Paper · 2005

Effect of Applying Sulfur Fertilizer on Sugarbeet

Liang Rui-fen

3
claims
3
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Application of sulfur fertilizer showed a positive effect on the increase of root yield, sugar content and sugar yield in sugarbeet. The result indicated that root yield, sugar content and sugar yield of sugarbeet increased by 14.2%-16.6%, 0.6-0.7 °S and 19.7%-21.2%, respectively, as the treatment of applying 90 kg quick gypsum or 30 kg sulphur per ha in comparison with control treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 90 kg quick gypsum or 30 kg sulphur per hectare increased root yield by 14.2%-16.6% compared with control.

Treatment
applying 90 kg quick gypsum or 30 kg sulphur per hae0
Outcome
root yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
14.2%-16.6%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root yield, sugar content and sugar yield of sugarbeet increased by 14.2%-16.6%, 0.6-0.7 °S and 19.7%-21.2%, respectively, as the treatment of applying 90 kg quick gypsum or 30 kg sulphur per ha in comparison with control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–390 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 90 kg quick gypsum or 30 kg sulphur per hectare increased sugar content by 0.6-0.7 °S compared with control.

Treatment
applying 90 kg quick gypsum or 30 kg sulphur per hae0
Outcome
sugar contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.6-0.7 °Se0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root yield, sugar content and sugar yield of sugarbeet increased by 14.2%-16.6%, 0.6-0.7 °S and 19.7%-21.2%, respectively, as the treatment of applying 90 kg quick gypsum or 30 kg sulphur per ha in comparison with control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–390 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 90 kg quick gypsum or 30 kg sulphur per hectare increased sugar yield by 19.7%-21.2% compared with control.

Treatment
applying 90 kg quick gypsum or 30 kg sulphur per hae0
Outcome
sugar yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
19.7%-21.2%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root yield, sugar content and sugar yield of sugarbeet increased by 14.2%-16.6%, 0.6-0.7 °S and 19.7%-21.2%, respectively, as the treatment of applying 90 kg quick gypsum or 30 kg sulphur per ha in comparison with control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–390 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

lime · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

lime · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.