Paper · 2013 · Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering

EFFECT OF SOIL AMENDMENTS AND ANHYDROUS AMMONIA APPLICATION AND THEIR INTERACTIONS ON SOME SOIL PROPERTIES AND WHEAT PRODUCTIVITY UNDER SALT AFFECTED SOILCONDITIONS

A. O. A. Ismail; F. A. Farag; A. H. A. Hassanein; et al.

14
claims
25
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Rehabilitation of saline–sodic soils is governed by a lot of management schemes which involve mainly addition of chemical ameliorates as gypsum and sulphuric acid "SA". The recent studies recommended the use of practices package that lead to improve soil health and reduce production costs besides increasing soil-water-fertilizer unit uses. Therefore, under saline-sodic soil conditions the current study was planned to compare the effect of gypsum application (75% of gypsum requirements) and sulphuric acid (20% of the applied gypsum) under three levels of N-fertilizer, 70, 90, 110 kg N/fed., in form of anhydrous ammonia "AA" on soil salinity-sodicity status and wheat (Triticum aestivum L., Sakha 93) production. A split block experimental design with three replications was used to evaluate the tested treatments and their interactions. Irrigation water amount during winter growing season was measured to assess water productivity (WP) of wheat crop under various soil treatments. Results showed almost significant effect of soil amendments application and different N-levels and their interactions on the studied soil parameters (ECe & SAR), wheat yield and its attributes, nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), as well as water productivity. In general, Results revealed also that, effect of the concerned amendments on ECe, SAR values, plant characters, NUE and WP was higher than those of N-levels. However, sulphuric acid application resulted in an increase of wheat grain yield, NUE & WP, by about 56% and 25 %, respectively as compared to un-amended and gypsum treatments. With regard to the interaction effect of the applied treatments on the tested parameters results indicated that the highest values of plant parameters, grain yield production, WP and the lowest values of soil salinity/sodicity parameters were recorded with the 110 kg N/fed + SA applications, while, the highest value of NUE was obtained with the combined effect of 70 kg N/fed and SA applications.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil amendments, nitrogen levels and their interactions had almost significant effects on soil ECe and SAR.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L., Sakha 93)Triticum aestivume1
Treatment
soil amendments application and different N-levels and their interactionse0
Outcome
soil parameters (ECe & SAR)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed almost significant effect of soil amendments application and different N-levels and their interactions on the studied soil parameters (ECe & SAR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1149 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L., Sakha 93)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–706 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil amendments, nitrogen levels and their interactions had almost significant effects on wheat yield and its attributes.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L., Sakha 93)Triticum aestivume1
Treatment
soil amendments application and different N-levels and their interactionse0
Outcome
wheat yield and its attributese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed almost significant effect of soil amendments application and different N-levels and their interactions on the studied soil parameters (ECe & SAR), wheat yield and its attributes, nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), as well as water productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1243 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L., Sakha 93)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–706 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil amendments, nitrogen levels and their interactions had almost significant effects on nitrogen use efficiency.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L., Sakha 93)Triticum aestivume1
Treatment
soil amendments application and different N-levels and their interactionse0
Outcome
nitrogen use efficiency (NUE)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed almost significant effect of soil amendments application and different N-levels and their interactions on the studied soil parameters (ECe & SAR), wheat yield and its attributes, nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), as well as water productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1243 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L., Sakha 93)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–706 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil amendments, nitrogen levels and their interactions had almost significant effects on water productivity.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L., Sakha 93)Triticum aestivume1
Treatment
soil amendments application and different N-levels and their interactionse0
Outcome
water productivitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed almost significant effect of soil amendments application and different N-levels and their interactions on the studied soil parameters (ECe & SAR), wheat yield and its attributes, nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), as well as water productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1243 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L., Sakha 93)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–706 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amendments affected ECe and SAR more than nitrogen levels did.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L., Sakha 93)Triticum aestivume1
Treatment
concerned amendmentse0
Outcome
ECe, SAR valuese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
N-levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of the concerned amendments on ECe, SAR values, plant characters, NUE and WP was higher than those of N-levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1402 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L., Sakha 93)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–706 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amendments affected plant characters more than nitrogen levels did.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L., Sakha 93)Triticum aestivume1
Treatment
concerned amendmentse0
Outcome
plant characterse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
N-levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of the concerned amendments on ECe, SAR values, plant characters, NUE and WP was higher than those of N-levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1402 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L., Sakha 93)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–706 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amendments affected nitrogen use efficiency and water productivity more than nitrogen levels did.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L., Sakha 93)Triticum aestivume1
Treatment
concerned amendmentse0
Outcome
NUE and WPe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
N-levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of the concerned amendments on ECe, SAR values, plant characters, NUE and WP was higher than those of N-levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1402 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L., Sakha 93)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–706 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphuric acid increased wheat grain yield relative to unamended and gypsum treatments.

