Abstract
The field experiment was conducted at experimental farm, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola during rabi season 2017-18, to find out the effect of different organic manures and nutrient management practices on growth, yield and quality parameter of safflower under rainfed condition. Experimental finding revealed that, among the different sources organic manures, the treatment with application of FYM @ 5 t ha-1 registered significantly higher in growth attributes viz. plant height (75.78 cm), number of branches plant-1 (15.58), leaf area plant-1 (37.60 dm2), dry matter accumulation plant-1 (67.24 g), seed yield (1745 kg ha-1), straw yield (4661 kg ha-1), biological yield (6406 kg ha-1), harvest index (27.21%) and quality character i.e. oil content (28.16%) and protein content (12.82%) as compared to treatment of no manure. However, it was found statistically similar with greengram residue incorporation treatment. Significantly lowest growth attributes, yield and quality parameter were displayed with the treatment of no manure. Out of five nutrient management treatments, application of fertilizer with SSNM (STCR equation) + (ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + S @ 10 kg ha-1) produced significantly highest growth attributes such as plant height (80.42 cm), number of branches plant-1 (17.43), and dry matter accumulation plant-1 (70.37 g), seed yield (1818 kg ha-1), straw yield (4948 kg ha-1), biological yield (6767 kg ha-1) and harvest index (26.86%), which was found statistically identical with treatment of SSNM (STCR equation) superior over other nutrient management treatments. In case of leaf area plant-1 (40.24 dm2), oil content (29.49%) and protein content (13.11%) were recorded significantly highest with fertilizer applied in SSNM (STCR equation) + (ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + S @ 10 kg ha-1) than rest remaining treatments. The lowest value in respect of growth attributes, yield and quality parameter of safflower were recorded under treatment of no fertilizer.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 17
Claim · model-written summary
In safflower under rainfed conditions, FYM at 5 t/ha gave significantly higher growth attributes (plant height 75.78 cm, branches per plant 15.58, leaf area per plant 37.60 dm2, dry matter per plant 67.24 g) than no manure.
- Taxon
- safflower
Carthamus tinctoriust0 - Treatment
- application of FYM @ 5 t ha-1e0
- Outcome
- growth attributese1
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- no manuree2
Not reportedValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of FYM @ 5 t ha-1 registered significantly higher”
e1“growth attributes viz. plant height (75.78 cm), number of branches plant-1 (15.58), leaf area plant-1 (37.60 dm2), dry matter accumulation plant-1 (67.24 g)”
e2“as compared to treatment of no manure”
t0“safflower”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM at 5 t/ha gave significantly higher safflower seed yield (1745 kg/ha) than no manure.
- Taxon
- safflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Treatment
- application of FYM @ 5 t ha-1e0
- Outcome
- seed yielde1
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1745 kg ha-1e1
- Comparator
- no manuree2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of FYM @ 5 t ha-1 registered significantly higher”
e1“seed yield (1745 kg ha-1)”
e2“as compared to treatment of no manure”
t0“safflower”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM at 5 t/ha gave significantly higher safflower straw yield (4661 kg/ha) than no manure.
- Taxon
- safflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Treatment
- application of FYM @ 5 t ha-1e0
- Outcome
- straw yielde1
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 4661 kg ha-1e1
- Comparator
- no manuree2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of FYM @ 5 t ha-1 registered significantly higher”
e1“straw yield (4661 kg ha-1)”
e2“as compared to treatment of no manure”
t0“safflower”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM at 5 t/ha gave significantly higher safflower biological yield (6406 kg/ha) than no manure.
- Taxon
- safflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Treatment
- application of FYM @ 5 t ha-1e0
- Outcome
- biological yielde1
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 6406 kg ha-1e1
- Comparator
- no manuree2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of FYM @ 5 t ha-1 registered significantly higher”
e1“biological yield (6406 kg ha-1)”
e2“as compared to treatment of no manure”
t0“safflower”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM at 5 t/ha gave significantly higher safflower harvest index (27.21%) than no manure.
