Paper · 2012

Influence of genotype and harvesting age on the mineral dynamics of Brassica oleracea var. acephala cultivated in South Africa

Francis Bayo Lewu; Muinat N. Lewu; Sydney Mavengahama

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The concentration of desirable minerals in vegetables could influence consumers’ preference for certain vegetable species especially in the recent times in South Africa where packaged vegetables are increasingly labelled with the details of their mineral constituents. The agronomic practices and the genotypes used by farmers could therefore influence the quality of their products. Six genotypes of Brassica oleracea var. acephala were cultivated in the Research and Experimental Farm of the University of Zululand, South Africa, to determine the influence of harvest age on the mineral dynamics of the vegetable types. The results of this study indicated that harvesting of B. oleracea fifteen weeks after transplanting could help to capture the highest levels of nutrient concentrations. Analysis of the comparative performance of the six genotypes tested in the study also suggests that genotype 2 showed superior performance in terms of nutrient accumulation. However, an improvement programme via hybridization of genotypes 2 and 3 could help increase the level of zinc to balance iron-to- zinc ratio in both genotypes. Intraspecific hybridization programme that aims to breed for zinc improvement on genotype 2 could also be of advantage in a situation where food based strategy is the main target to addressing iron and zinc deficiencies especially among financially challenged population groups. The current study is the first literature on the mineral dynamics among genotypes of B. oleracea var. acephala in northern KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvesting B. oleracea fifteen weeks after transplanting could capture the highest nutrient concentrations.

Taxon
Brassica oleracea var. acephalaBrassica oleracea var. viridise0
Treatment
fifteen weeks after transplantinge1
Outcome
nutrient concentrationse1
Direction
higheste1
Qualifier
could help to capturee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Six genotypes of Brassica oleracea var. acephala were cultivated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–448 · show in text ↑
e1

“harvesting of B. oleracea fifteen weeks after transplanting could help to capture the highest levels of nutrient concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–790 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype 2 showed superior nutrient accumulation among the six genotypes tested.

Taxon
Brassica oleracea var. acephalaBrassica oleracea var. viridise0
Material
genotype 2e2
Outcome
nutrient accumulatione2
Direction
superiore2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Six genotypes of Brassica oleracea var. acephala were cultivated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–448 · show in text ↑
e2

“Analysis of the comparative performance of the six genotypes tested in the study also suggests that genotype 2 showed superior performance in terms of nutrient accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–964 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Hybridization of genotypes 2 and 3 could increase zinc level and balance the iron-to-zinc ratio in both genotypes.

Taxon
Brassica oleracea var. acephalaBrassica oleracea var. viridise0
Material
genotypes 2 and 3e3
Treatment
hybridizatione3
Outcome
level of zince3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Six genotypes of Brassica oleracea var. acephala were cultivated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–448 · show in text ↑
e3

“an improvement programme via hybridization of genotypes 2 and 3 could help increase the level of zinc to balance iron-to-zinc ratio in both genotypes”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 975–1125 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Intraspecific hybridization aiming at zinc improvement in genotype 2 could be advantageous for a food-based strategy against iron and zinc deficiencies.

Taxon
Brassica oleracea var. acephalaBrassica oleracea var. viridise0
Material
genotype 2e4
Treatment
Intraspecific hybridization programmee4
Outcome
advantagee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Six genotypes of Brassica oleracea var. acephala were cultivated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–448 · show in text ↑
e4

“Intraspecific hybridization programme that aims to breed for zinc improvement on genotype 2 could also be of advantage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1245 · show in text ↑

transplanting · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.