Paper · 1977 · Annals of Applied Biology

A comparison of the effects of a new quaternary ammonium growth retardant with those of other growth retarding chemicals on the pot chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium)

ROGER MENHENETT

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY A new quaternary ammonium growth retardant, i‐allyl‐i‐(3,7‐dimethyl‐octyl)‐piperidinium bromide (ADOPB), was compared with daminozide, ancymidol and chlorphonium chloride for its effectiveness in reducing lateral stem length in the pot chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium). Single foliar sprays of ADOPB applied at 100 to 250 ppm active ingredient (a.i.) gave excellent height control without phytotoxicity in cv. Bright Golden Anne throughout the year. Similar results were obtained in two trials with cvs Purple Anne and Regal Anne. As much as 10 to 50 times this concentration of daminozide was required to achieve a similar degree of height control. However, under summer conditions even high concentrations of daminozide did not adequately reduce stem length. Foliar sprays of ancymidol (50–100 ppm a.i.) also gave good control of stem length but this chemical was more effective when applied as a compost drench. Compost drenches of ADOPB reduced stem extension but a greater quantity of a.i. was required compared to a foliar spray. Foliar sprays of dikegulac‐sodium (100 to 5000 ppm a.i.) were very phytotoxic. Reductions in thelength of lateral stems were associated with marked decreases in their fresh and dry weights. Growth retardants delay the flowering of pot chrysanthemums by inducing a slower rate of flower bud development. Foliar sprays of ADOPB generally delayed flowering by 2–3 days more than did sprays of daminozide, but this was comparable with that associated with the use of compost drenches of chlorphonium chloride. High concentrations of all the retardants reduced the diameter of open flowers. Only daminozide caused a loss of flower colour in cv. Regal Anne. The results are discussed in relation to the mode of action of growth retardants, with particular reference to the effects of gibberellins on stem extension and flower development in the chrysanthemum.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ADOPB foliar sprays controlled height without phytotoxicity in Bright Golden Anne.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
cv. Bright Golden Annee0
Treatment
ADOPB applied at 100 to 250 ppm active ingredient (a.i.)e0
Outcome
height control without phytotoxicitye0
Direction
excellente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Single foliar sprays of ADOPB applied at 100 to 250 ppm active ingredient (a.i.) gave excellent height control without phytotoxicity in cv. Bright Golden Anne throughout the year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–465 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–145 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Purple Anne and Regal Anne showed similar responses to ADOPB.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
cvs Purple Anne and Regal Annee0
Outcome
Similar resultse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar results were obtained in two trials with cvs Purple Anne and Regal Anne.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–546 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Daminozide needed 10 to 50 times the ADOPB concentration for comparable height control.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
daminozidee0
Outcome
height controle0
Direction
similare0
Value
10 to 50 timese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As much as 10 to 50 times this concentration of daminozide was required to achieve a similar degree of height control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–665 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Even high daminozide concentrations inadequately reduced summer stem length.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
high concentrations of daminozidee0
Outcome
stem lengthe0
Direction
did not adequately reducee0
Qualifier
summer conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under summer conditions even high concentrations of daminozide did not adequately reduce stem length.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–776 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ancymidol sprays controlled stem length but compost drenches worked better.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
ancymidol (50–100 ppm a.i.)e0
Outcome
stem lengthe0
Direction
good controle0
Comparator
compost drenche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar sprays of ancymidol (50–100 ppm a.i.) also gave good control of stem length but this chemical was more effective when applied as a compost drench.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–930 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ADOPB compost drenches reduced stem extension but required more active ingredient than sprays.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
Compost drenches of ADOPBe0
Outcome
stem extensione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
foliar spraye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compost drenches of ADOPB reduced stem extension but a greater quantity of a.i. was required compared to a foliar spray.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1051 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dikegulac-sodium foliar sprays were phytotoxic.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
dikegulac‐sodium (100 to 5000 ppm a.i.)e0
Outcome
phytotoxice0
Direction
very phytotoxice0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar sprays of dikegulac‐sodium (100 to 5000 ppm a.i.) were very phytotoxic.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1130 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–145 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shorter lateral stems were associated with lower fresh and dry weights.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Organ / stage
lateral stemse0
Outcome
fresh and dry weightse0
Direction
decreasese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reductions in thelength of lateral stems were associated with marked decreases in their fresh and dry weights.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1241 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–145 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth retardants delayed flowering through slower flower bud development.

Taxon
pot chrysanthemumse0
Treatment
Growth retardantse0
Outcome
floweringe0
Qualifier
slower rate of flower bud developmente0

Verbatim

e0

“Growth retardants delay the flowering of pot chrysanthemums by inducing a slower rate of flower bud development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1354 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ADOPB delayed flowering 2–3 days more than daminozide.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
Foliar sprays of ADOPBe0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
delayede0
Value
2–3 dayse0
Comparator
sprays of daminozidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar sprays of ADOPB generally delayed flowering by 2–3 days more than did sprays of daminozide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1355–1452 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High concentrations of all retardants reduced open flower diameter.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
High concentrations of all the retardantse0
Outcome
diameter of open flowerse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High concentrations of all the retardants reduced the diameter of open flowers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1558–1637 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only daminozide caused flower colour loss in Regal Anne.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
cv. Regal Annee0
Treatment
daminozidee0
Outcome
flower coloure0
Direction
losse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only daminozide caused a loss of flower colour in cv. Regal Anne.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1638–1703 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–145 · show in text ↑

Daminozide · quality: postharvest · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

ancymidol · growth · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Daminozide · growth · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

application · phenology · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.