Paper · 2025 · PLANT ARCHIVES

EFFECT OF HUMIC ACID CONCENTRATIONS ON VEGETATIVE, FLORAL ATTRIBUTES AND ECONOMICS OF CHRYSANTHEMUM (DENDRANTHEMA GRANDIFLORA TZVELEV) VAR. GARDEN BEAUTY UNDER HILLY CONDITION OF UTTARAKHAND INDIA

19
claims
38
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In a naturally ventilated polyhouse, a study was performed to analyze the effect of foliar humic acid application on growth, flowering attributes and economics of the chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora Tzvelev) var.Garden Beauty in the temperate region of Uttarakhand.The experiment was laid out from June 2022 -February 2023 in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with four replications, incorporating six treatments of humic acid concentrations, viz: T 1 : Control, T 2 : 0.2%, T 3 : 0.4%, T 4 : 0.6%, T 5 : 0.8% and T 6 : 1.0%.Rooted cuttings were transplanted in raised beds at a spacing of 30 cm 30 cm.According to the results, significant effects were shown in all the parameters during the experiment.Plants sprayed with 0.6% humic acid resulted in tallest plants (102.75 cm), maximum number of primary branches per plants (8.10), number of leaves per plant (180.32),plant spread (44.30cm) and leaf area (22.67 cm 2 ).Similarly in case of floral attributes the same treatment i.e. 0.6% humic acid showed earliness in 1 st bud appearance (64.85 days), first flower opening (94.50 days), days taken for 50% flowering (104.50 days), maximum flowers per plant (89.00), number of flowers per plot (988.42),maximum cut sprays per plant (21.25), maximum flower diameter (11.95 cm), spray length (59.29 cm), vase life (14.50days), maximum gross return (53,111.00 /100m 2 ), Net return (27,643.46 / 100m 2 ) and cost benefit ratio (1:1.09).However, plants treated with 0.4% humic acid showed a prolonged duration of flowering (24.75 days).The experiment concludes that foliar application of humic acid at 0.6% was found most effective and economical viable for enhancing flower production of chrysanthemum in temperate region of Uttarakhand.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

0.6% humic acid produced tallest plants of 102.75 cm.

Taxon
CHRYSANTHEMUMChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
0.6% humic acide0
Outcome
tallest plantse0
Direction
talleste0
Value
102.75 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants sprayed with 0.6% humic acid resulted in tallest plants (102.75 cm), maximum number of primary branches per plants (8.10), number of leaves per plant (180.32),plant spread (44.30cm) and leaf area (22.67 cm 2 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–936 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHRYSANTHEMUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

0.6% humic acid produced number of primary branches per plants of 8.10.

Taxon
CHRYSANTHEMUMChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
0.6% humic acide0
Outcome
number of primary branches per plantse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
8.10e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants sprayed with 0.6% humic acid resulted in tallest plants (102.75 cm), maximum number of primary branches per plants (8.10), number of leaves per plant (180.32),plant spread (44.30cm) and leaf area (22.67 cm 2 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–936 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHRYSANTHEMUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

0.6% humic acid produced number of leaves per plant of 180.32.

Taxon
CHRYSANTHEMUMChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
0.6% humic acide0
Outcome
number of leaves per plante0
Direction
maximume0
Value
180.32e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants sprayed with 0.6% humic acid resulted in tallest plants (102.75 cm), maximum number of primary branches per plants (8.10), number of leaves per plant (180.32),plant spread (44.30cm) and leaf area (22.67 cm 2 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–936 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHRYSANTHEMUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

0.6% humic acid produced plant spread of 44.30cm.

Taxon
CHRYSANTHEMUMChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
0.6% humic acide0
Outcome
plant spreade0
Direction
maximume0
Value
44.30cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants sprayed with 0.6% humic acid resulted in tallest plants (102.75 cm), maximum number of primary branches per plants (8.10), number of leaves per plant (180.32),plant spread (44.30cm) and leaf area (22.67 cm 2 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–936 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHRYSANTHEMUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

0.6% humic acid produced leaf area of 22.67 cm 2.

Taxon
CHRYSANTHEMUMChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
0.6% humic acide0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
maximume0
Value
22.67 cm 2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants sprayed with 0.6% humic acid resulted in tallest plants (102.75 cm), maximum number of primary branches per plants (8.10), number of leaves per plant (180.32),plant spread (44.30cm) and leaf area (22.67 cm 2 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–936 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHRYSANTHEMUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

0.6% humic acid yielded 1 st bud appearance of 64.85 days.

Taxon
CHRYSANTHEMUMChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
0.6% humic acide0
Outcome
1 st bud appearancee0
Direction
earlinesse0
Value
64.85 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly in case of floral attributes the same treatment i.e. 0.6% humic acid showed earliness in 1 st bud appearance (64.85 days), first flower opening (94.50 days), days taken for 50% flowering (104.50 days), maximum flowers per plant (89.00), number of flowers per plot (988.42),maximum cut sprays per plant (21.25), maximum flower diameter (11.95 cm), spray length (59.29 cm), vase life (14.50days), maximum gross return (53,111.00 /100m 2 ), Net return (27,643.46 / 100m 2 ) and cost benefit ratio (1:1.09).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1449 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHRYSANTHEMUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

0.6% humic acid yielded first flower opening of 94.50 days.

