Abstract
The bio-efficacy of different insecticides viz., bifenthrin 10 EC at 80 g a. i. ha-1, fipronil 5 SC at 500 g a.i. ha-1, flubendiamide 480 SC at 60 g a. i. ha-1, quinalphos 25 EC at 350 g a.i ha-1, profenophos 50 EC at 400 g a. i. ha-1 and β-cyfluthrin 25 SC at 18.75 g a.i. ha-1 against leafhopper (Amrasca biguttula biguttula Ishida) of okra was studied in the field conditions at Student’s Farm of Agricultural College, Hyderabad during 2012. All the insecticidal treatments were superior over control after second spray where, profenophos (400 g a. i. ha-1) recorded highest population reduction of 68.72 per cent followed by β-cyfluthrin (50.72 %) and bifenthrin (44.19 %). Further, dissipation pattern of profenophos at 400 g a. i. ha-1 was studied by collecting 500 g of okra fruits from the field on zero (1 hr), one, three, five, seven and ten and fifteen days after second spray and analysed at laboratory of AINP on pesticide residues, Hyderabad. An initial deposit of profenophos was recorded to be 1.52 mg kg-1 dissipated to below detectable level on 10th day. The half-life was 2.16 days with waiting period for safe harvest of okra fruit was 5.10 days.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
All insecticide treatments were superior to the control after the second spray against okra leafhopper.
- Taxon
- okra
.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- insecticidal treatmentse0
- Interactor
- leafhoppere2pest
- Outcome
- superior over controle0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“All the insecticidal treatments were superior over control after second spray”
t0“okra”
e1“highest population reduction of 68.72 per cent followed by β-cyfluthrin (50.72 %) and bifenthrin (44.19 %)”
e2“leafhopper (Amrasca biguttula biguttula Ishida) of okra”
e3“profenophos at 400 g a. i. ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
Profenophos gave the highest leafhopper population reduction, 68.72 per cent.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- profenophos (400 g a. i. ha-1)e0
- Interactor
- leafhoppere2pest
- Outcome
- population reductione0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 68.72 per cente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“profenophos (400 g a. i. ha-1) recorded highest population reduction of 68.72 per cent”
t0“okra”
e1“highest population reduction of 68.72 per cent followed by β-cyfluthrin (50.72 %) and bifenthrin (44.19 %)”
e2“leafhopper (Amrasca biguttula biguttula Ishida) of okra”
e3“profenophos at 400 g a. i. ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
β-cyfluthrin reduced leafhopper population by 50.72 %.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- β-cyfluthrine0
- Interactor
- leafhoppere2pest
- Outcome
- population reductione1
- Value
- 50.72 %e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“β-cyfluthrin (50.72 %)”
t0“okra”
e1“highest population reduction of 68.72 per cent followed by β-cyfluthrin (50.72 %) and bifenthrin (44.19 %)”
e2“leafhopper (Amrasca biguttula biguttula Ishida) of okra”
e3“profenophos at 400 g a. i. ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
Bifenthrin reduced leafhopper population by 44.19 %.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- bifenthrine0
- Interactor
- leafhoppere2pest
- Outcome
- population reductione1
- Value
- 44.19 %e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“bifenthrin (44.19 %)”
t0“okra”
e1“highest population reduction of 68.72 per cent followed by β-cyfluthrin (50.72 %) and bifenthrin (44.19 %)”
e2“leafhopper (Amrasca biguttula biguttula Ishida) of okra”
e3“profenophos at 400 g a. i. ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
The initial profenophos deposit on okra fruits was 1.52 mg kg-1.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Outcome
- initial deposit of profenophose0
- Value
- 1.52 mg kg-1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“An initial deposit of profenophos was recorded to be 1.52 mg kg-1”
t0“okra”
e1“highest population reduction of 68.72 per cent followed by β-cyfluthrin (50.72 %) and bifenthrin (44.19 %)”
e2“leafhopper (Amrasca biguttula biguttula Ishida) of okra”
e3“profenophos at 400 g a. i. ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
Profenophos residue in okra fruits dissipated below detectable level on day 10.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- profenophos at 400 g a. i. ha-1e3
- Outcome
- profenophose3
- Direction
- dissipatede0
- Qualifier
- 10th daye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“dissipated to below detectable level on 10th day”
t0“okra”
e1“highest population reduction of 68.72 per cent followed by β-cyfluthrin (50.72 %) and bifenthrin (44.19 %)”
e2“leafhopper (Amrasca biguttula biguttula Ishida) of okra”
e3“profenophos at 400 g a. i. ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
The half-life of profenophos residue was 2.16 days.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Outcome
- half-lifee0
- Value
- 2.16 dayse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The half-life was 2.16 days”
t0“okra”
e1“highest population reduction of 68.72 per cent followed by β-cyfluthrin (50.72 %) and bifenthrin (44.19 %)”
e2“leafhopper (Amrasca biguttula biguttula Ishida) of okra”
e3“profenophos at 400 g a. i. ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
The waiting period for safe harvest of okra fruit was 5.10 days.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Outcome
- waiting period for safe harvest of okra fruite0
- Value
- 5.10 dayse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“waiting period for safe harvest of okra fruit was 5.10 days”
t0“okra”
e1“highest population reduction of 68.72 per cent followed by β-cyfluthrin (50.72 %) and bifenthrin (44.19 %)”
e2“leafhopper (Amrasca biguttula biguttula Ishida) of okra”
e3“profenophos at 400 g a. i. ha-1”
The same questions in other papers
bifenthrin · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
insecticide · control · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.