Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Effect of biostimulants and biofertilizers on growth and flowering of Chrysanthemum cv. Ratlam selection

NV Gawade; D. K. Varu; U. R. Devdhara

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present experiment entitled “Effect of biostimulants and biofertilizers on growth and flowering of Chrysanthemum cv. Ratlam Selection” was carried out at Jamuvadi Farm, Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh, during October 2017 to February 2019. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design with Factorial concept (FRBD) consisting two factors with three replications. The treatment comprised with five biostimulants and three treatments of biofertilizers. The results indicated that the foliar application of humic acid @ 0.2% at 60, 90 & 120 DAT with soil drenching of Azotobacter @ 3 l/ha + PSB @ 3 l/ha + KSB @ 3 l/ha after transplanting in addition to recommended dose of fertilizers (120:60:60 kg/ha NPK) produced better growth characters viz., the plant height, plant spread (E-W and N-S), number of shoots per plant, fresh weight of plant, dry weight of plant as well as flowering characters viz., initiation of flowering, days to 50% flowering, flowering duration (days), flower stalk length and flower stalk thickness.in Chrysanthemum cv. Ratlam Selection.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined humic acid, Azotobacter, PSB and KSB treatment produced better plant height, spread and shoot number.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemume1
Material
Ratlam Selectione1
Treatment
foliar application of humic acid @ 0.2% at 60, 90 & 120 DAT with soil drenching of Azotobacter @ 3 l/ha + PSB @ 3 l/ha + KSB @ 3 l/hae0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
plant height, plant spread (E-W and N-S), number of shoots per plante0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the foliar application of humic acid @ 0.2% at 60, 90 & 120 DAT with soil drenching of Azotobacter @ 3 l/ha + PSB @ 3 l/ha + KSB @ 3 l/ha after transplanting in addition to recommended dose of fertilizers (120:60:60 kg/ha NPK) produced better growth characters viz., the plant height, plant spread (E-W and N-S), number of shoots per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–894 · show in text ↑
e1

“in Chrysanthemum cv. Ratlam Selection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment produced better plant fresh and dry weight.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemume1
Material
Ratlam Selectione1
Treatment
foliar application of humic acid @ 0.2% at 60, 90 & 120 DAT with soil drenching of Azotobacter @ 3 l/ha + PSB @ 3 l/ha + KSB @ 3 l/hae0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
fresh weight of plant, dry weight of plante0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of humic acid @ 0.2% at 60, 90 & 120 DAT with soil drenching of Azotobacter @ 3 l/ha + PSB @ 3 l/ha + KSB @ 3 l/ha after transplanting in addition to recommended dose of fertilizers (120:60:60 kg/ha NPK) produced better growth characters viz., the plant height, plant spread (E-W and N-S), number of shoots per plant, fresh weight of plant, dry weight of plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–938 · show in text ↑
e1

“in Chrysanthemum cv. Ratlam Selection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment improved flowering initiation, days to 50% flowering and flowering duration.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemume1
Material
Ratlam Selectione1
Treatment
foliar application of humic acid @ 0.2% at 60, 90 & 120 DAT with soil drenching of Azotobacter @ 3 l/ha + PSB @ 3 l/ha + KSB @ 3 l/hae0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
initiation of flowering, days to 50% flowering, flowering duration (days)e0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the foliar application of humic acid @ 0.2% at 60, 90 & 120 DAT with soil drenching of Azotobacter @ 3 l/ha + PSB @ 3 l/ha + KSB @ 3 l/ha after transplanting in addition to recommended dose of fertilizers (120:60:60 kg/ha NPK) produced better growth characters viz., the plant height, plant spread (E-W and N-S), number of shoots per plant, fresh weight of plant, dry weight of plant as well as flowering characters viz., initiation of flowering, days to 50% flowering, flowering duration (days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–1050 · show in text ↑
e1

“in Chrysanthemum cv. Ratlam Selection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment improved flower stalk length and thickness.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemume1
Material
Ratlam Selectione1
Treatment
foliar application of humic acid @ 0.2% at 60, 90 & 120 DAT with soil drenching of Azotobacter @ 3 l/ha + PSB @ 3 l/ha + KSB @ 3 l/hae0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
flower stalk length and flower stalk thicknesse0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the foliar application of humic acid @ 0.2% at 60, 90 & 120 DAT with soil drenching of Azotobacter @ 3 l/ha + PSB @ 3 l/ha + KSB @ 3 l/ha after transplanting in addition to recommended dose of fertilizers (120:60:60 kg/ha NPK) produced better growth characters viz., the plant height, plant spread (E-W and N-S), number of shoots per plant, fresh weight of plant, dry weight of plant as well as flowering characters viz., initiation of flowering, days to 50% flowering, flowering duration (days), flower stalk length and flower stalk thickness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–1098 · show in text ↑
e1

“in Chrysanthemum cv. Ratlam Selection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1136 · show in text ↑

Azotobacter · phenology · ChrysanthemumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Azotobacter · growth · ChrysanthemumResults agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

application · phenology · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

application · growth · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

28 papers: 20 positive, 8 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

other · phenology · ChrysanthemumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

other · growth · ChrysanthemumResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.