Paper · 2005 · Journal of Ornamental Horticulture

Response studies in chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora Tzevlev) plugs as self rooted cuttings grown in gel-amended media under greenhouse nursery

M.C. Singh Anupama; Krishan P. Singh; D.P. Singh; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to study the rooting in chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflor Tzevlev) terminal stem cuttings in a media comprising of coco peat, vermiculite and perlite mixsed in 6:1:1 ratio and amended a super absorbent gel (0,0.5,1.0,1.5 or 2.0 % on weight by weight basis) to raise plugs. Terminal cuttings with three nodes, taken from chrysanthemum cultiver, Yellow Bouquet, planted in plastic pro-trays under an artificial supplemental light of 460-μmol second -1 m-2 for seven day. It was recorded that the media amended with 0.5 % hydrogel took lowest duration (18.6 day) to produce healthy cuttings followed by 1.0 % gel (20.40 day) as compared to the control (24.00 day) to produce the piantable height (i.e. 15.00 cm). Growth of self- rooted cuttings was recorded at maximum height (19.5 cm), number of leaves (14.20), stem diameter (0.22 cm), root area (38.16 cm2), fresh root weight (5.6 g/plant) and fresh shoot weight (11.46 g/cutting) in treatment amended with 0. 5 % hydrogel. However, the number of leaves and stem diameter could not differed significantly even after three week of their growth in nursery. The fresh root and shoot weight also differed significantly among themselves and could produce the highest fresh weight (5.68 g/cutting) in media amended with 0.5 % hydrogel followed by 1.0 % (4.12 g) and 1.5 % (3.66 g) as against the lowest (2.92 g/cutting) fresh root weight under control. However, the highest average fresh shoot weight (11.46 g/cutting) was noted in the cuttings raised in media amended with 0.5 % hydrogel with in three week duration with 60 % reduction in the frequency of fertigation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

0.5 % hydrogel shortened time to plantable chrysanthemum cuttings to 18.6 day.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
0.5 % hydrogele0
Outcome
duratione0
Direction
loweste0
Value
18.6 daye0
Qualifier
24.00 daye0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was recorded that the media amended with 0.5 % hydrogel took lowest duration (18.6 day) to produce healthy cuttings followed by 1.0 % gel (20.40 day) as compared to the control (24.00 day) to produce the piantable height (i.e. 15.00 cm).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–742 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora Tzevlev)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1.0 % gel shortened time to plantable chrysanthemum cuttings to 20.40 day.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
1.0 % gele0
Outcome
duratione0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
20.40 daye0
Qualifier
24.00 daye0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was recorded that the media amended with 0.5 % hydrogel took lowest duration (18.6 day) to produce healthy cuttings followed by 1.0 % gel (20.40 day) as compared to the control (24.00 day) to produce the piantable height (i.e. 15.00 cm).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–742 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora Tzevlev)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

0.5% hydrogel gave maximum height of 19.5 cm.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
0. 5 % hydrogele0
Outcome
heighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
19.5 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth of self- rooted cuttings was recorded at maximum height (19.5 cm), number of leaves (14.20), stem diameter (0.22 cm), root area (38.16 cm2), fresh root weight (5.6 g/plant) and fresh shoot weight (11.46 g/cutting) in treatment amended with 0. 5 % hydrogel.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–1006 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora Tzevlev)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

0.5% hydrogel gave maximum number of leaves of 14.20.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
0. 5 % hydrogele0
Outcome
number of leavese0
Direction
maximume0
Value
14.20e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth of self- rooted cuttings was recorded at maximum height (19.5 cm), number of leaves (14.20), stem diameter (0.22 cm), root area (38.16 cm2), fresh root weight (5.6 g/plant) and fresh shoot weight (11.46 g/cutting) in treatment amended with 0. 5 % hydrogel.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–1006 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora Tzevlev)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

