Paper · 2016 · Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems

Can living mulches in intercropping systems reduce the potential nitrate leaching? Studies of organic cauliflower (Brassica oleraceaL. var.botrytis) and leek (Allium porrumL.) production across European conditions

Yue Xie; Fabio Tittarelli; Peter von Fragstein; et al.

14
claims
23
verbatim quotes
19
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Abstract The effect of introduction strategy for living mulches (LMs) to reduce the potential nitrate leaching was investigated when grown with vegetables with high nitrogen (N) demand and low use efficiency in four European countries: Italy, Slovenia, Germany and Denmark over 2 yr. The plant N uptake and soil nitrate N content at harvest, in the autumn, and in the following spring were measured below open-pollinated and hybrid cultivars of cauliflower and leek crops. The cultivars performed differently over the 2 yr. In Italy and Slovenia, when LM of burr medic or white clover was broad sown (addition design ADD) at the same time as crop transplanting, the N uptake of crops was hampered without increasing the total aboveground N accumulation. Delaying LM sowing by 2.5–4 weeks maintained the N uptake of crops. In Germany, delaying white clover sowing for a month in cauliflower reduced soil nitrate at the start of leaching by 17–33 kg N ha −1 in the ADD design and 25 kg N ha −1 in the substitution design (SUB), where rows of cash crops were replaced by rows of LM. An overwintering LM of grass–clover incorporated in strips and root pruned decreased soil nitrate at the start of the leaching period by 35 kg N ha −1 in cauliflower, and in leek, an LM of dyer's woad decreased the soil nitrate by 55 kg N ha −1 at harvest and 30 kg N ha −1 at the start of leaching. The effect of delayed LM sowing depended on the LM species and system design. Overall, the SUB and ADD designs showed potential to reduce nitrate leaching, whereas the ADD design had stronger competition against either cash crop or LM. The key to reduce soil nitrate N without jeopardizing crop yields may be to identify suitable growing periods, sometimes combined with root pruning, for each LM species and system design. The LM introduction strategy can be used to control competition and reduce the potential leaching, but the performance depends on the intensity of the interspecific competition and the local conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broad sowing of living mulch at crop transplanting hampered crop N uptake in Italy and Slovenia without increasing total aboveground N accumulation.

Treatment
LM of burr medic or white clover was broad sown (addition design ADD) at the same time as crop transplantinge1
Outcome
N uptake of cropse1
Direction
hamperede1
Qualifier
without increasing the total aboveground N accumulatione1
Setting
Italy and Sloveniae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In Italy and Slovenia, when LM of burr medic or white clover was broad sown (addition design ADD) at the same time as crop transplanting, the N uptake of crops was hampered without increasing the total aboveground N accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–752 · show in text ↑
e2

“hybrid cultivars of cauliflower and leek crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–471 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying living mulch sowing by 2.5–4 weeks maintained crop N uptake.

Treatment
Delaying LM sowing by 2.5–4 weekse1
Outcome
N uptake of cropse1
Direction
maintainede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Delaying LM sowing by 2.5–4 weeks maintained the N uptake of crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–820 · show in text ↑
e2

“hybrid cultivars of cauliflower and leek crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–471 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Germany, delaying white clover sowing for a month in cauliflower reduced soil nitrate at the start of leaching by 17–33 kg N ha −1 in the ADD design.

Treatment
delaying white clover sowing for a monthe1
Outcome
soil nitrate at the start of leachinge1
Direction
reducede1
Value
17–33 kg N ha −1e1
Qualifier
ADD designe1
Setting
Germanye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In Germany, delaying white clover sowing for a month in cauliflower reduced soil nitrate at the start of leaching by 17–33 kg N ha −1 in the ADD design and 25 kg N ha −1 in the substitution design (SUB)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–1024 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Germany, delaying white clover sowing for a month in cauliflower reduced soil nitrate at the start of leaching by 25 kg N ha −1 in the substitution design (SUB).