- Taxon
- safflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Treatment
- application of FYM @ 5 t ha-1e0
- Outcome
- harvest indexe1
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 27.21%e1
- Comparator
- no manuree2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of FYM @ 5 t ha-1 registered significantly higher”
e1“harvest index (27.21%)”
e2“as compared to treatment of no manure”
t0“safflower”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM at 5 t/ha gave significantly higher safflower oil content (28.16%) than no manure.
- Taxon
- safflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Treatment
- application of FYM @ 5 t ha-1e0
- Outcome
- oil contente1
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 28.16%e1
- Comparator
- no manuree2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of FYM @ 5 t ha-1 registered significantly higher”
e1“oil content (28.16%)”
e2“as compared to treatment of no manure”
t0“safflower”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM at 5 t/ha gave significantly higher safflower protein content (12.82%) than no manure.
- Taxon
- safflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Treatment
- application of FYM @ 5 t ha-1e0
- Outcome
- protein contente1
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 12.82%e1
- Comparator
- no manuree2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of FYM @ 5 t ha-1 registered significantly higher”
e1“protein content (12.82%)”
e2“as compared to treatment of no manure”
t0“safflower”
Claim · model-written summary
The FYM 5 t/ha treatment was statistically similar to the greengram residue incorporation treatment in safflower.
- Taxon
- safflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Treatment
- FYM @ 5 t ha-1e0
- Outcome
- statistically similare1
- Direction
- statistically similare1
- Comparator
- greengram residue incorporation treatmente1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of FYM @ 5 t ha-1 registered significantly higher”
e1“it was found statistically similar with greengram residue incorporation treatment”
t0“safflower”
Claim · model-written summary
SSNM (STCR equation) plus ZnSO4 25 kg/ha and S 10 kg/ha gave significantly highest safflower growth attributes (plant height 80.42 cm, branches per plant 17.43, dry matter per plant 70.37 g) among nutrient management treatments.
- Taxon
- safflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Treatment
- fertilizer with SSNM (STCR equation) + (ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + S @ 10 kg ha-1)e0
- Outcome
- growth attributese1
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- other nutrient management treatmentse2
Not reportedValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of fertilizer with SSNM (STCR equation) + (ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + S @ 10 kg ha-1) produced significantly highest”
e1“growth attributes such as plant height (80.42 cm), number of branches plant-1 (17.43), and dry matter accumulation plant-1 (70.37 g)”
e2“superior over other nutrient management treatments”
t0“safflower”
Claim · model-written summary
SSNM (STCR equation) plus ZnSO4 and S gave the significantly highest safflower seed yield (1818 kg/ha).
- Taxon
- safflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Treatment
- fertilizer with SSNM (STCR equation) + (ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + S @ 10 kg ha-1)e0
- Outcome
- seed yielde1
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1818 kg ha-1e1
- Comparator
- other nutrient management treatmentse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of fertilizer with SSNM (STCR equation) + (ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + S @ 10 kg ha-1) produced significantly highest”
e1“seed yield (1818 kg ha-1)”
e2“superior over other nutrient management treatments”
t0“safflower”
Claim · model-written summary
SSNM (STCR equation) plus ZnSO4 and S gave the significantly highest safflower straw yield (4948 kg/ha).
- Taxon
- safflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Treatment
- fertilizer with SSNM (STCR equation) + (ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + S @ 10 kg ha-1)e0
- Outcome
- straw yielde1
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 4948 kg ha-1e1
- Comparator
- other nutrient management treatmentse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of fertilizer with SSNM (STCR equation) + (ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + S @ 10 kg ha-1) produced significantly highest”
e1“straw yield (4948 kg ha-1)”
e2“superior over other nutrient management treatments”
t0“safflower”
Claim · model-written summary
SSNM (STCR equation) plus ZnSO4 and S gave the significantly highest safflower biological yield (6767 kg/ha).
