yield by 40 to 61 % versus conventional practice.
- Taxon
- pomegranate
Punica granatume0
- Treatment
- drip with fertigatione0
- Outcome
- pomegranate yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 40 to 61 %e0
- Comparator
- conventional methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“drip with fertigation resulted into 40 to 61 % increase in pomegranate yield as compared to conventional method”
Claim · model-written summary
Full-dose drip fertigation increased yield 61 % to 14.6 t ha-1.
- Taxon
- Pomegranate
Punica granatumt0
- Treatment
- 100 % recommended dose of fertilizer through drip in 20 weekly splitse0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 61 %e0
- Qualifier
- 14.6 t ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The 100 % recommended dose of fertilizer through drip in 20 weekly splits showed 61 % increase in yield (14.6 t ha-1)”
t0“Pomegranate”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield under full-dose fertigation was on par with 80 % fertigation, which yielded 13.7 t ha-1.
- Taxon
- Pomegranate
Punica granatumt0
- Treatment
- 80 % fertigation treatmente0
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- on pare0
- Value
- 13.7 t ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“it was on par with 80 % fertigation treatment (13.7 t ha-1)”
e1“61 % increase in yield (14.6 t ha-1)”
t0“Pomegranate”
Claim · model-written summary
At 60 % fertigation, fruit yield was 12.6 t ha-1 and 38.9 % above farmer practice.
- Taxon
- pomegranate
Punica granatume0
- Treatment
- 60 % fertigatione0
- Outcome
- fruit yielde0
- Direction
- moree0
- Value
- 38.9 %e0
- Qualifier
- 12.6 t ha-1e0
- Comparator
- farmer’s practicee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The pomegranate fruit yield obtained under 60 % fertigation (12.6 t ha-1) produced 38.9 % more yield as compared to farmer’s practice (9.05 t ha-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
The 60 % fertigation treatment saved 40 % fertilizer.
- Taxon
- Pomegranate
Punica granatumt0
- Treatment
- fertigatione0
- Outcome
- fertilizer savinge0
- Direction
- savinge0
- Value
- 40 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“40 % fertilizer saving due to fertigation”
t0“Pomegranate”
Claim · model-written summary
Full fertigation gave maximum water use efficiency of 79 kg ha-1mm-1.
- Taxon
- Pomegranate
Punica granatumt0
- Treatment
- 100 % fertigatione0
- Outcome
- water use efficiencye0
- Direction
- Maximume0
- Value
- 79 kg ha-1mm-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maximum water use efficiency (79 kg ha-1mm-1) was obtained in 100 % fertigation”
t0“Pomegranate”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertigation yielded a B:C ratio despite expensive soluble fertilizers.
- Taxon
- Pomegranate
Punica granatumt0
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe0
- Qualifier
- very high market prices of water soluble fertilizerse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The fertigation resulted into B:C ratio in pomegranate in spite of very high market prices of water soluble fertilizers”
t0“Pomegranate”
Claim · model-written summary
Full fertigation gave maximum net seasonal income of Rs. 475758 ha-1.
- Taxon
- Pomegranate
Punica granatumt0
- Treatment
- 100 % fertigatione1
- Outcome
- net seasonal incomee0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- Rs. 475758 ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum net seasonal income (Rs. 475758 ha-1)”
e1“were obtained in 100 % fertigation however”
t0“Pomegranate”
Claim · model-written summary
Full fertigation gave total net income of Rs. 922546.
- Taxon
- Pomegranate
Punica granatumt0
- Outcome
- total net incomee0
- Value
- Rs. 922546e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“total net income (Rs. 922546)”
t0“Pomegranate”
Claim · model-written summary
Full fertigation gave Rs. 217984 ha-1 extra income versus conventional practice.
- Taxon
- Pomegranate
Punica granatumt0
- Outcome
- net extra incomee0
- Value
- Rs. 217984 ha-1e0
- Comparator
- conventional methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“net extra income over conventional method (Rs. 217984 ha-1)”
t0“Pomegranate”
Claim · model-written summary
Full fertigation gave maximum water productivity of Rs. 4607 mm-1 of water.
- Taxon
- Pomegranate
Punica granatumt0
- Outcome
- water productivitye0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- Rs. 4607 mm-1 of watere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maximum water productivity (Rs. 4607 mm-1 of water)”
t0“Pomegranate”
Claim · model-written summary
Economic parameters under full fertigation were on par with 80% fertigation.
- Taxon
- Pomegranate
Punica granatumt0
- Treatment
- 80% fertigation applied in 20 equal weekly splitse0
- Outcome
- economical parameterse0
- Direction
- on pare0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“all the economical parameters were on par with 80% fertigation applied in 20 equal weekly splits”
t0“Pomegranate”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results
25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
30 papers more in this group
See all 34 papers →fertilization · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results
37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →fertilization · physiology: water · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.