Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Productivity, Water Use, Quality and Economics of Pomegranate Fertigation in Semiarid Conditions of India

D. D. Pawar; S. K. Dingre

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiment was conducted in semi-arid western India for three consecutive years (2008-2010) to study the response of drip fertigation on yield, quality and economics of pomegranate. The experiment was laid out in a randomized block design with seven treatments replicated three times. The experiment comprised of 100, 80 and 60 % water soluble fertilizers applied through drip in 20 equal weekly splits and results were compared with four control treatments. The study indicated the beneficial effects of drip irrigation in terms of 23.5 % increase in yield and 48.6 % water saving whereas drip with fertigation resulted into 40 to 61 % increase in pomegranate yield as compared to conventional method. The 100 % recommended dose of fertilizer through drip in 20 weekly splits showed 61 % increase in yield (14.6 t ha-1). However, it was on par with 80 % fertigation treatment (13.7 t ha-1). The pomegranate fruit yield obtained under 60 % fertigation (12.6 t ha-1) produced 38.9 % more yield as compared to farmer’s practice (9.05 t ha-1) indicating 40 % fertilizer saving due to fertigation. Maximum water use efficiency (79 kg ha-1mm-1) was obtained in 100 % fertigation. The fertigation resulted into B:C ratio in pomegranate in spite of very high market prices of water soluble fertilizers. The maximum net seasonal income (Rs. 475758 ha-1), total net income (Rs. 922546), net extra income over conventional method (Rs. 217984 ha-1) and maximum water productivity (Rs. 4607 mm-1 of water) were obtained in 100 % fertigation however all the economical parameters were on par with 80% fertigation applied in 20 equal weekly splits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation increased pomegranate yield by 23.5 %.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
drip irrigatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
23.5 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“beneficial effects of drip irrigation in terms of 23.5 % increase in yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–563 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation saved 48.6 % water.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
drip irrigatione0
Outcome
water savinge0
Direction
savinge0
Value
48.6 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drip irrigation in terms of 23.5 % increase in yield and 48.6 % water saving”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–587 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip fertigation increased pomegranate yield by 40 to 61 % versus conventional practice.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
drip with fertigatione0
Outcome
pomegranate yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
40 to 61 %e0
Comparator
conventional methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drip with fertigation resulted into 40 to 61 % increase in pomegranate yield as compared to conventional method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–707 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full-dose drip fertigation increased yield 61 % to 14.6 t ha-1.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
100 % recommended dose of fertilizer through drip in 20 weekly splitse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
61 %e0
Qualifier
14.6 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 100 % recommended dose of fertilizer through drip in 20 weekly splits showed 61 % increase in yield (14.6 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–826 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield under full-dose fertigation was on par with 80 % fertigation, which yielded 13.7 t ha-1.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
80 % fertigation treatmente0
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
on pare0
Value
13.7 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it was on par with 80 % fertigation treatment (13.7 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–896 · show in text ↑
e1

“61 % increase in yield (14.6 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–826 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 60 % fertigation, fruit yield was 12.6 t ha-1 and 38.9 % above farmer practice.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
60 % fertigatione0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
moree0
Value
38.9 %e0
Qualifier
12.6 t ha-1e0
Comparator
farmer’s practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pomegranate fruit yield obtained under 60 % fertigation (12.6 t ha-1) produced 38.9 % more yield as compared to farmer’s practice (9.05 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1045 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60 % fertigation treatment saved 40 % fertilizer.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
fertigatione0
Outcome
fertilizer savinge0
Direction
savinge0
Value
40 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“40 % fertilizer saving due to fertigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1098 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full fertigation gave maximum water use efficiency of 79 kg ha-1mm-1.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
100 % fertigatione0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
79 kg ha-1mm-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum water use efficiency (79 kg ha-1mm-1) was obtained in 100 % fertigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1179 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertigation yielded a B:C ratio despite expensive soluble fertilizers.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Qualifier
very high market prices of water soluble fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fertigation resulted into B:C ratio in pomegranate in spite of very high market prices of water soluble fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1300 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full fertigation gave maximum net seasonal income of Rs. 475758 ha-1.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
100 % fertigatione1
Outcome
net seasonal incomee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
Rs. 475758 ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum net seasonal income (Rs. 475758 ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1351 · show in text ↑
e1

“were obtained in 100 % fertigation however”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1500–1542 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full fertigation gave total net income of Rs. 922546.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Outcome
total net incomee0
Value
Rs. 922546e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total net income (Rs. 922546)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1353–1382 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full fertigation gave Rs. 217984 ha-1 extra income versus conventional practice.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Outcome
net extra incomee0
Value
Rs. 217984 ha-1e0
Comparator
conventional methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net extra income over conventional method (Rs. 217984 ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1443 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full fertigation gave maximum water productivity of Rs. 4607 mm-1 of water.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Outcome
water productivitye0
Direction
maximume0
Value
Rs. 4607 mm-1 of watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum water productivity (Rs. 4607 mm-1 of water)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1499 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Economic parameters under full fertigation were on par with 80% fertigation.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
80% fertigation applied in 20 equal weekly splitse0
Outcome
economical parameterse0
Direction
on pare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all the economical parameters were on par with 80% fertigation applied in 20 equal weekly splits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1543–1639 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 26 positive, 8 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

fertilization · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 38 positive, 2 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

fertilization · physiology: water · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.