0.5% hydrogel gave maximum stem diameter of 0.22 cm.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
0. 5 % hydrogele0
Outcome
stem diametere0
Direction
maximume0
Value
0.22 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth of self- rooted cuttings was recorded at maximum height (19.5 cm), number of leaves (14.20), stem diameter (0.22 cm), root area (38.16 cm2), fresh root weight (5.6 g/plant) and fresh shoot weight (11.46 g/cutting) in treatment amended with 0. 5 % hydrogel.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–1006 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora Tzevlev)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

0.5% hydrogel gave maximum root area of 38.16 cm2.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
0. 5 % hydrogele0
Outcome
root areae0
Direction
maximume0
Value
38.16 cm2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth of self- rooted cuttings was recorded at maximum height (19.5 cm), number of leaves (14.20), stem diameter (0.22 cm), root area (38.16 cm2), fresh root weight (5.6 g/plant) and fresh shoot weight (11.46 g/cutting) in treatment amended with 0. 5 % hydrogel.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–1006 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora Tzevlev)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

0.5% hydrogel gave maximum fresh root weight of 5.6 g/plant.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
0. 5 % hydrogele0
Outcome
fresh root weighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
5.6 g/plante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth of self- rooted cuttings was recorded at maximum height (19.5 cm), number of leaves (14.20), stem diameter (0.22 cm), root area (38.16 cm2), fresh root weight (5.6 g/plant) and fresh shoot weight (11.46 g/cutting) in treatment amended with 0. 5 % hydrogel.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–1006 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora Tzevlev)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

0.5% hydrogel gave maximum fresh shoot weight of 11.46 g/cutting.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
0. 5 % hydrogele0
Outcome
fresh shoot weighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
11.46 g/cuttinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth of self- rooted cuttings was recorded at maximum height (19.5 cm), number of leaves (14.20), stem diameter (0.22 cm), root area (38.16 cm2), fresh root weight (5.6 g/plant) and fresh shoot weight (11.46 g/cutting) in treatment amended with 0. 5 % hydrogel.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–1006 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora Tzevlev)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf number and stem diameter did not differ significantly after three weeks.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Outcome
number of leaves and stem diametere0
Direction
could not differede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the number of leaves and stem diameter could not differed significantly even after three week of their growth in nursery.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1137 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora Tzevlev)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

0.5 % hydrogel produced fresh root weight 5.68 g/cutting.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
0.5 % hydrogele0
Outcome
fresh root weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.68 g/cuttinge0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fresh root and shoot weight also differed significantly among themselves and could produce the highest fresh weight (5.68 g/cutting) in media amended with 0.5 % hydrogel followed by 1.0 % (4.12 g) and 1.5 % (3.66 g) as against the lowest (2.92 g/cutting) fresh root weight under control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1429 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora Tzevlev)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

1.0 % produced fresh root weight 4.12 g.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
1.0 %e0
Outcome
fresh root weighte0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
4.12 ge0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fresh root and shoot weight also differed significantly among themselves and could produce the highest fresh weight (5.68 g/cutting) in media amended with 0.5 % hydrogel followed by 1.0 % (4.12 g) and 1.5 % (3.66 g) as against the lowest (2.92 g/cutting) fresh root weight under control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1429 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora Tzevlev)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

1.5 % produced fresh root weight 3.66 g.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
1.5 %e0
Outcome
fresh root weighte0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
3.66 ge0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fresh root and shoot weight also differed significantly among themselves and could produce the highest fresh weight (5.68 g/cutting) in media amended with 0.5 % hydrogel followed by 1.0 % (4.12 g) and 1.5 % (3.66 g) as against the lowest (2.92 g/cutting) fresh root weight under control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1429 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora Tzevlev)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

0.5% hydrogel gave the highest shoot fresh weight with reduced fertigation frequency.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
0.5 % hydrogele0
Outcome
average fresh shoot weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
11.46 g/cuttinge0
Qualifier
60 % reduction in the frequency of fertigatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the highest average fresh shoot weight (11.46 g/cutting) was noted in the cuttings raised in media amended with 0.5 % hydrogel with in three week duration with 60 % reduction in the frequency of fertigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1646 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora Tzevlev)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–68 · show in text ↑

other · growth · ChrysanthemumResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.