Paper · 2020 · Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies

Bio-efficacy of bio-pesticides against tobacco caterpillar (Spodoptera litura. Fab) on cabbage

Nanjamma Gari Sumanjali; Akhilesh Tripathi; Anoorag R. Tayde

10
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present investigation was carried out during rabi season of 2019-2020 at Experimental farm in SHUATS, Prayagraj. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with seven treatments viz., Beauveria bassiana (1.5kg/ha), Bacillus thuringiensis (1.5kg/ha), NSKE (25kg/ha), Neem oil (15lit/ha), Spinosad (96ml/ha), Indoxacarb (73ml/ha) and Contol (Water). The observations on larval population Spodoptera litura 3, 5, and 7 days after treatment at each spraying (1st and 2nd spray) were recorded for computing the percent larval reduction. The yield data of cabbage heads influenced by each treatment were also recorded. Among all the treatments in both sprays Spinosad 45 EC was most efficacious in reducing the larval population (56.20% and 78.03%) of Spodoptera litura. The treatment with Bacillus thuringiensis (54.17% and 74.58%) also performed well against the pest. Similarly, Beauveria bassiana (51.83% and 72.20%), Indoxacarb (53.20% and 71.67%), NSKE (42.70% and 65.62%) and Neem oil (49.29% and 66.83%). Spinosad recorded the highest yield (285.40 q/ha), followed by NSKE which recorded (234.40 q/ha), Bacillus thuringiensis (222.70 q/ha) and Indoxacarb (222.20 q/ha) respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad 45 EC was the most efficacious treatment in reducing Spodoptera litura larval populations on cabbage

Treatment
Spinosad 45 ECe1
Interactor
Spodoptera lituraSpodoptera liturat0pest
Outcome
larval populatione1
Direction
reducinge1
Value
56.20% and 78.03%e1
Comparator
all the treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera litura
Spodoptera litura · InteractorDonald Hobern from Canberra, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tobacco caterpillar (Spodoptera litura. Fab) on cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among all the treatments in both sprays Spinosad 45 EC was most efficacious in reducing the larval population (56.20% and 78.03%) of Spodoptera litura”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–779 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus thuringiensis performed well against Spodoptera litura larvae on cabbage

Treatment
Bacillus thuringiensise2
Interactor
Spodoptera lituraSpodoptera liturat0pest
Second interactor
Bacillus thuringiensisBacillus thuringiensise2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
performed well against the peste2
Direction
performed welle2
Value
54.17% and 74.58%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera litura
Spodoptera litura · InteractorDonald Hobern from Canberra, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus thuringiensis
Bacillus thuringiensis · Second interactorSam LaRussa · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tobacco caterpillar (Spodoptera litura. Fab) on cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–94 · show in text ↑
e2

“The treatment with Bacillus thuringiensis (54.17% and 74.58%) also performed well against the pest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–879 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beauveria bassiana reduced Spodoptera litura larval population on cabbage

Treatment
Beauveria bassianae3
Interactor
Spodoptera lituraSpodoptera liturat0pest
Second interactor
Beauveria bassianaBeauveria bassianae3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
larval populatione1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1
Value
51.83% and 72.20%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera litura
Spodoptera litura · InteractorDonald Hobern from Canberra, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Beauveria bassiana
Beauveria bassiana · Second interactorBealeiderman · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tobacco caterpillar (Spodoptera litura. Fab) on cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among all the treatments in both sprays Spinosad 45 EC was most efficacious in reducing the larval population (56.20% and 78.03%) of Spodoptera litura”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–779 · show in text ↑
e3

“Similarly, Beauveria bassiana (51.83% and 72.20%), Indoxacarb (53.20% and 71.67%), NSKE (42.70% and 65.62%) and Neem oil (49.29% and 66.83%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–1021 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb reduced Spodoptera litura larval population on cabbage

Treatment
Indoxacarbe3
Interactor
Spodoptera lituraSpodoptera liturat0pest
Outcome
larval populatione1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1
Value
53.20% and 71.67%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera litura
Spodoptera litura · InteractorDonald Hobern from Canberra, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tobacco caterpillar (Spodoptera litura. Fab) on cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among all the treatments in both sprays Spinosad 45 EC was most efficacious in reducing the larval population (56.20% and 78.03%) of Spodoptera litura”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–779 · show in text ↑
e3

