Paper · 1983 · Tropical Pest Management

Studies on the extent of loss and economics of pest management in Okra

K. Srinivasan; N. K. Krishnakumar

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
28
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The extent of insect damage to okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench) and the economics of pest management in this crop have been studied over three seasons in Bangalore, India. The results of insecticide trials show that disulfoton applied at the rate of 1 kg a.i./ha at the time of sowing, followed by an application of 0.1% carbaryl 40, 50 and 65 days after germination during the rainy and late summer seasons and 40 and 55 days after germination during the winter season, gave the maximum crop yield and net income. The benefit:cost ratio was maximum with 0.1% carbaryl during the rainy and late summer seasons and with 0.035% phosalone during the winter season. The application of granular insecticides such as carbofuran and disulfoton without additional control of fruit borer (Earias vittella F.) did not significantly increase the marketable value of the crop over the cost of control. The maximum net return, benefit:cost ratio and relationship between cost of control and yield response, if any, should form the basis for okra pest management systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disulfoton at 1 kg a.i./ha at sowing followed by 0.1% carbaryl sprays gave the maximum okra crop yield and net income.

Treatment
disulfoton applied at the rate of 1 kg a.i./ha at the time of sowing, followed by an application of 0.1% carbaryle0
Outcome
crop yield and net incomee0
Direction
maximume0
Setting
Bangalore, Indiae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“disulfoton applied at the rate of 1 kg a.i./ha at the time of sowing, followed by an application of 0.1% carbaryl 40, 50 and 65 days after germination during the rainy and late summer seasons and 40 and 55 days after germination during the winter season, gave the maximum crop yield and net income”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–531 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bangalore, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 172–188 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The benefit:cost ratio in okra was maximum with 0.1% carbaryl during the rainy and late summer seasons.

Treatment
0.1% carbaryle0
Outcome
benefit:cost ratioe0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
during the rainy and late summer seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The benefit:cost ratio was maximum with 0.1% carbaryl during the rainy and late summer seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–627 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The benefit:cost ratio in okra was maximum with 0.035% phosalone during the winter season.

Treatment
0.035% phosalonee0
Outcome
benefit:cost ratioe0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
during the winter seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The benefit:cost ratio was maximum with 0.1% carbaryl during the rainy and late summer seasons and with 0.035% phosalone during the winter season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–678 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Granular carbofuran and disulfoton applied without additional control of fruit borer did not significantly increase the marketable value of okra over the cost of control.

Treatment
granular insecticides such as carbofuran and disulfotone0
Interactor
fruit borere0pest
Outcome
marketable value of the crop over the cost of controle0
Direction
did not significantly increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of granular insecticides such as carbofuran and disulfoton without additional control of fruit borer (Earias vittella F.) did not significantly increase the marketable value of the crop over the cost of control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–70 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend basing okra pest management systems on maximum net return, benefit:cost ratio and the relationship between cost of control and yield response.

Outcome
okra pest management systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum net return, benefit:cost ratio and relationship between cost of control and yield response, if any, should form the basis for okra pest management systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1074 · show in text ↑

insecticide · control · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

sowing time · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 13 positive, 7 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.