Abstract
This study was aimed to find the effects of 28-epibrassinolide (28-EBL) and salicylic acid on chickpea seedlings subjected to water stress, either alone and supplemented with 28-EBL and Salicylic acid treatments. Combined supplementation of EBL+SA alone also exhibited the significant improvement on chlorophyll content (34.4% of Chl a and 35.5 % of Chl b) than EBL and SA alone treatments compared to the control plants. Control plants receiving the EBL+SA alone treatment showed the significant effect (by 32.8%) than the EBL and SA alone treatment (20.4 % and 11.4% respectively) compared to the control for carotenoid levels. combined supplementation of EBL+SA exhibited the significant improvement of PN (21%; 0.0411, p≤0.05) over their individuals in comparison to control. Co-application of EBL and SA was more effective (44%; 0.0341, p≤0.05) over unstressed control than their individual applications in enhancing gS in control plants. Plants treated with EBL+SA alone showed a marked increase in Ci (by 20%) compared to control plants. Co-application of EBL and SA was more effective (41.2%; 0.0265, p≤0.05) over unstressed control than their individual applications in enhancing E in control plants. Co-application of EBL and SA considerably increased the Fv/Fm and ФPSII in comparison to unstressed control. Control plants treated with EBL+SA exhibited the more impact on Ru BP case activity (33.1%; 0.0411, p≤0.05) over unstressed control than their individual applications over the control plants. Co-application of EBL and SA was more effective (32.4%; 0.0237, p≤0.05) over unstressed control than their individual applications in enhancing FB Pase activity in control plants. Control plants treated with EBL+SA was found to be more effective on the PGK activity by 63.3% (0.0112, p≤0.05) than their individuals (EBL by 52.1% and SA by 36.1%) compared to control. EBL and SA has a more significant effect than their individual applications on the improvement of leaf starch and sucrose concentrations in drought stressed and well-watered plants.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 16
Claim · model-written summary
EBL+SA increased chlorophyll a content by 34.4% relative to control plants, more than EBL or SA alone.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Treatment
- EBL+SAe1
- Outcome
- chlorophyll contente1
- Direction
- improvemente1
- Value
- 34.4%e1
- Qualifier
- Chl ae1
- Comparator
- control plantse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“chickpea seedlings subjected to water stress”
e1“Combined supplementation of EBL+SA alone also exhibited the significant improvement on chlorophyll content (34.4% of Chl a and 35.5 % of Chl b) than EBL and SA alone treatments compared to the control plants”
Claim · model-written summary
EBL+SA increased chlorophyll b content by 35.5% relative to control plants, more than EBL or SA alone.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- EBL+SAe1
- Outcome
- chlorophyll contente1
- Direction
- improvemente1
- Value
- 35.5 %e1
- Qualifier
- Chl be1
- Comparator
- control plantse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“chickpea seedlings subjected to water stress”
e1“Combined supplementation of EBL+SA alone also exhibited the significant improvement on chlorophyll content (34.4% of Chl a and 35.5 % of Chl b) than EBL and SA alone treatments compared to the control plants”
Claim · model-written summary
EBL+SA increased carotenoid levels by 32.8% relative to control.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- EBL+SA alone treatmente1
- Outcome
- carotenoid levelse1
- Direction
- increaseinferrede1
- Value
- 32.8%e1
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“chickpea seedlings subjected to water stress”
e1“Control plants receiving the EBL+SA alone treatment showed the significant effect (by 32.8%) than the EBL and SA alone treatment (20.4 % and 11.4% respectively) compared to the control for carotenoid levels”
Claim · model-written summary
EBL alone increased carotenoid levels by 20.4% relative to control.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- EBLe1
- Outcome
- carotenoid levelse1
- Direction
- increaseinferrede1
- Value
- 20.4 %e1
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“chickpea seedlings subjected to water stress”
e1“Control plants receiving the EBL+SA alone treatment showed the significant effect (by 32.8%) than the EBL and SA alone treatment (20.4 % and 11.4% respectively) compared to the control for carotenoid levels”
Claim · model-written summary
SA alone increased carotenoid levels by 11.4% relative to control.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- SAe1
- Outcome
- carotenoid levelse1
- Direction
- increaseinferrede1
- Value
- 11.4%e1
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“chickpea seedlings subjected to water stress”
e1“Control plants receiving the EBL+SA alone treatment showed the significant effect (by 32.8%) than the EBL and SA alone treatment (20.4 % and 11.4% respectively) compared to the control for carotenoid levels”
Claim · model-written summary
EBL+SA increased PN by 21% over their individual applications compared with control.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- EBL+SAe1
- Outcome
- PNe1
- Direction
- improvemente1
- Value
- 21%e1
- Comparator
- their individualse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“chickpea seedlings subjected to water stress”
e1“combined supplementation of EBL+SA exhibited the significant improvement of PN (21%; 0.0411, p≤0.05) over their individuals in comparison to control”
Claim · model-written summary
Co-application of EBL and SA enhanced gS by 44% over unstressed control, more than their individual applications.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- Co-application of EBL and SAe1
- Outcome
- gSe1
- Direction
- enhancinge1
- Value
- 44%e1
- Comparator
- unstressed controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“chickpea seedlings subjected to water stress”
