Paper · 2025 · Journal of Agriculture Research and Technology

Response of Pigeonpea to Foliar Spray of Nano-Zinc in An Inceptisol

P. R. Shelke; A. G. Durgude; B. M. Kamble; et al.

18
claims
33
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present investigation was undertaken to study the “Response of pigeonpea to foliar spray of NanoZinc in an Inceptisol”. The experiment was conducted at Post Graduate Institute Research Farm, Department of Soil Science, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, during kharif 2023. The experiment was laid out in randomized blockdesign (RBD) with three replications. The experiment consists of ninetreatments viz., (T1) - Absolute control, (T2) - GRDF (25:50:00 N:P2O5:K2O kg ha-1 + Vermicompost @ 1.5 t ha-1), (T3) - GRDF + Two foliar spray of water, (T4) - GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-ZnO @ 1000 ppm, (T5) - GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-ZnO @ 1500 ppm, (T6) - GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-ZnO @ 2000 ppm, (T7) - GRDF + Two foliar spray of Chelated-Zn @ 1000 ppm, (T8) - GRDF + Two foliar spray of Chelated-Zn @ 1500 ppm, (T9) - GRDF + Two foliar spray of Chelated-Zn @ 2000 ppm. As regards growth and yield attributing characters, the chlorophyll content in fresh leaf tissues at 40 DAS (49.38 SPAD value) and at 65 DAS (52.35 SPAD value), number of pods plant-1 (707.33),number of grains pod-1 (3.98), grain yield (38.9 q ha-1) and straw yield (123.59q ha-1) were recorded significantly the highest under treatment (T6) - GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-ZnO @ 2000 ppm. As regards quality parameters significantly the highest protein and test weight of pigeonpea was recorded (21.37% and 8.99 g) respectively in treatment of GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-Zn @ 2000 ppm. The same trend of total uptake of macronutrients N, P and K (199.32 kg ha-1, 42.16 kg ha-1 and 111.40 kg ha-1) , respectively and total uptake of micronutrients viz, Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu (2302.53 g ha-1, 1656.01 g ha-1 , 232.43 g ha-1 and 161.81 g ha-1), respectively were recorded significantly the highest in treatment of GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-Zn @ 2000 ppmwiththe highest gross monetary returns (Rs.365651/-), net monetary returns. However, the treatment of GRDF + two foliar spray of chelated Zn (EDTA) @ 2000 ppm at 30 and 55 DAS to pigeonpea was at par and recorded higher B:C ratio as compare to aforesaid treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

chlorophyll content in fresh leaf tissues at 40 DAS was highest under the T6 nano-zinc treatment (49.38 SPAD value).

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-ZnO @ 2000 ppme0
Outcome
chlorophyll content in fresh leaf tissues at 40 DASe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
49.38 SPAD valuee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As regards growth and yield attributing characters, the chlorophyll content in fresh leaf tissues at 40 DAS (49.38 SPAD value) and at 65 DAS (52.35 SPAD value), number of pods plant-1 (707.33),number of grains pod-1 (3.98), grain yield (38.9 q ha-1) and straw yield (123.59q ha-1) were recorded significantly the highest under treatment (T6) - GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-ZnO @ 2000 ppm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1284 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

chlorophyll content in fresh leaf tissues at 65 DAS was highest under the T6 nano-zinc treatment (52.35 SPAD value).

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-ZnO @ 2000 ppme0
Outcome
chlorophyll content in fresh leaf tissuese0
Direction
higheste0
Value
52.35 SPAD valuee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As regards growth and yield attributing characters, the chlorophyll content in fresh leaf tissues at 40 DAS (49.38 SPAD value) and at 65 DAS (52.35 SPAD value), number of pods plant-1 (707.33),number of grains pod-1 (3.98), grain yield (38.9 q ha-1) and straw yield (123.59q ha-1) were recorded significantly the highest under treatment (T6) - GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-ZnO @ 2000 ppm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1284 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

number of pods plant-1 was highest under the T6 nano-zinc treatment (707.33).

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-ZnO @ 2000 ppme0
Outcome
number of pods plant-1e0
Direction
higheste0
Value
707.33e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As regards growth and yield attributing characters, the chlorophyll content in fresh leaf tissues at 40 DAS (49.38 SPAD value) and at 65 DAS (52.35 SPAD value), number of pods plant-1 (707.33),number of grains pod-1 (3.98), grain yield (38.9 q ha-1) and straw yield (123.59q ha-1) were recorded significantly the highest under treatment (T6) - GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-ZnO @ 2000 ppm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1284 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

number of grains pod-1 was highest under the T6 nano-zinc treatment (3.98).