- Taxon
- safflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Treatment
- fertilizer with SSNM (STCR equation) + (ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + S @ 10 kg ha-1)e0
- Outcome
- biological yielde1
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 6767 kg ha-1e1
- Comparator
- other nutrient management treatmentse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of fertilizer with SSNM (STCR equation) + (ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + S @ 10 kg ha-1) produced significantly highest”
e1“biological yield (6767 kg ha-1)”
e2“superior over other nutrient management treatments”
t0“safflower”
Claim · model-written summary
SSNM (STCR equation) plus ZnSO4 and S gave the highest safflower harvest index (26.86%).
- Taxon
- safflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Treatment
- fertilizer with SSNM (STCR equation) + (ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + S @ 10 kg ha-1)e0
- Outcome
- harvest indexe1
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 26.86%e1
- Comparator
- other nutrient management treatmentse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of fertilizer with SSNM (STCR equation) + (ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + S @ 10 kg ha-1) produced significantly highest”
e1“harvest index (26.86%)”
e2“superior over other nutrient management treatments”
t0“safflower”
Claim · model-written summary
SSNM (STCR equation) plus ZnSO4 and S gave significantly highest safflower leaf area per plant (40.24 dm2) than the remaining treatments.
- Taxon
- safflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Treatment
- fertilizer applied in SSNM (STCR equation) + (ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + S @ 10 kg ha-1)e1
- Outcome
- leaf area plant-1e0
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 40.24 dm2e0
- Comparator
- rest remaining treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“leaf area plant-1 (40.24 dm2)”
e1“significantly highest with fertilizer applied in SSNM (STCR equation) + (ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + S @ 10 kg ha-1) than rest remaining treatments”
t0“safflower”
Claim · model-written summary
SSNM (STCR equation) plus ZnSO4 and S gave significantly highest safflower oil content (29.49%) than the remaining treatments.
- Taxon
- safflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Treatment
- fertilizer applied in SSNM (STCR equation) + (ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + S @ 10 kg ha-1)e1
- Outcome
- oil contente0
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 29.49%e0
- Comparator
- rest remaining treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“oil content (29.49%)”
e1“significantly highest with fertilizer applied in SSNM (STCR equation) + (ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + S @ 10 kg ha-1) than rest remaining treatments”
t0“safflower”
Claim · model-written summary
SSNM (STCR equation) plus ZnSO4 and S gave significantly highest safflower protein content (13.11%) than the remaining treatments.
- Taxon
- safflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Treatment
- fertilizer applied in SSNM (STCR equation) + (ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + S @ 10 kg ha-1)e1
- Outcome
- protein contente0
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 13.11%e0
- Comparator
- rest remaining treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“protein content (13.11%)”
e1“significantly highest with fertilizer applied in SSNM (STCR equation) + (ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + S @ 10 kg ha-1) than rest remaining treatments”
t0“safflower”
Claim · model-written summary
The SSNM (STCR equation) plus ZnSO4 and S treatment was statistically identical with SSNM (STCR equation) alone for the safflower traits listed.
- Taxon
- safflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Treatment
- fertilizer with SSNM (STCR equation) + (ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + S @ 10 kg ha-1)e0
- Outcome
- statistically identicale1
- Direction
- statistically identicale1
- Comparator
- SSNM (STCR equation)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of fertilizer with SSNM (STCR equation) + (ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + S @ 10 kg ha-1) produced significantly highest”
e1“statistically identical with treatment of SSNM (STCR equation)”
t0“safflower”
The same questions in other papers
zinc sulfate · quality: protein · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
zinc sulfate · quality: oil · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
zinc sulfate · growth · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →zinc sulfate · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →fertilization · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results differ
70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
68 papers more in this group
See all 72 papers →fertilization · quality: oil · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →fertilization · growth · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results
33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
32 papers more in this group
See all 36 papers →fertilization · quality: protein · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.