Taxon
CHRYSANTHEMUMChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
0.6% humic acide0
Outcome
first flower openinge0
Direction
earlinesse0
Value
94.50 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly in case of floral attributes the same treatment i.e. 0.6% humic acid showed earliness in 1 st bud appearance (64.85 days), first flower opening (94.50 days), days taken for 50% flowering (104.50 days), maximum flowers per plant (89.00), number of flowers per plot (988.42),maximum cut sprays per plant (21.25), maximum flower diameter (11.95 cm), spray length (59.29 cm), vase life (14.50days), maximum gross return (53,111.00 /100m 2 ), Net return (27,643.46 / 100m 2 ) and cost benefit ratio (1:1.09).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1449 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHRYSANTHEMUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

0.6% humic acid yielded days taken for 50% flowering of 104.50 days.

Taxon
CHRYSANTHEMUMChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
0.6% humic acide0
Outcome
days taken for 50% floweringe0
Direction
earlinesse0
Value
104.50 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly in case of floral attributes the same treatment i.e. 0.6% humic acid showed earliness in 1 st bud appearance (64.85 days), first flower opening (94.50 days), days taken for 50% flowering (104.50 days), maximum flowers per plant (89.00), number of flowers per plot (988.42),maximum cut sprays per plant (21.25), maximum flower diameter (11.95 cm), spray length (59.29 cm), vase life (14.50days), maximum gross return (53,111.00 /100m 2 ), Net return (27,643.46 / 100m 2 ) and cost benefit ratio (1:1.09).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1449 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHRYSANTHEMUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

0.6% humic acid yielded flowers per plant of 89.00.

Taxon
CHRYSANTHEMUMChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
0.6% humic acide0
Outcome
flowers per plante0
Direction
maximume0
Value
89.00e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly in case of floral attributes the same treatment i.e. 0.6% humic acid showed earliness in 1 st bud appearance (64.85 days), first flower opening (94.50 days), days taken for 50% flowering (104.50 days), maximum flowers per plant (89.00), number of flowers per plot (988.42),maximum cut sprays per plant (21.25), maximum flower diameter (11.95 cm), spray length (59.29 cm), vase life (14.50days), maximum gross return (53,111.00 /100m 2 ), Net return (27,643.46 / 100m 2 ) and cost benefit ratio (1:1.09).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1449 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHRYSANTHEMUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

0.6% humic acid yielded number of flowers per plot of 988.42.

Taxon
CHRYSANTHEMUMChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
0.6% humic acide0
Outcome
number of flowers per plote0
Direction
maximume0
Value
988.42e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly in case of floral attributes the same treatment i.e. 0.6% humic acid showed earliness in 1 st bud appearance (64.85 days), first flower opening (94.50 days), days taken for 50% flowering (104.50 days), maximum flowers per plant (89.00), number of flowers per plot (988.42),maximum cut sprays per plant (21.25), maximum flower diameter (11.95 cm), spray length (59.29 cm), vase life (14.50days), maximum gross return (53,111.00 /100m 2 ), Net return (27,643.46 / 100m 2 ) and cost benefit ratio (1:1.09).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1449 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHRYSANTHEMUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

0.6% humic acid yielded cut sprays per plant of 21.25.

Taxon
CHRYSANTHEMUMChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
0.6% humic acide0
Outcome
cut sprays per plante0
Direction
maximume0
Value
21.25e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly in case of floral attributes the same treatment i.e. 0.6% humic acid showed earliness in 1 st bud appearance (64.85 days), first flower opening (94.50 days), days taken for 50% flowering (104.50 days), maximum flowers per plant (89.00), number of flowers per plot (988.42),maximum cut sprays per plant (21.25), maximum flower diameter (11.95 cm), spray length (59.29 cm), vase life (14.50days), maximum gross return (53,111.00 /100m 2 ), Net return (27,643.46 / 100m 2 ) and cost benefit ratio (1:1.09).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1449 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHRYSANTHEMUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

0.6% humic acid yielded flower diameter of 11.95 cm.

Taxon
CHRYSANTHEMUMChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
0.6% humic acide0
Outcome
flower diametere0
Direction
maximume0
Value
11.95 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly in case of floral attributes the same treatment i.e. 0.6% humic acid showed earliness in 1 st bud appearance (64.85 days), first flower opening (94.50 days), days taken for 50% flowering (104.50 days), maximum flowers per plant (89.00), number of flowers per plot (988.42),maximum cut sprays per plant (21.25), maximum flower diameter (11.95 cm), spray length (59.29 cm), vase life (14.50days), maximum gross return (53,111.00 /100m 2 ), Net return (27,643.46 / 100m 2 ) and cost benefit ratio (1:1.09).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1449 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHRYSANTHEMUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

0.6% humic acid yielded spray length of 59.29 cm.

