Abstract
A field experiment was planned and conducted during Kharif 2016-17 to evaluate the “Potassium management through soil application and foliar sprays in red gram under Vertisols”. The experiment was conducted at Departmental Research Farm of Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design with three replications. The nutrient uptake of pigeon pea was significantly enhanced with the application of potassium and Grade I or Grade II micronutrient along with RDF. Application of RDF + 50 kg K2O ha-1 + Grade I micronutrient showed maximum uptake of N, P, K and micronutrients (Fe, Zn, Mn and Cu) in pigeon pea plant and grain, followed by RDF + 50 kg K2O ha-1 + Grade II micronutrient and RDF + 25 kg K2O ha-1 + Grade II micronutrient.Thus, GMR and NMR was maximum when pigeon pea received RDF + 50 kg K2O + Grade I micronutrient application followed by RDF + 50 kg K2O + Grade II micronutrient. Benefit cost ratio (1.82) was higher in treatment RDF + 50 kg K2O + Grade I micronutrient followed by (1.75) RDF + 50 kg K2O + Grade II micronutrient.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Potassium and Grade I or II micronutrients with RDF significantly enhanced nutrient uptake.
- Taxon
- pigeon pea
Cajanus cajane0 - Treatment
- potassium and Grade I or Grade II micronutrient along with RDFe0
- Outcome
- nutrient uptakee0
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The nutrient uptake of pigeon pea was significantly enhanced with the application of potassium and Grade I or Grade II micronutrient along with RDF.”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF plus 50 kg K2O and Grade I micronutrient gave maximum plant and grain nutrient uptake.
- Taxon
- pigeon peaCajanus cajane0
- Organ / stage
- plant and graine0
- Treatment
- RDF + 50 kg K2O ha-1 + Grade I micronutriente0
- Outcome
- uptake of N, P, K and micronutrients (Fe, Zn, Mn and Cu)e0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- RDF + 50 kg K2O ha-1 + Grade II micronutrient and RDF + 25 kg K2O ha-1 + Grade II micronutriente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of RDF + 50 kg K2O ha-1 + Grade I micronutrient showed maximum uptake of N, P, K and micronutrients (Fe, Zn, Mn and Cu) in pigeon pea plant and grain, followed by RDF + 50 kg K2O ha-1 + Grade II micronutrient and RDF + 25 kg K2O ha-1 + Grade II micronutrient.”
Claim · model-written summary
GMR and NMR were maximum with RDF plus 50 kg K2O and Grade I micronutrient.
- Taxon
- pigeon peaCajanus cajane0
- Treatment
- RDF + 50 kg K2O + Grade I micronutriente0
- Outcome
- GMR and NMRe0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- RDF + 50 kg K2O + Grade II micronutriente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“GMR and NMR was maximum when pigeon pea received RDF + 50 kg K2O + Grade I micronutrient application followed by RDF + 50 kg K2O + Grade II micronutrient”
Claim · model-written summary
Benefit cost ratio was 1.82 with Grade I treatment, higher than 1.75 with Grade II treatment.
- Taxon
- pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- RDF + 50 kg K2O + Grade I micronutriente0
- Outcome
- Benefit cost ratioe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1.82e0
- Qualifier
- 1.75e0
- Comparator
- RDF + 50 kg K2O + Grade II micronutriente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Benefit cost ratio (1.82) was higher in treatment RDF + 50 kg K2O + Grade I micronutrient followed by (1.75) RDF + 50 kg K2O + Grade II micronutrient.”
t0“pigeon pea”
The same questions in other papers
potassium · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results
33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
32 papers more in this group
See all 36 papers →fertilization · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results
158 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
162 papers more in this group
See all 166 papers →micronutrient · nutrient: content · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
micronutrient · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →potassium · nutrient: content · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.