Paper · 2024 · Pochvovedenie i agrokhimiya

The effect of different doses of ammonium nitrate on the yield and protein content in spring triticale grain

P. Е. Nazarova; Ya. P. Nazdrachev; E. V. Mamykin

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The article presents the results of studying the effect of various doses of ammonium nitrate on the yield and protein content in spring triticale grain. Numerous studies around the world have established that nitrogen is a key factor influencing the productivity of grain crops. The paper presents the results of a 5-year study (2018-2022) of cultivating spring triticale using fallow and stubble predecessors. Nitrogen fertilizer was applied when sowing in rows at a dose of 20 to 80 kg/ha in the active substance. The experiments were carried out in the Akmola region (LLP "SPCGF named after A. Barayev") on southern carbonate chernozem. Over the five years of research, only 2018 was characterized by optimal hydrothermal conditions during the triticale growing season, the remaining four years (2019-2022) were dry. The reserves of productive moisture in the meter layer of soil before sowing triticale in fallow were 119-138 mm, in stubble - 119-125 mm. The content of N-NO 3 in the soil layer 0-40 cm before sowing triticale varied according to the years of research, so for fallow it varied from 11 to 28 mg/kg, and for stubble from 10 to 17 mg/kg of soil. The amount of P 2 O 5 before sowing (in the soil layer of 0-20 cm), regardless of the predecessor, varied within 24-37 mg/kg of soil. It was not possible to establish a reliable effect of different doses of ammonium nitrate on grain yield and protein content in triticale grain using the two studied precursors. A strong correlation between the dose of nitrogen fertilizer and the yield of triticale based on the steam predecessor was established only in 2020 (r = 0.85) and in 2021 (r = 0.83). For stubble, a strong positive correlation between nitrogen doses and yield was noted in 2019 (r = 0.78), 2021 (r = 0.79) and 2022 (r = 0.87). A correlation between the protein content in triticale grain and nitrogen doses was established based on the fallow in 2 of 4 years (r = 0.86...0.96). For the stubble, a strong positive relationship was noted in all years of research (r = 0.83...0.99).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nitrate dose had no reliable effect on triticale grain yield.

Taxon
spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
different doses of ammonium nitratee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Qualifier
using the two studied precursorse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was not possible to establish a reliable effect of different doses of ammonium nitrate on grain yield and protein content in triticale grain using the two studied precursors.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1475 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nitrate dose had no reliable effect on triticale grain protein content.

Taxon
spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
different doses of ammonium nitratee0
Outcome
protein content in triticale graine0
Qualifier
using the two studied precursorse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was not possible to establish a reliable effect of different doses of ammonium nitrate on grain yield and protein content in triticale grain using the two studied precursors.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1475 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen dose correlated strongly with yield after the steam predecessor in 2020.

Taxon
spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
dose of nitrogen fertilizere0
Outcome
yield of triticalee0
Value
r = 0.85e0
Qualifier
2020e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A strong correlation between the dose of nitrogen fertilizer and the yield of triticale based on the steam predecessor was established only in 2020 (r = 0.85) and in 2021 (r = 0.83).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1658 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen dose correlated strongly with yield after the steam predecessor in 2021.

Taxon
spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
dose of nitrogen fertilizere0
Outcome
yield of triticalee0
Value
r = 0.83e0
Qualifier
2021e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A strong correlation between the dose of nitrogen fertilizer and the yield of triticale based on the steam predecessor was established only in 2020 (r = 0.85) and in 2021 (r = 0.83).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1658 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen dose positively correlated with yield after stubble in 2019.

Taxon
spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
nitrogen dosese0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
positivee0
Value
r = 0.78e0
Qualifier
2019e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For stubble, a strong positive correlation between nitrogen doses and yield was noted in 2019 (r = 0.78), 2021 (r = 0.79) and 2022 (r = 0.87).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1659–1801 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen dose positively correlated with yield after stubble in 2021.

Taxon
spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
nitrogen dosese0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
positivee0
Value
r = 0.79e0
Qualifier
2021e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For stubble, a strong positive correlation between nitrogen doses and yield was noted in 2019 (r = 0.78), 2021 (r = 0.79) and 2022 (r = 0.87).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1659–1801 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen dose positively correlated with yield after stubble in 2022.

Taxon
spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
nitrogen dosese0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
positivee0
Value
r = 0.87e0
Qualifier
2022e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For stubble, a strong positive correlation between nitrogen doses and yield was noted in 2019 (r = 0.78), 2021 (r = 0.79) and 2022 (r = 0.87).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1659–1801 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen dose correlated with grain protein after fallow in two of four years.

Taxon
spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
nitrogen dosese0
Outcome
protein content in triticale graine0
Value
r = 0.86...0.96e0
Qualifier
2 of 4 yearse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A correlation between the protein content in triticale grain and nitrogen doses was established based on the fallow in 2 of 4 years (r = 0.86...0.96).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1802–1952 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen dose and grain protein had a strong positive relationship after stubble in all years.

Taxon
spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
Outcome
relationshipe0
Direction
positivee0
Value
r = 0.83...0.99e0
Qualifier
all years of researche0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For the stubble, a strong positive relationship was noted in all years of research (r = 0.83...0.99).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1953–2054 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑

ammonium nitrate · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

ammonium nitrate · quality: protein · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.