Taxon
CHRYSANTHEMUMChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
0.6% humic acide0
Outcome
spray lengthe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
59.29 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly in case of floral attributes the same treatment i.e. 0.6% humic acid showed earliness in 1 st bud appearance (64.85 days), first flower opening (94.50 days), days taken for 50% flowering (104.50 days), maximum flowers per plant (89.00), number of flowers per plot (988.42),maximum cut sprays per plant (21.25), maximum flower diameter (11.95 cm), spray length (59.29 cm), vase life (14.50days), maximum gross return (53,111.00 /100m 2 ), Net return (27,643.46 / 100m 2 ) and cost benefit ratio (1:1.09).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1449 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHRYSANTHEMUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

0.6% humic acid yielded vase life of 14.50days.

Taxon
CHRYSANTHEMUMChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
0.6% humic acide0
Outcome
vase lifee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
14.50dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly in case of floral attributes the same treatment i.e. 0.6% humic acid showed earliness in 1 st bud appearance (64.85 days), first flower opening (94.50 days), days taken for 50% flowering (104.50 days), maximum flowers per plant (89.00), number of flowers per plot (988.42),maximum cut sprays per plant (21.25), maximum flower diameter (11.95 cm), spray length (59.29 cm), vase life (14.50days), maximum gross return (53,111.00 /100m 2 ), Net return (27,643.46 / 100m 2 ) and cost benefit ratio (1:1.09).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1449 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHRYSANTHEMUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

0.6% humic acid yielded gross return of 53,111.00 /100m 2.

Taxon
CHRYSANTHEMUMChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
0.6% humic acide0
Outcome
gross returne0
Direction
maximume0
Value
53,111.00 /100m 2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly in case of floral attributes the same treatment i.e. 0.6% humic acid showed earliness in 1 st bud appearance (64.85 days), first flower opening (94.50 days), days taken for 50% flowering (104.50 days), maximum flowers per plant (89.00), number of flowers per plot (988.42),maximum cut sprays per plant (21.25), maximum flower diameter (11.95 cm), spray length (59.29 cm), vase life (14.50days), maximum gross return (53,111.00 /100m 2 ), Net return (27,643.46 / 100m 2 ) and cost benefit ratio (1:1.09).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1449 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHRYSANTHEMUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

0.6% humic acid yielded Net return of 27,643.46 / 100m 2.

Taxon
CHRYSANTHEMUMChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
0.6% humic acide0
Outcome
Net returne0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
27,643.46 / 100m 2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly in case of floral attributes the same treatment i.e. 0.6% humic acid showed earliness in 1 st bud appearance (64.85 days), first flower opening (94.50 days), days taken for 50% flowering (104.50 days), maximum flowers per plant (89.00), number of flowers per plot (988.42),maximum cut sprays per plant (21.25), maximum flower diameter (11.95 cm), spray length (59.29 cm), vase life (14.50days), maximum gross return (53,111.00 /100m 2 ), Net return (27,643.46 / 100m 2 ) and cost benefit ratio (1:1.09).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1449 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHRYSANTHEMUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

0.6% humic acid yielded cost benefit ratio of 1:1.09.

Taxon
CHRYSANTHEMUMChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
0.6% humic acide0
Outcome
cost benefit ratioe0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
1:1.09e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly in case of floral attributes the same treatment i.e. 0.6% humic acid showed earliness in 1 st bud appearance (64.85 days), first flower opening (94.50 days), days taken for 50% flowering (104.50 days), maximum flowers per plant (89.00), number of flowers per plot (988.42),maximum cut sprays per plant (21.25), maximum flower diameter (11.95 cm), spray length (59.29 cm), vase life (14.50days), maximum gross return (53,111.00 /100m 2 ), Net return (27,643.46 / 100m 2 ) and cost benefit ratio (1:1.09).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1449 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHRYSANTHEMUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 0.4% humic acid spray prolonged flowering to 24.75 days.

Taxon
CHRYSANTHEMUMChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
0.4% humic acide0
Outcome
duration of floweringe0
Direction
prolongede0
Value
24.75 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants treated with 0.4% humic acid showed a prolonged duration of flowering (24.75 days).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1458–1548 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHRYSANTHEMUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–99 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 0.6% foliar humic acid for chrysanthemum flower production.

Taxon
CHRYSANTHEMUMChrysanthemumt0
Outcome
foliar application of humic acid at 0.6%e0
Setting
temperate region of Uttarakhande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of humic acid at 0.6% was found most effective and economical viable for enhancing flower production of chrysanthemum in temperate region of Uttarakhand.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1578–1750 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHRYSANTHEMUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–99 · show in text ↑

other · phenology · ChrysanthemumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

other · growth · ChrysanthemumResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.