Paper · 2012 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

Integrated nutrient management in pomegranate grown in laterite soil

Sukanya Ghosh; Biswajit Bera; Sujan Chandra Roy; et al.

10
claims
34
verbatim quotes
17
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

To produce good quality pomegranate in larger quantity, an experiment was conducted on 5-year-old plants of cv. Ruby in a private orchard at Jhargram, Paschim Midnapore where soil is laterite and climate is sub-tropical. There were nine manurial treatments which consisted of organic manures and inorganic fertilizers, applied individually and in combination following R.b.D. Three consecutive years of study indicated that FYM was better than vermicompost with regard to improvement in plant growth and fruit production. Plant growth in respect of basal girth and canopy was highest in plant where FYM (20 kg/plant) was applied singly or combined with inorganic fertilizers. Highest yield (8.1 kg/plant) was recorded in plant where FYM 20 kg along with N400P100K300g/year was applied that was associated with the foliar N/K ratio of 1.3. The treatment also resulted in maximum fruit weight (200 g) with the highest TSS (14.8°B), reducing sugar (12.0%) and vit. C (12.5 mg/100 ml) content. The fruits from organic fertilized plant showed maximum storage life with less PLW.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM was better than vermicompost for plant growth and fruit production of pomegranate.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
cv. Rubye0
Treatment
FYMe1
Outcome
plant growth and fruit productione1
Direction
bettere1
Comparator
vermicomposte1
Setting
private orchard at Jhargram, Paschim Midnaporee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Integrated nutrient management in pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“5-year-old plants of cv. Ruby in a private orchard at Jhargram, Paschim Midnapore”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–168 · show in text ↑
e1

“FYM was better than vermicompost with regard to improvement in plant growth and fruit production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–520 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM (20 kg/plant), applied singly or with inorganic fertilizers, gave the highest plant growth in basal girth and canopy of pomegranate.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
cv. Rubye0
Treatment
FYM (20 kg/plant)e2
Outcome
Plant growthe2
Direction
higheste2
Qualifier
basal girth and canopye2
Setting
private orchard at Jhargram, Paschim Midnaporee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Integrated nutrient management in pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“5-year-old plants of cv. Ruby in a private orchard at Jhargram, Paschim Midnapore”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–168 · show in text ↑
e2

“Plant growth in respect of basal girth and canopy was highest in plant where FYM (20 kg/plant) was applied singly or combined with inorganic fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–674 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM 20 kg with N400P100K300g/year gave the highest yield of pomegranate, 8.1 kg/plant.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
cv. Rubye0
Treatment
FYM 20 kg along with N400P100K300g/yeare3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
Higheste3
Value
8.1 kg/plante3
Setting
private orchard at Jhargram, Paschim Midnaporee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Integrated nutrient management in pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“5-year-old plants of cv. Ruby in a private orchard at Jhargram, Paschim Midnapore”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–168 · show in text ↑
e3

“Highest yield (8.1 kg/plant) was recorded in plant where FYM 20 kg along with N400P100K300g/year was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–784 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest yield of pomegranate was associated with a foliar N/K ratio of 1.3.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
cv. Rubye0
Outcome
foliar N/K ratioe4
Value
1.3e4
Qualifier
associated withe4
Setting
private orchard at Jhargram, Paschim Midnaporee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Integrated nutrient management in pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“5-year-old plants of cv. Ruby in a private orchard at Jhargram, Paschim Midnapore”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–168 · show in text ↑
e4

“that was associated with the foliar N/K ratio of 1.3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–837 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM 20 kg with N400P100K300g/year gave the maximum fruit weight of pomegranate, 200 g.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
cv. Rubye0
Treatment
FYM 20 kg along with N400P100K300g/yeare3
Outcome
fruit weighte5
Direction
maximume5
Value
200 ge5
Setting
private orchard at Jhargram, Paschim Midnaporee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Integrated nutrient management in pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“5-year-old plants of cv. Ruby in a private orchard at Jhargram, Paschim Midnapore”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–168 · show in text ↑
e3

“Highest yield (8.1 kg/plant) was recorded in plant where FYM 20 kg along with N400P100K300g/year was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–784 · show in text ↑
e5

“The treatment also resulted in maximum fruit weight (200 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–898 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM 20 kg with N400P100K300g/year gave the highest TSS of pomegranate fruit, 14.8°B.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
cv. Rubye0
Treatment
FYM 20 kg along with N400P100K300g/yeare3
Outcome
TSSe6
Direction
higheste6
Value
14.8°Be6
Setting
private orchard at Jhargram, Paschim Midnaporee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Integrated nutrient management in pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“5-year-old plants of cv. Ruby in a private orchard at Jhargram, Paschim Midnapore”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–168 · show in text ↑
e3

“Highest yield (8.1 kg/plant) was recorded in plant where FYM 20 kg along with N400P100K300g/year was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–784 · show in text ↑
e6

“with the highest TSS (14.8°B)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–928 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM 20 kg with N400P100K300g/year gave higher reducing sugar in pomegranate fruit, 12.0%.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
cv. Rubye0
Treatment
FYM 20 kg along with N400P100K300g/yeare3
Outcome
reducing sugare7
Direction
higherinferrede7
Value
12.0%e7
Setting
private orchard at Jhargram, Paschim Midnaporee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Integrated nutrient management in pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“5-year-old plants of cv. Ruby in a private orchard at Jhargram, Paschim Midnapore”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–168 · show in text ↑
e3

“Highest yield (8.1 kg/plant) was recorded in plant where FYM 20 kg along with N400P100K300g/year was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–784 · show in text ↑
e7

“reducing sugar (12.0%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–952 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM 20 kg with N400P100K300g/year gave higher vit. C content in pomegranate fruit, 12.5 mg/100 ml.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
cv. Rubye0
Treatment
FYM 20 kg along with N400P100K300g/yeare3
Outcome
vit. Ce7
Direction
higherinferrede7
Value
12.5 mg/100 mle7
Setting
private orchard at Jhargram, Paschim Midnaporee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Integrated nutrient management in pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“5-year-old plants of cv. Ruby in a private orchard at Jhargram, Paschim Midnapore”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–168 · show in text ↑
e3

“Highest yield (8.1 kg/plant) was recorded in plant where FYM 20 kg along with N400P100K300g/year was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–784 · show in text ↑
e7

“vit. C (12.5 mg/100 ml) content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–988 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pomegranate fruit from organically fertilized plants had the maximum storage life.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
cv. Rubye0
Treatment
organic fertilized plante1
Outcome
storage lifee1
Direction
maximume1
Setting
private orchard at Jhargram, Paschim Midnaporee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Integrated nutrient management in pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“5-year-old plants of cv. Ruby in a private orchard at Jhargram, Paschim Midnapore”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–168 · show in text ↑
e1

“The fruits from organic fertilized plant showed maximum storage life with less PLW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1072 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pomegranate fruit from organically fertilized plants had less physiological loss in weight (PLW).

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
cv. Rubye0
Treatment
organic fertilized plante1
Outcome
PLWe1
Direction
lesse1
Setting
private orchard at Jhargram, Paschim Midnaporee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Integrated nutrient management in pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“5-year-old plants of cv. Ruby in a private orchard at Jhargram, Paschim Midnapore”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–168 · show in text ↑
e1

“The fruits from organic fertilized plant showed maximum storage life with less PLW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1072 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 38 positive, 2 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

fertilization · growth · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

27 papers: 27 positive, 0 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.