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-ZnO @ 2000 ppme0
Outcome
number of grains pod-1e0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.98e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As regards growth and yield attributing characters, the chlorophyll content in fresh leaf tissues at 40 DAS (49.38 SPAD value) and at 65 DAS (52.35 SPAD value), number of pods plant-1 (707.33),number of grains pod-1 (3.98), grain yield (38.9 q ha-1) and straw yield (123.59q ha-1) were recorded significantly the highest under treatment (T6) - GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-ZnO @ 2000 ppm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1284 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

grain yield was highest under the T6 nano-zinc treatment (38.9 q ha-1).

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-ZnO @ 2000 ppme0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
38.9 q ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As regards growth and yield attributing characters, the chlorophyll content in fresh leaf tissues at 40 DAS (49.38 SPAD value) and at 65 DAS (52.35 SPAD value), number of pods plant-1 (707.33),number of grains pod-1 (3.98), grain yield (38.9 q ha-1) and straw yield (123.59q ha-1) were recorded significantly the highest under treatment (T6) - GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-ZnO @ 2000 ppm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1284 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

straw yield was highest under the T6 nano-zinc treatment (123.59q ha-1).

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-ZnO @ 2000 ppme0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
123.59q ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As regards growth and yield attributing characters, the chlorophyll content in fresh leaf tissues at 40 DAS (49.38 SPAD value) and at 65 DAS (52.35 SPAD value), number of pods plant-1 (707.33),number of grains pod-1 (3.98), grain yield (38.9 q ha-1) and straw yield (123.59q ha-1) were recorded significantly the highest under treatment (T6) - GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-ZnO @ 2000 ppm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1284 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

protein was highest under nano-zinc treatment (21.37%).

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-Zn @ 2000 ppme0
Outcome
proteine0
Direction
higheste0
Value
21.37%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As regards quality parameters significantly the highest protein and test weight of pigeonpea was recorded (21.37% and 8.99 g) respectively in treatment of GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-Zn @ 2000 ppm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1486 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

test weight was highest under nano-zinc treatment (8.99 g).

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-Zn @ 2000 ppme0
Outcome
test weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
8.99 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As regards quality parameters significantly the highest protein and test weight of pigeonpea was recorded (21.37% and 8.99 g) respectively in treatment of GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-Zn @ 2000 ppm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1486 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total N uptake was highest under nano-zinc treatment (199.32 kg ha-1).

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-Zn @ 2000 ppme0
Outcome
total uptake of macronutrientse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
199.32 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The same trend of total uptake of macronutrients N, P and K (199.32 kg ha-1, 42.16 kg ha-1 and 111.40 kg ha-1) , respectively and total uptake of micronutrients viz, Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu (2302.53 g ha-1, 1656.01 g ha-1 , 232.43 g ha-1 and 161.81 g ha-1), respectively were recorded significantly the highest in treatment of GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-Zn @ 2000 ppmwiththe highest gross monetary returns (Rs.365651/-), net monetary returns.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1928 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total P uptake was highest under nano-zinc treatment (42.16 kg ha-1).

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-Zn @ 2000 ppme0
Outcome
total uptake of macronutrientse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
42.16 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The same trend of total uptake of macronutrients N, P and K (199.32 kg ha-1, 42.16 kg ha-1 and 111.40 kg ha-1) , respectively and total uptake of micronutrients viz, Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu (2302.53 g ha-1, 1656.01 g ha-1 , 232.43 g ha-1 and 161.81 g ha-1), respectively were recorded significantly the highest in treatment of GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-Zn @ 2000 ppmwiththe highest gross monetary returns (Rs.365651/-), net monetary returns.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1928 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total K uptake was highest under nano-zinc treatment (111.40 kg ha-1).

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-Zn @ 2000 ppme0
Outcome
total uptake of macronutrientse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
111.40 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The same trend of total uptake of macronutrients N, P and K (199.32 kg ha-1, 42.16 kg ha-1 and 111.40 kg ha-1) , respectively and total uptake of micronutrients viz, Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu (2302.53 g ha-1, 1656.01 g ha-1 , 232.43 g ha-1 and 161.81 g ha-1), respectively were recorded significantly the highest in treatment of GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-Zn @ 2000 ppmwiththe highest gross monetary returns (Rs.365651/-), net monetary returns.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1928 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total Fe uptake was highest under nano-zinc treatment (2302.53 g ha-1).

