Abstract
Triticale is a valuable grain forage and food crop. Application of fertilizers enables to both increase the grain yield and improve its quality indicators. Triticale responds positively to fertilization, foliar top dressing, and the action of growth-regulating drugs. The presented field experiments were carried out in 2014-2016 in the educational-scientific-practical center of the Mykolaiv national agrarian university on the southern chernozem, typical for the southern Steppe of Ukraine. Pre-sowing seed treatment, application of mineral fertilizers and foliar nitrogen fertilization had a positive effect on the length of the ear, the number of grains in it, the mass of grain from the ear of the main stem and the level of the formed yield of spring triticale grain. Among the studied fertilizer options, the introduction of N 30 P 30 before sowing and top dressing with ammonium nitrate at a dose of N 30 against the background of pre-sowing seed treatment with Escort-Bio was advantageous. In this variant, the yield was 3.61 t/ha, the length of the ear was 10.4 cm, the number of grains in the ear was 30.2 PCs, the weight of grain from the ear of the main stem was 1.43 g. Creating an optimal nutrition background for plants improved the quality indicators of the spring triticale grain. The most favorable conditions for the formation of grain nature were provided by applying N 60 P 30 before sowing and N 30 P 30 before sowing with top dressing in a dose of N 30 in the form of ammonium nitrate, urea or double top dressing with D2. The maximum protein content in the grain of the spring triticale was ensured by the introduction of N 30 P 30 into the sowing with feeding with carbamide at a dose of N 30 . Due to the higher yield, the highest conditional protein yield per hectare of spring triticale sowing was provided by the introduction of N 60 P 30 before sowing and N 30 P 30 before sowing with top dressing with ammonium nitrate in the phase of stooling at a dose of N 30 . Improving the background of plant nutrition in cultivation technology is a promising measure to increase the productivity of spring triticale.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Seed treatment, mineral fertilizer and foliar nitrogen improved ear traits and grain yield.
- Taxon
- spring triticale
×Triticosecalee0 - Treatment
- Pre-sowing seed treatment, application of mineral fertilizers and foliar nitrogen fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- length of the ear, the number of grains in it, the mass of grain from the ear of the main stem and the level of the formed yielde0
- Direction
- positive effecte0
- Setting
- southern Steppe of Ukrainet0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pre-sowing seed treatment, application of mineral fertilizers and foliar nitrogen fertilization had a positive effect on the length of the ear, the number of grains in it, the mass of grain from the ear of the main stem and the level of the formed yield of spring triticale grain”
t0“Southern Steppe of Ukraine”
Claim · model-written summary
The N 30 P 30 plus ammonium nitrate and Escort-Bio variant yielded 3.61 t/ha.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Value
- 3.61 t/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In this variant, the yield was 3.61 t/ha”
t0“Spring Triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
That variant produced 10.4 cm ears.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Outcome
- length of the eare0
- Value
- 10.4 cme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the length of the ear was 10.4 cm”
t0“Spring Triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
That variant produced 30.2 grains per ear.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Outcome
- number of grains in the eare0
- Value
- 30.2 PCse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the number of grains in the ear was 30.2 PCs”
t0“Spring Triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
That variant produced 1.43 g grain per main-stem ear.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Outcome
- weight of grain from the ear of the main steme0
- Value
- 1.43 ge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the weight of grain from the ear of the main stem was 1.43 g”
t0“Spring Triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Optimal nutrition improved spring triticale grain quality indicators.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalee0
- Treatment
- optimal nutrition backgrounde0
- Outcome
- quality indicatorse0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Creating an optimal nutrition background for plants improved the quality indicators of the spring triticale grain”
Claim · model-written summary
N 60 P 30 before sowing gave favorable grain-nature formation.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Treatment
- N 60 P 30 before sowinge0
- Outcome
- formation of grain naturee0
- Direction
- most favorablee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“most favorable conditions for the formation of grain nature were provided by applying N 60 P 30 before sowing”
t0“Spring Triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
N 30 P 30 plus top dressing also favored grain-nature formation.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Treatment
- N 30 P 30 before sowing with top dressing in a dose of N 30 in the form of ammonium nitrate, urea or double top dressing with D2e0
- Outcome
- formation of grain naturee1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“N 30 P 30 before sowing with top dressing in a dose of N 30 in the form of ammonium nitrate, urea or double top dressing with D2”
t0“Spring Triticale”
e1“most favorable conditions for the formation of grain nature were provided by applying N 60 P 30 before sowing”
Claim · model-written summary
N 30 P 30 plus carbamide top dressing maximized grain protein content.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalee0
- Treatment
- introduction of N 30 P 30 into the sowing with feeding with carbamide at a dose of N 30e0
- Outcome
- protein content in the graine0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maximum protein content in the grain of the spring triticale was ensured by the introduction of N 30 P 30 into the sowing with feeding with carbamide at a dose of N 30”
Claim · model-written summary
N 60 P 30 before sowing gave the highest conditional protein yield per hectare.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalee0
- Treatment
- N 60 P 30 before sowinge0
- Outcome
- conditional protein yield per hectaree0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“highest conditional protein yield per hectare of spring triticale sowing was provided by the introduction of N 60 P 30 before sowing”
Claim · model-written summary
N 30 P 30 plus ammonium nitrate top dressing gave the highest conditional protein yield per hectare.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalee0
- Treatment
- N 30 P 30 before sowing with top dressing with ammonium nitrate in the phase of stooling at a dose of N 30e0
- Outcome
- conditional protein yield per hectaree0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“highest conditional protein yield per hectare of spring triticale sowing was provided by the introduction of N 60 P 30 before sowing and N 30 P 30 before sowing with top dressing with ammonium nitrate in the phase of stooling at a dose of N 30”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend improving plant nutrition to increase spring triticale productivity.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalee0
- Outcome
- Improving the background of plant nutrition in cultivation technologye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Improving the background of plant nutrition in cultivation technology is a promising measure to increase the productivity of spring triticale”
The same questions in other papers
ammonium nitrate · quality: protein · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
fertilization · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Results differ
84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
94 papers more in this group
See all 98 papers →fertilization · quality: protein · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →application · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →nitrogen · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results
47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
50 papers more in this group
See all 54 papers →seed treatment · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.