Treatment
sulphuric acid applicatione0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
about 56%e0
Comparator
un-amended and gypsum treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sulphuric acid application resulted in an increase of wheat grain yield, NUE & WP, by about 56% and 25 %, respectively as compared to un-amended and gypsum treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1579 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphuric acid increased nitrogen use efficiency relative to unamended and gypsum treatments.

Treatment
sulphuric acid applicatione0
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
25 %e0
Comparator
un-amended and gypsum treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sulphuric acid application resulted in an increase of wheat grain yield, NUE & WP, by about 56% and 25 %, respectively as compared to un-amended and gypsum treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1579 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphuric acid increased water productivity relative to unamended and gypsum treatments.

Treatment
sulphuric acid applicatione0
Outcome
WPe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
25 %e0
Comparator
un-amended and gypsum treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sulphuric acid application resulted in an increase of wheat grain yield, NUE & WP, by about 56% and 25 %, respectively as compared to un-amended and gypsum treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1579 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 110 kg N/fed plus sulphuric acid treatment had the highest plant parameter and grain yield values.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L., Sakha 93)Triticum aestivume1
Treatment
110 kg N/fed + SA applicationse0
Outcome
plant parameters, grain yield productione0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest values of plant parameters, grain yield production, WP and the lowest values of soil salinity/sodicity parameters were recorded with the 110 kg N/fed + SA applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1693–1872 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L., Sakha 93)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–706 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 110 kg N/fed plus sulphuric acid treatment had the highest water productivity.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L., Sakha 93)Triticum aestivume1
Treatment
110 kg N/fed + SA applicationse0
Outcome
WPe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest values of plant parameters, grain yield production, WP and the lowest values of soil salinity/sodicity parameters were recorded with the 110 kg N/fed + SA applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1693–1872 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L., Sakha 93)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–706 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 110 kg N/fed plus sulphuric acid treatment had the lowest soil salinity and sodicity.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L., Sakha 93)Triticum aestivume1
Treatment
110 kg N/fed + SA applicationse0
Outcome
soil salinity/sodicity parameterse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest values of plant parameters, grain yield production, WP and the lowest values of soil salinity/sodicity parameters were recorded with the 110 kg N/fed + SA applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1693–1872 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L., Sakha 93)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–706 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 70 kg N/fed plus sulphuric acid treatment had the highest nitrogen use efficiency.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L., Sakha 93)Triticum aestivume1
Treatment
70 kg N/fed and SA applicationse0
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest value of NUE was obtained with the combined effect of 70 kg N/fed and SA applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1881–1978 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L., Sakha 93)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–706 · show in text ↑

sulfuric acid · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

salicylic acid · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

85 papers: 81 positive, 4 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

sulfuric acid · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

salicylic acid · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

23 papers: 23 positive, 0 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

174 papers: 127 positive, 47 negative or no effect

126 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

170 papers more in this group

See all 174 papers →

nitrogen · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 38 positive, 11 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

101 papers: 88 positive, 13 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

97 papers more in this group

See all 101 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.