Paper · 2020 · Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology

Weed Dynamics in Bt cotton under Moisture Conservation and Integrated Nutrient Management Practices

Ch. Pragathi Kumari; K. B. Suneetha Devi; K. Bhanu Rekha; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field investigation was conducted to evaluate the effect of moisture conservation practices [flat bed sowing, ridge and furrow, broad bed and furrow (BBF) and poly mulch on BBF] and integrated nutrient management treatments [Farmer’s practice, 100% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) of 150:60:60 NPK kg ha-1, 125% RDF, 100% RDF along with 25% N through Farm Yard Manure (FYM) or press mud] and their combined effect on weed dynamics of Bt cotton at College Farm, Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University (PJTSAU), Telangana, India. The experiment was laid out in strip-plot design and replicated thrice. Pooled data of the two years (2015 and 2016) indicated that poly mulch on broad bed (M4) registered significantly lower weed density and dry weight at 30 days after sowing (DAS) and it was followed by broad bed and furrow (M3) which was at par with flat bed (M1) and ridge and furrow (M2) methods. Among nutrient management practices, lower weed density was recorded with the application of 100% RDF (S2) followed by 125% RDF (S3) and 100% RDF (S5) along with pressmud equivalent to 25% RDN (S5). However, the interaction effect on weed density and drymatter was found to be non-significant at 30 DAS. Contrary to this, at 60 and 90 DAS, the interaction was found to be significant. At 60 DAS, poly mulch on broad bed (M4S2) along with 100% RDF and poly mulch on broad bed (M4S3) along with 125% RDF recorded lower weed density over other treatment combinations. At 90 DAS also similar results were observed with respect to weed density. However, lower weed dry weight was observed with poly mulch on broad bed (M4S3) along with 125% RDF.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Poly mulch on broad bed significantly lowered weed density at 30 DAS.

Taxon
Bt cottont0
Organ / stage
30 days after sowing (DAS)e0
Treatment
poly mulch on broad bed (M4)e0
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“poly mulch on broad bed (M4) registered significantly lower weed density and dry weight at 30 days after sowing (DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–808 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Poly mulch on broad bed significantly lowered weed dry weight at 30 DAS.

Taxon
Bt cottont0
Organ / stage
30 days after sowing (DAS)e0
Treatment
poly mulch on broad bed (M4)e0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“poly mulch on broad bed (M4) registered significantly lower weed density and dry weight at 30 days after sowing (DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–808 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broad bed and furrow followed poly mulch for weed suppression and was at par with flat bed and ridge and furrow.

Taxon
Bt cottont0
Treatment
broad bed and furrow (M3)e0
Outcome
at pare0
Direction
at pare0
Comparator
flat bed (M1) and ridge and furrow (M2) methodse0

Verbatim

t0

“Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“it was followed by broad bed and furrow (M3) which was at par with flat bed (M1) and ridge and furrow (M2) methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–927 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 100% RDF produced the lowest weed density among nutrient management treatments.

Taxon
Bt cottont0
Treatment
application of 100% RDF (S2)e0
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
125% RDF (S3)e0

Verbatim

t0

“Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“lower weed density was recorded with the application of 100% RDF (S2) followed by 125% RDF (S3) and 100% RDF (S5) along with pressmud equivalent to 25% RDN (S5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1126 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The moisture-by-nutrient interaction for weed density at 30 DAS was not significant.

Taxon
Bt cottont0
Organ / stage
30 DASe0
Outcome
interaction effect on weed densitye0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“the interaction effect on weed density and drymatter was found to be non-significant at 30 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1231 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The moisture-by-nutrient interaction for weed dry matter at 30 DAS was not significant.

Taxon
Bt cottont0
Organ / stage
30 DASe0
Outcome
drymattere0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“the interaction effect on weed density and drymatter was found to be non-significant at 30 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1231 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment interaction was significant at 60 DAS.

Taxon
Bt cottont0
Organ / stage
60e0
Outcome
interactione0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“at 60 and 90 DAS, the interaction was found to be significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1312 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment interaction was significant at 90 DAS.

Taxon
Bt cottont0
Organ / stage
90 DASe0
Outcome
interactione0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“at 60 and 90 DAS, the interaction was found to be significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1312 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poly mulch on broad bed with 100% RDF lowered weed density at 60 DAS relative to other combinations.

Taxon
Bt cottont0
Organ / stage
60 DASe0
Treatment
poly mulch on broad bed (M4S2) along with 100% RDFe0
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
other treatment combinationse0

Verbatim

t0

“Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“At 60 DAS, poly mulch on broad bed (M4S2) along with 100% RDF and poly mulch on broad bed (M4S3) along with 125% RDF recorded lower weed density over other treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1492 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poly mulch on broad bed with 125% RDF lowered weed density at 60 DAS relative to other combinations.

Taxon
Bt cottont0
Organ / stage
60 DASe0
Treatment
poly mulch on broad bed (M4S3) along with 125% RDFe0
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
other treatment combinationse0

Verbatim

t0

“Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“At 60 DAS, poly mulch on broad bed (M4S2) along with 100% RDF and poly mulch on broad bed (M4S3) along with 125% RDF recorded lower weed density over other treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1492 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same lower weed density pattern occurred at 90 DAS.

Taxon
Bt cottont0
Organ / stage
90 DASe0
Outcome
weed densitye0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“At 90 DAS also similar results were observed with respect to weed density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1494–1567 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poly mulch on broad bed with 125% RDF produced lower weed dry weight.

Taxon
Bt cottont0
Treatment
poly mulch on broad bed (M4S3) along with 125% RDFe0
Outcome
weed dry weighte0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“lower weed dry weight was observed with poly mulch on broad bed (M4S3) along with 125% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1578–1668 · show in text ↑

fertilization · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

mulching · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 30 positive, 2 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

mulching · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.