Abstract
Abstract Among the most cultivated vegetables, brassicas stand out for their economic and social importance, but they also stand out for their requirement for micronutrients, especially cauliflower. In view of the importance of micronutrients in the development of cauliflower, the objective was to study the effect of treating cauliflower seeds with molybdenum (Mo) through film coating and pelleting techniques on physiological quality and field development and production under different managements. For physiological and seedling quality, twelve treatments were evaluated, in a 2x5+2 factorial scheme: two technologies (film coating and pelleting), five doses (0.5; 1.5; 2.5; 3.5 and 4.5 g of Mo kg-1 of seeds) and two controls (technology without nutrient and untreated seed), with four replications, in a completely randomized design for tests conducted in the laboratory and in randomized blocks for tests in the nursery. For the field, ten treatments were evaluated in a 2x2x2+2 factorial scheme: two seed treatment technologies (film coating and pelleting); two Mo doses (0.5 and 4.5 g kg-1 of seeds), two fertilization managements (as recommended by Trani and coauthors (2022) [4] and fertilization without a Mo source) and two control treatments (untreated seed, one in each management), in a randomized block design, with six replications. The treatment of seeds with Mo did not harm the physiological quality in both film coating and pelleting technologies. However, in the experiment in a protected environment, supplementation with this micronutrient by seeds proved to be unnecessary, as no plants with deficiency symptoms were observed and it did not affect production.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Molybdenum seed treatment through film coating did not harm cauliflower seed physiological quality.
- Taxon
- Cauliflower
Brassica oleracea var. botrytist0 - Treatment
- film coatinge0
- Outcome
- physiological qualitye0
- Direction
- did not harme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The treatment of seeds with Mo did not harm the physiological quality in both film coating and pelleting technologies.”
t0“Cauliflower Seeds”
Claim · model-written summary
Molybdenum seed treatment through pelleting did not harm cauliflower seed physiological quality.
- Taxon
- CauliflowerBrassica oleracea var. botrytist0
- Treatment
- pelletinge0
- Outcome
- physiological qualitye0
- Direction
- did not harme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The treatment of seeds with Mo did not harm the physiological quality in both film coating and pelleting technologies.”
t0“Cauliflower Seeds”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed micronutrient supplementation did not affect cauliflower production in a protected environment.
- Taxon
- CauliflowerBrassica oleracea var. botrytist0
- Treatment
- supplementation with this micronutrient by seedse0
- Outcome
- productione0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
- Setting
- protected environmente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“in the experiment in a protected environment, supplementation with this micronutrient by seeds proved to be unnecessary, as no plants with deficiency symptoms were observed and it did not affect production.”
t0“Cauliflower Seeds”
Claim · model-written summary
No cauliflower plants showed deficiency symptoms in the protected environment experiment.
- Taxon
- CauliflowerBrassica oleracea var. botrytist0
- Outcome
- no plants with deficiency symptoms were observede0
- Setting
- protected environmente0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“in the experiment in a protected environment, supplementation with this micronutrient by seeds proved to be unnecessary, as no plants with deficiency symptoms were observed”
t0“Cauliflower Seeds”
The same questions in other papers
micronutrient · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →storage · quality: general · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.