Treatment
delaying white clover sowing for a monthe1
Outcome
soil nitrate at the start of leachinge1
Direction
reducede1
Value
25 kg N ha −1e1
Qualifier
substitution design (SUB)e1
Setting
Germanye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In Germany, delaying white clover sowing for a month in cauliflower reduced soil nitrate at the start of leaching by 17–33 kg N ha −1 in the ADD design and 25 kg N ha −1 in the substitution design (SUB)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–1024 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An overwintering living mulch of grass–clover incorporated in strips and root pruned decreased soil nitrate at the start of the leaching period by 35 kg N ha −1 in cauliflower.

Treatment
An overwintering LM of grass–clover incorporated in strips and root prunede1
Outcome
soil nitrate at the start of the leaching periode1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
35 kg N ha −1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“An overwintering LM of grass–clover incorporated in strips and root pruned decreased soil nitrate at the start of the leaching period by 35 kg N ha −1 in cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In leek, a dyer's woad living mulch decreased soil nitrate by 55 kg N ha −1 at harvest.

Treatment
an LM of dyer's woade1
Outcome
soil nitratee1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
55 kg N ha −1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in leek, an LM of dyer's woad decreased the soil nitrate by 55 kg N ha −1 at harvest and 30 kg N ha −1 at the start of leaching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In leek, a dyer's woad living mulch decreased soil nitrate by 30 kg N ha −1 at the start of leaching.

Treatment
an LM of dyer's woade1
Outcome
soil nitratee1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
30 kg N ha −1e1
Qualifier
at the start of leachinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in leek, an LM of dyer's woad decreased the soil nitrate by 55 kg N ha −1 at harvest and 30 kg N ha −1 at the start of leaching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1378 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effect of delayed living mulch sowing depended on the living mulch species and system design.

Treatment
delayed LM sowinge1
Outcome
effect of delayed LM sowinge1
Qualifier
depended on the LM species and system designe1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The effect of delayed LM sowing depended on the LM species and system design”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1456 · show in text ↑
e2

“hybrid cultivars of cauliflower and leek crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–471 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The subcropping (SUB) and addition (ADD) designs showed potential to reduce nitrate leaching in cauliflower and leek production.

Treatment
SUB and ADD designse1
Outcome
nitrate leachinge1
Direction
reducee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Overall, the SUB and ADD designs showed potential to reduce nitrate leaching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1458–1534 · show in text ↑
e2

“hybrid cultivars of cauliflower and leek crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–471 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The ADD design had stronger interspecific competition against either the cash crop or the living mulch.

Treatment
ADD designe1
Outcome
competition against either cash crop or LMe1
Direction
strongere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the ADD design had stronger competition against either cash crop or LM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1544–1614 · show in text ↑
e2

“hybrid cultivars of cauliflower and leek crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–471 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing soil nitrate without jeopardizing crop yields may depend on identifying suitable growing periods, sometimes with root pruning, for each living mulch species and system design.

Outcome
reduce soil nitrate N without jeopardizing crop yieldse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The key to reduce soil nitrate N without jeopardizing crop yields may be to identify suitable growing periods, sometimes combined with root pruning, for each LM species and system design”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1616–1802 · show in text ↑
e2

“hybrid cultivars of cauliflower and leek crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–471 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The living mulch introduction strategy can be used to control competition and reduce the potential leaching.

Treatment
LM introduction strategye1
Outcome
reduce the potential leachinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The LM introduction strategy can be used to control competition and reduce the potential leaching, but the performance depends on the intensity of the interspecific competition and the local conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1804–2005 · show in text ↑
e2

“hybrid cultivars of cauliflower and leek crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–471 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The performance of the living mulch introduction strategy depends on the intensity of interspecific competition and local conditions.

Treatment
LM introduction strategye1
Outcome
performancee1
Qualifier
depends on the intensity of the interspecific competition and the local conditionse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The LM introduction strategy can be used to control competition and reduce the potential leaching, but the performance depends on the intensity of the interspecific competition and the local conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1804–2005 · show in text ↑
e2

“hybrid cultivars of cauliflower and leek crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–471 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cultivars of cauliflower and leek performed differently over the 2 years.

Material
cultivarse1
Outcome
performed differentlye1
Qualifier
over the 2 yre1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The cultivars performed differently over the 2 yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–522 · show in text ↑
e2

“hybrid cultivars of cauliflower and leek crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–471 · show in text ↑

transplanting · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.