Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Effect of different micronutrients and stage of their application on yield and quality of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis)

Chandni V Mori; AR Patel; RC Patel; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An investigation was conducted on cauliflower cv. Pusa Snowball K 1 during Rabi season of the year, 2017-18 at College Farm, College of Horticulture, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Jagudan, Gujarat. In order to find out the effect of different micronutrients and stage of their application on growth, yield and quality of cauliflower. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design with factorial concept (FRBD) keeping two factor viz., stage of application of micronutrients and micronutrients, the first factor with three stage of application of micronutrients i.e. at seedling stage (15 DAS), after transplanting (20 & 35 DAT), at seedling stage (15 DAS) and after transplanting (20 & 35 DAT) while second factor i.e. micronutrients with eight levels thus, making twenty four treatment combinations. Zinc, Boron and Molybedum were applied as foliar sprays indifferent concentrations of Zn(0, 1000 ppm), B(0, 200 ppm) and Mo(0,50 ppm) at three different stages. The individual effect of micronutrient application at different stages as well as their interaction effect on yield and quality of cauliflower cv. ‘Pusa Snowball K 1’ was recorded. The results indicate that micronutrient application at seedling stage (15 DAS) and after transplanting (20 & 35 DAT) gave maximum average weight of curd, yield per plot, yield per hectare and B content were found better with this treatment. Higher dose of micronutrient application was found i.e. @ Zn 1000 ppm + B 200 ppm + Mo 50 ppm superior for yield as well as quality parameters i.e. average weight of curd, yield per plot and per hectare and B content. The interaction effect of stage of micronutrient application and micronutrients were found not significant for all yield and quality parameters. Thus from the present investigation it could be concluded that for successful cultivation of cauliflower, micronutrient should spray at seedling stage (15 DAS) and 20 & 35 DAT for getting better yield and quality. Micronutrients should apply@ Zn 1000 ppm + B 200 ppm + Mo 50 ppm for same.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined seedling and post-transplant micronutrient applications gave the best average weight of curd.

Treatment
micronutrient application at seedling stage (15 DAS) and after transplanting (20 & 35 DAT)e0
Outcome
average weight of curde0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“micronutrient application at seedling stage (15 DAS) and after transplanting (20 & 35 DAT) gave maximum average weight of curd, yield per plot, yield per hectare and B content were found better with this treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1414 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined seedling and post-transplant micronutrient applications gave the best yield per plot.

Treatment
micronutrient application at seedling stage (15 DAS) and after transplanting (20 & 35 DAT)e0
Outcome
yield per plote0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“micronutrient application at seedling stage (15 DAS) and after transplanting (20 & 35 DAT) gave maximum average weight of curd, yield per plot, yield per hectare and B content were found better with this treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1414 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined seedling and post-transplant micronutrient applications gave the best yield per hectare.

Treatment
micronutrient application at seedling stage (15 DAS) and after transplanting (20 & 35 DAT)e0
Outcome
yield per hectaree0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“micronutrient application at seedling stage (15 DAS) and after transplanting (20 & 35 DAT) gave maximum average weight of curd, yield per plot, yield per hectare and B content were found better with this treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1414 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined seedling and post-transplant micronutrient applications gave the best B content.

Treatment
micronutrient application at seedling stage (15 DAS) and after transplanting (20 & 35 DAT)e0
Outcome
B contente0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“micronutrient application at seedling stage (15 DAS) and after transplanting (20 & 35 DAT) gave maximum average weight of curd, yield per plot, yield per hectare and B content were found better with this treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1414 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher micronutrient dose was superior for average weight of curd.

Treatment
Zn 1000 ppm + B 200 ppm + Mo 50 ppme0
Outcome
average weight of curde0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“Higher dose of micronutrient application was found i.e. @ Zn 1000 ppm + B 200 ppm + Mo 50 ppm superior for yield as well as quality parameters i.e. average weight of curd, yield per plot and per hectare and B content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1632 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher micronutrient dose was superior for yield per plot.

Treatment
Zn 1000 ppm + B 200 ppm + Mo 50 ppme0
Outcome
yield per plote0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“Higher dose of micronutrient application was found i.e. @ Zn 1000 ppm + B 200 ppm + Mo 50 ppm superior for yield as well as quality parameters i.e. average weight of curd, yield per plot and per hectare and B content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1632 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher micronutrient dose was superior for yield per hectare.

Treatment
Zn 1000 ppm + B 200 ppm + Mo 50 ppme0
Outcome
per hectaree0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“Higher dose of micronutrient application was found i.e. @ Zn 1000 ppm + B 200 ppm + Mo 50 ppm superior for yield as well as quality parameters i.e. average weight of curd, yield per plot and per hectare and B content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1632 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher micronutrient dose was superior for B content.

Treatment
Zn 1000 ppm + B 200 ppm + Mo 50 ppme0
Outcome
B contente0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“Higher dose of micronutrient application was found i.e. @ Zn 1000 ppm + B 200 ppm + Mo 50 ppm superior for yield as well as quality parameters i.e. average weight of curd, yield per plot and per hectare and B content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1632 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application stage and micronutrient treatment had no significant interaction for yield and quality parameters.

Treatment
stage of micronutrient application and micronutrientse0
Outcome
yield and quality parameterse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“The interaction effect of stage of micronutrient application and micronutrients were found not significant for all yield and quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1634–1777 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend spraying micronutrients at seedling stage and 20 and 35 days after transplanting for better yield and quality.

Treatment
micronutrient should spray at seedling stage (15 DAS) and 20 & 35 DATe0
Outcome
better yield and qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“micronutrient should spray at seedling stage (15 DAS) and 20 & 35 DAT for getting better yield and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1885–1991 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend Zn, B and Mo at the specified doses.

Outcome
Zn 1000 ppm + B 200 ppm + Mo 50 ppme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“Micronutrients should apply@ Zn 1000 ppm + B 200 ppm + Mo 50 ppm for same”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1993–2066 · show in text ↑

molybdenum atom · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

molybdenum atom · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

22 papers: 22 positive, 0 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

35 papers: 35 positive, 0 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

transplanting · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

micronutrient · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

transplanting · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 40 positive, 10 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

micronutrient · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.