e1“Co-application of EBL and SA was more effective (44%; 0.0341, p≤0.05) over unstressed control than their individual applications in enhancing gS in control plants”
Claim · model-written summary
EBL+SA alone increased Ci by 20% compared with control plants.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- EBL+SA alonee1
- Outcome
- Cie1
- Direction
- increasee1
- Value
- 20%e1
- Comparator
- control plantse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“chickpea seedlings subjected to water stress”
e1“Plants treated with EBL+SA alone showed a marked increase in Ci (by 20%) compared to control plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Co-application of EBL and SA enhanced E by 41.2% over unstressed control, more than their individual applications.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- Co-application of EBL and SAe1
- Outcome
- Ee1
- Direction
- enhancinge1
- Value
- 41.2%e1
- Comparator
- unstressed controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“chickpea seedlings subjected to water stress”
e1“Co-application of EBL and SA was more effective (41.2%; 0.0265, p≤0.05) over unstressed control than their individual applications in enhancing E in control plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Co-application of EBL and SA increased Fv/Fm and ФPSII compared with unstressed control.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- Co-application of EBL and SAe1
- Outcome
- Fv/Fm and ФPSIIe1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Comparator
- unstressed controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“chickpea seedlings subjected to water stress”
e1“Co-application of EBL and SA considerably increased the Fv/Fm and ФPSII in comparison to unstressed control”
Claim · model-written summary
EBL+SA increased Ru BP case activity by 33.1% over unstressed control.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- EBL+SAe1
- Outcome
- Ru BP case activitye1
- Direction
- increaseinferrede1
- Value
- 33.1%e1
- Comparator
- unstressed controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“chickpea seedlings subjected to water stress”
e1“Control plants treated with EBL+SA exhibited the more impact on Ru BP case activity (33.1%; 0.0411, p≤0.05) over unstressed control than their individual applications over the control plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Co-application of EBL and SA enhanced FB Pase activity by 32.4% over unstressed control, more than their individual applications.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- Co-application of EBL and SAe1
- Outcome
- FB Pase activitye1
- Direction
- enhancinge1
- Value
- 32.4%e1
- Comparator
- unstressed controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“chickpea seedlings subjected to water stress”
e1“Co-application of EBL and SA was more effective (32.4%; 0.0237, p≤0.05) over unstressed control than their individual applications in enhancing FB Pase activity in control plants”
Claim · model-written summary
EBL+SA was more effective than their individual applications at increasing PGK activity by 63.3% compared with control.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- EBL+SAe1
- Outcome
- PGK activitye1
- Direction
- more effectivee1
- Value
- 63.3%e1
- Comparator
- their individualse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“chickpea seedlings subjected to water stress”
e1“Control plants treated with EBL+SA was found to be more effective on the PGK activity by 63.3% (0.0112, p≤0.05) than their individuals (EBL by 52.1% and SA by 36.1%) compared to control”
Claim · model-written summary
EBL alone increased PGK activity by 52.1% compared with control.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- EBLe1
- Outcome
- PGK activitye1
- Direction
- increaseinferrede1
- Value
- 52.1%e1
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“chickpea seedlings subjected to water stress”
e1“Control plants treated with EBL+SA was found to be more effective on the PGK activity by 63.3% (0.0112, p≤0.05) than their individuals (EBL by 52.1% and SA by 36.1%) compared to control”
Claim · model-written summary
SA alone increased PGK activity by 36.1% compared with control.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- SAe1
- Outcome
- PGK activitye1
- Direction
- increaseinferrede1
- Value
- 36.1%e1
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“chickpea seedlings subjected to water stress”
e1“Control plants treated with EBL+SA was found to be more effective on the PGK activity by 63.3% (0.0112, p≤0.05) than their individuals (EBL by 52.1% and SA by 36.1%) compared to control”
Claim · model-written summary
EBL and SA had a more significant effect than their individual applications on improving leaf starch and sucrose concentrations under drought and well-watered conditions.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Organ / stage
- leafe1
- Treatment
- EBL and SAe1
- Outcome
- leaf starch and sucrose concentrationse1
- Direction
- improvemente1
- Qualifier
- drought stressed and well-watered plantse1
- Comparator
- their individual applicationse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“chickpea seedlings subjected to water stress”
e1“EBL and SA has a more significant effect than their individual applications on the improvement of leaf starch and sucrose concentrations in drought stressed and well-watered plants”
The same questions in other papers
24-epi-brassinolide · physiology: pigments · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
24-epi-brassinolide · physiology: enzyme activity · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
salicylic acid · physiology: photosynthesis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
salicylic acid · physiology: enzyme activity · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →salicylic acid · physiology: pigments · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.