“Similarly, Beauveria bassiana (51.83% and 72.20%), Indoxacarb (53.20% and 71.67%), NSKE (42.70% and 65.62%) and Neem oil (49.29% and 66.83%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–1021 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NSKE reduced Spodoptera litura larval population on cabbage

Treatment
NSKEe3
Interactor
Spodoptera lituraSpodoptera liturat0pest
Outcome
larval populatione1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1
Value
42.70% and 65.62%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera litura
Spodoptera litura · InteractorDonald Hobern from Canberra, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tobacco caterpillar (Spodoptera litura. Fab) on cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among all the treatments in both sprays Spinosad 45 EC was most efficacious in reducing the larval population (56.20% and 78.03%) of Spodoptera litura”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–779 · show in text ↑
e3

“Similarly, Beauveria bassiana (51.83% and 72.20%), Indoxacarb (53.20% and 71.67%), NSKE (42.70% and 65.62%) and Neem oil (49.29% and 66.83%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–1021 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem oil reduced Spodoptera litura larval population on cabbage

Treatment
Neem oile3
Interactor
Spodoptera lituraSpodoptera liturat0pest
Outcome
larval populatione1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1
Value
49.29% and 66.83%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera litura
Spodoptera litura · InteractorDonald Hobern from Canberra, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tobacco caterpillar (Spodoptera litura. Fab) on cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among all the treatments in both sprays Spinosad 45 EC was most efficacious in reducing the larval population (56.20% and 78.03%) of Spodoptera litura”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–779 · show in text ↑
e3

“Similarly, Beauveria bassiana (51.83% and 72.20%), Indoxacarb (53.20% and 71.67%), NSKE (42.70% and 65.62%) and Neem oil (49.29% and 66.83%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–1021 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad gave the highest cabbage yield, 285.40 q/ha

Treatment
Spinosade4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
higheste4
Value
285.40 q/hae4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tobacco caterpillar (Spodoptera litura. Fab) on cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–94 · show in text ↑
e4

“Spinosad recorded the highest yield (285.40 q/ha), followed by NSKE which recorded (234.40 q/ha), Bacillus thuringiensis (222.70 q/ha) and Indoxacarb (222.20 q/ha) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NSKE gave 234.40 q/ha cabbage yield, the second-highest yield

Treatment
NSKEe4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
higherinferrede4
Value
234.40 q/hae4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tobacco caterpillar (Spodoptera litura. Fab) on cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–94 · show in text ↑
e4

“Spinosad recorded the highest yield (285.40 q/ha), followed by NSKE which recorded (234.40 q/ha), Bacillus thuringiensis (222.70 q/ha) and Indoxacarb (222.20 q/ha) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus thuringiensis gave 222.70 q/ha cabbage yield

Treatment
Bacillus thuringiensise4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
higherinferrede4
Value
222.70 q/hae4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tobacco caterpillar (Spodoptera litura. Fab) on cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–94 · show in text ↑
e4

“Spinosad recorded the highest yield (285.40 q/ha), followed by NSKE which recorded (234.40 q/ha), Bacillus thuringiensis (222.70 q/ha) and Indoxacarb (222.20 q/ha) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb gave 222.20 q/ha cabbage yield

Treatment
Indoxacarbe4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
higherinferrede4
Value
222.20 q/hae4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tobacco caterpillar (Spodoptera litura. Fab) on cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–94 · show in text ↑
e4

“Spinosad recorded the highest yield (285.40 q/ha), followed by NSKE which recorded (234.40 q/ha), Bacillus thuringiensis (222.70 q/ha) and Indoxacarb (222.20 q/ha) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1199 · show in text ↑

Bacillus thuringiensis · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

indoxacarb · Spodoptera litura · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

spinosad · Spodoptera litura · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

indoxacarb · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

spinosad · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

25 papers: 25 positive, 0 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

botanical · Spodoptera litura · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.