Paper · 2020 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Effect of graded levels of potassium and micronutrients on yield, quality and nutrient uptake in pigeon pea through soil and foliar application under Vertisols

S. A. Chavan; Deshmukh; TR Kachave

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during Kharif 2017-18 at Research Farm of Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani on Vertisol to evaluate the “Effect of graded levels of potassium and micronutrients on yield, quality and nutrient uptake in Pigeon pea through soil and foliar application under Vertisols”. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design (RBD) with ten treatments and replicated thrice, The results revealed that, the application of 100% NP + 50 kg K20 ha-1 + Grade-I micronutrient recorded significantly higher grain and dry matter yield followed by 100% NP + 50 kg K20 ha-1 + Grade-II (0.5%) micronutrient. The quality parameters viz. test weight and protein content were found to be higher with the application of 100% NP + 50 kg K20 ha-1 + Grade-I micronutrient. Among the different treatment combinations, the highest uptake of major nutrients was noticed highest in 100% NP + 50 kg K20 ha-1 + Grade-I micronutrient followed by 100% NP + 50 kg K20 ha-1 + Grade II (0.5%) micronutrient.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grade-I micronutrient treatment gave significantly higher grain yield.

Taxon
Pigeon peaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
100% NP + 50 kg K20 ha-1 + Grade-I micronutriente0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
100% NP + 50 kg K20 ha-1 + Grade-II (0.5%) micronutriente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of 100% NP + 50 kg K20 ha-1 + Grade-I micronutrient recorded significantly higher grain and dry matter yield followed by 100% NP + 50 kg K20 ha-1 + Grade-II (0.5%) micronutrient.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–700 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pigeon pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–320 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grade-I micronutrient treatment gave significantly higher dry matter yield.

Taxon
Pigeon peaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
100% NP + 50 kg K20 ha-1 + Grade-I micronutriente0
Outcome
dry matter yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
100% NP + 50 kg K20 ha-1 + Grade-II (0.5%) micronutriente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of 100% NP + 50 kg K20 ha-1 + Grade-I micronutrient recorded significantly higher grain and dry matter yield followed by 100% NP + 50 kg K20 ha-1 + Grade-II (0.5%) micronutrient.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–700 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pigeon pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–320 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grade-I micronutrients increased test weight.

Taxon
Pigeon peaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
100% NP + 50 kg K20 ha-1 + Grade-I micronutriente0
Outcome
test weighte0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“test weight and protein content were found to be higher with the application of 100% NP + 50 kg K20 ha-1 + Grade-I micronutrient.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–858 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pigeon pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–320 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grade-I micronutrients increased protein content.

Taxon
Pigeon peaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
100% NP + 50 kg K20 ha-1 + Grade-I micronutriente0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“test weight and protein content were found to be higher with the application of 100% NP + 50 kg K20 ha-1 + Grade-I micronutrient.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–858 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pigeon pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–320 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grade-I micronutrients gave the highest major nutrient uptake.

Taxon
Pigeon peaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
100% NP + 50 kg K20 ha-1 + Grade-I micronutriente0
Outcome
uptake of major nutrientse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
100% NP + 50 kg K20 ha-1 + Grade II (0.5%) micronutriente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest uptake of major nutrients was noticed highest in 100% NP + 50 kg K20 ha-1 + Grade-I micronutrient followed by 100% NP + 50 kg K20 ha-1 + Grade II (0.5%) micronutrient.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1082 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pigeon pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–320 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: protein · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

micronutrient · nutrient: content · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: grain · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

micronutrient · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.