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-Zn @ 2000 ppme0
Outcome
total uptake of micronutrientse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2302.53 g ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The same trend of total uptake of macronutrients N, P and K (199.32 kg ha-1, 42.16 kg ha-1 and 111.40 kg ha-1) , respectively and total uptake of micronutrients viz, Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu (2302.53 g ha-1, 1656.01 g ha-1 , 232.43 g ha-1 and 161.81 g ha-1), respectively were recorded significantly the highest in treatment of GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-Zn @ 2000 ppmwiththe highest gross monetary returns (Rs.365651/-), net monetary returns.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1928 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total Mn uptake was highest under nano-zinc treatment (1656.01 g ha-1).

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-Zn @ 2000 ppme0
Outcome
total uptake of micronutrientse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1656.01 g ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The same trend of total uptake of macronutrients N, P and K (199.32 kg ha-1, 42.16 kg ha-1 and 111.40 kg ha-1) , respectively and total uptake of micronutrients viz, Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu (2302.53 g ha-1, 1656.01 g ha-1 , 232.43 g ha-1 and 161.81 g ha-1), respectively were recorded significantly the highest in treatment of GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-Zn @ 2000 ppmwiththe highest gross monetary returns (Rs.365651/-), net monetary returns.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1928 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total Zn uptake was highest under nano-zinc treatment (232.43 g ha-1).

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-Zn @ 2000 ppme0
Outcome
total uptake of micronutrientse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
232.43 g ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The same trend of total uptake of macronutrients N, P and K (199.32 kg ha-1, 42.16 kg ha-1 and 111.40 kg ha-1) , respectively and total uptake of micronutrients viz, Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu (2302.53 g ha-1, 1656.01 g ha-1 , 232.43 g ha-1 and 161.81 g ha-1), respectively were recorded significantly the highest in treatment of GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-Zn @ 2000 ppmwiththe highest gross monetary returns (Rs.365651/-), net monetary returns.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1928 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total Cu uptake was highest under nano-zinc treatment (161.81 g ha-1).

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-Zn @ 2000 ppme0
Outcome
total uptake of micronutrientse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
161.81 g ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The same trend of total uptake of macronutrients N, P and K (199.32 kg ha-1, 42.16 kg ha-1 and 111.40 kg ha-1) , respectively and total uptake of micronutrients viz, Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu (2302.53 g ha-1, 1656.01 g ha-1 , 232.43 g ha-1 and 161.81 g ha-1), respectively were recorded significantly the highest in treatment of GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-Zn @ 2000 ppmwiththe highest gross monetary returns (Rs.365651/-), net monetary returns.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1928 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gross monetary returns were highest under nano-zinc treatment (Rs.365651/-).

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-Zn @ 2000 ppme0
Outcome
gross monetary returnse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Rs.365651/-e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The same trend of total uptake of macronutrients N, P and K (199.32 kg ha-1, 42.16 kg ha-1 and 111.40 kg ha-1) , respectively and total uptake of micronutrients viz, Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu (2302.53 g ha-1, 1656.01 g ha-1 , 232.43 g ha-1 and 161.81 g ha-1), respectively were recorded significantly the highest in treatment of GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-Zn @ 2000 ppmwiththe highest gross monetary returns (Rs.365651/-), net monetary returns.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1928 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net monetary returns were also highest under nano-zinc treatment.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-Zn @ 2000 ppme0
Outcome
net monetary returnse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The same trend of total uptake of macronutrients N, P and K (199.32 kg ha-1, 42.16 kg ha-1 and 111.40 kg ha-1) , respectively and total uptake of micronutrients viz, Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu (2302.53 g ha-1, 1656.01 g ha-1 , 232.43 g ha-1 and 161.81 g ha-1), respectively were recorded significantly the highest in treatment of GRDF + Two foliar spray of Nano-Zn @ 2000 ppmwiththe highest gross monetary returns (Rs.365651/-), net monetary returns.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1928 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chelated zinc at 2000 ppm was at par and gave a higher benefit-cost ratio than the preceding treatment.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
GRDF + two foliar spray of chelated Zn (EDTA) @ 2000 ppme0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
aforesaid treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment of GRDF + two foliar spray of chelated Zn (EDTA) @ 2000 ppm at 30 and 55 DAS to pigeonpea was at par and recorded higher B:C ratio as compare to aforesaid treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1938–2116 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · quality: protein · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

application · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

93 papers: 87 positive, 6 negative or no effect

86 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

89 papers more in this group

See all 93 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: protein · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: grain · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.