Paper · 2011 · Journal of Plant Production

EFFECT OF SOWING DATES AND MINERAL SULPHUR FERTILIZER ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF SUGAR BEET UNDER NEWLY RECLAIMED SOILS

A. Osman

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field trials were conducted out in 2009/2010 and 2010/2011 seasons at Kom Osheim, El-Fayoum Governorate to study the effect of three sowing dates (1st October; 15th October and 1st November) and soil application of sulphur fertilizer in the form of Calcium poly sulfide CaSO4 (30% sulphur) at the levels of (zero, 125 and 250 kg CaSO4/fed, mixed with soil) which were applied at 45 and 75 days age, on Kawemira variety. A split plot design with four replicates in both seasons was used. The main plots were assigned to sowing dates, whereas, soil application with CaSO4 in the sub plots. The results indicated that: early sowing dates at 1st October significantly increased root diameter, root fresh weight/plant, as well as, root and sugar yields/fed, while, mineral contents SO4% and N% were significantly decreased as compared with the other two sowing dates 15th October and 1st November. While, sown sugar beet at 15th October gave the highest sugar% in both seasons, respectively. Soil application with sulphur (CaSO4) level up to 250 kg CaSO4/fed significantly increased root diameter, root fresh weight/plant, sucrose% andyields/fed (root and sugar), while, minerals content of SO4% and N% were increased as compared with control and sulphur (CaSO4) level with 125 kg CaSO4/fed in both seasons, respectively. The interaction between early sowing date at 1st October and soil application with 250 kg CaSO4/fed significantly increased sucrose%, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing on 1 October significantly increased root diameter and fresh weight compared with later dates.

Treatment
1st Octobere0
Outcome
root diameter, root fresh weight/plante0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
15th October and 1st Novembere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“early sowing dates at 1st October significantly increased root diameter, root fresh weight/plant, as well as, root and sugar yields/fed, while, mineral contents SO4% and N% were significantly decreased as compared with the other two sowing dates 15th October and 1st November.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–896 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing on 1 October significantly increased root and sugar yield per feddan.

Treatment
1st Octobere0
Outcome
root and sugar yields/fede0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
15th October and 1st Novembere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“early sowing dates at 1st October significantly increased root diameter, root fresh weight/plant, as well as, root and sugar yields/fed, while, mineral contents SO4% and N% were significantly decreased as compared with the other two sowing dates 15th October and 1st November.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–896 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing on 1 October significantly decreased sulphate and nitrogen percentages compared with later dates.

Treatment
1st Octobere0
Outcome
SO4% and N%e0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
15th October and 1st Novembere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“early sowing dates at 1st October significantly increased root diameter, root fresh weight/plant, as well as, root and sugar yields/fed, while, mineral contents SO4% and N% were significantly decreased as compared with the other two sowing dates 15th October and 1st November.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–896 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing on 15 October gave the highest sugar percentage in both seasons.

Treatment
15th Octobere0
Outcome
sugar%e0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sown sugar beet at 15th October gave the highest sugar% in both seasons, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur at 250 kg CaSO4/fed significantly increased root diameter and fresh weight compared with lower rates.

Treatment
sulphur (CaSO4) level up to 250 kg CaSO4/fede0
Outcome
root diameter, root fresh weight/plante0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control and sulphur (CaSO4) level with 125 kg CaSO4/fede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil application with sulphur (CaSO4) level up to 250 kg CaSO4/fed significantly increased root diameter, root fresh weight/plant, sucrose% andyields/fed (root and sugar), while, minerals content of SO4% and N% were increased as compared with control and sulphur (CaSO4) level with 125 kg CaSO4/fed in both seasons, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1320 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur at 250 kg CaSO4/fed significantly increased sucrose percentage compared with lower rates.

Treatment
sulphur (CaSO4) level up to 250 kg CaSO4/fede0
Outcome
sucrose%e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control and sulphur (CaSO4) level with 125 kg CaSO4/fede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil application with sulphur (CaSO4) level up to 250 kg CaSO4/fed significantly increased root diameter, root fresh weight/plant, sucrose% andyields/fed (root and sugar), while, minerals content of SO4% and N% were increased as compared with control and sulphur (CaSO4) level with 125 kg CaSO4/fed in both seasons, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1320 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur at 250 kg CaSO4/fed significantly increased root and sugar yields compared with lower rates.

Treatment
sulphur (CaSO4) level up to 250 kg CaSO4/fede0
Outcome
yields/fed (root and sugar)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control and sulphur (CaSO4) level with 125 kg CaSO4/fede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil application with sulphur (CaSO4) level up to 250 kg CaSO4/fed significantly increased root diameter, root fresh weight/plant, sucrose% andyields/fed (root and sugar), while, minerals content of SO4% and N% were increased as compared with control and sulphur (CaSO4) level with 125 kg CaSO4/fed in both seasons, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1320 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur at 250 kg CaSO4/fed increased sulphate and nitrogen percentages compared with lower rates.

Treatment
250 kg CaSO4/fede0
Outcome
SO4% and N%e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control and sulphur (CaSO4) level with 125 kg CaSO4/fede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil application with sulphur (CaSO4) level up to 250 kg CaSO4/fed significantly increased root diameter, root fresh weight/plant, sucrose% andyields/fed (root and sugar), while, minerals content of SO4% and N% were increased as compared with control and sulphur (CaSO4) level with 125 kg CaSO4/fed in both seasons, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1320 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of 1 October sowing and 250 kg CaSO4/fed significantly increased sucrose percentage and root and sugar yields.

Treatment
early sowing date at 1st October and soil application with 250 kg CaSO4/fede0
Outcome
sucrose%, root and sugar yields/fede0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction between early sowing date at 1st October and soil application with 250 kg CaSO4/fed significantly increased sucrose%, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1497 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 17 positive, 5 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 39 positive, 3 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

sulfur atom · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

calcium sulfate · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

sowing time · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 20 positive, 6 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

application · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

120 papers: 112 positive, 8 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.