Paper · 1995 · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

N application enhances remobilization and reduces losses of pre-anthesis N in wheat grown on a duplex soil

JA Palta; IRP Fillery

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
86
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of fertilizer N on the remobilization of N to the grain in wheat was evaluated on a duplex soil at East Beverley, Western Australia. Remobilization of N to the grain was determined using the stable isotope, 15N , which was fed to wheat plants during the vegetative growth phase. Nitrogen was applied at 15, 30 and 60 kg N ha-1 with half being applied at seeding and the remainder at 35 days after sowing (DAS), before the onset of tillering. The high N treatment increased N uptake between stem elongation and anthesis and grain protein concentration by 2.9% relative to the low N treatment. Both the nitrogen harvest index (NHI) and the nitrogen utilization efficiency (NUE) declined as the rate of N application was increased; the decline was more pronounced when the rate of N application was increased from 30 to 60 kg N ha-1. Total grain N at 60 kg N ha-1 was increased by 54%, relative to that at 15 kg N ha-1, due to a 2.3 fold increase in remobilization of pre-anthesis accumulated N and despite a 5 fold reduction in post-anthesis uptake. The application of 60 kg N ha-1 reduced the losses of pre-anthesis N from 19% to 6%. The absolute contribution of the N taken up early in the growth of the crop (before the second node stage) to grain N was 0.9, 1.4 and 3.2 g m-2 at 15, 30 and 60 kg N ha-1 respectively. The contribution of pre-anthesis N to the grain was 2.2, 3.7 and 5.1 g m-2 when 15, 30 and 60 kg N ha-' were applied respectively. This contribution accounted for 60, 82 and 95% of the total grain N respectively. Results indicated that with greater amounts of N accumulated before anthesis, there was higher remobilization to the grain and less risk of net N losses at maturity, because post-anthesis water deficits developed more rapidly.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High N increased uptake between stem elongation and anthesis.

Treatment
high N treatmente0
Outcome
N uptake between stem elongation and anthesise0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
low N treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The high N treatment increased N uptake between stem elongation and anthesis and grain protein concentration by 2.9% relative to the low N treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–601 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High N raised grain protein concentration by 2.9% relative to low N.

Treatment
high N treatmente0
Outcome
grain protein concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.9%e0
Comparator
low N treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The high N treatment increased N uptake between stem elongation and anthesis and grain protein concentration by 2.9% relative to the low N treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–601 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen harvest index declined as N application rate increased.

Treatment
rate of N application was increasede0
Outcome
nitrogen harvest index (NHI)e0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both the nitrogen harvest index (NHI) and the nitrogen utilization efficiency (NUE) declined as the rate of N application was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–738 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen utilization efficiency declined as N application rate increased.

Treatment
rate of N application was increasede0
Outcome
nitrogen utilization efficiency (NUE)e0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both the nitrogen harvest index (NHI) and the nitrogen utilization efficiency (NUE) declined as the rate of N application was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–738 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total grain N at 60 kg N ha-1 rose 54% relative to 15 kg N ha-1.

Treatment
60 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
Total grain Ne0
Direction
increasede0
Value
54%e0
Comparator
15 kg N ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total grain N at 60 kg N ha-1 was increased by 54%, relative to that at 15 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–926 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Remobilization of accumulated pre-anthesis N increased 2.3 fold.

Outcome
remobilization of pre-anthesis accumulated Ne0
Direction
increasee0
Value
2.3 folde0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“due to a 2.3 fold increase in remobilization of pre-anthesis accumulated N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1002 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-anthesis uptake decreased fivefold at the high N rate.

Outcome
post-anthesis uptakee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
5 folde0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“despite a 5 fold reduction in post-anthesis uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1057 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 60 kg N ha-1 reduced pre-anthesis N losses from 19% to 6%.

Treatment
60 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
losses of pre-anthesis Ne0
Direction
reducede0
Value
6%e0
Qualifier
19%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 60 kg N ha-1 reduced the losses of pre-anthesis N from 19% to 6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1142 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early N uptake contributed 0.9, 1.4 and 3.2 g m-2 to grain N at 15, 30 and 60 kg N ha-1.

Outcome
absolute contribution of the N taken up early in the growth of the crop (before the second node stage) to grain Ne0
Value
0.9, 1.4 and 3.2 g m-2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The absolute contribution of the N taken up early in the growth of the crop (before the second node stage) to grain N was 0.9, 1.4 and 3.2 g m-2 at 15, 30 and 60 kg N ha-1 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1328 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-anthesis N contributed 2.2, 3.7 and 5.1 g m-2 to grain at increasing N rates.

Outcome
contribution of pre-anthesis N to the graine0
Value
2.2, 3.7 and 5.1 g m-2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The contribution of pre-anthesis N to the grain was 2.2, 3.7 and 5.1 g m-2 when 15, 30 and 60 kg N ha-' were applied respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1459 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pre-anthesis contribution accounted for 60, 82 and 95% of grain N at increasing rates.

Outcome
total grain Ne0
Value
60, 82 and 95%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This contribution accounted for 60, 82 and 95% of the total grain N respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1461–1541 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater pre-anthesis N accumulation was associated with higher grain remobilization.

Treatment
greater amounts of N accumulated before anthesise0
Outcome
remobilization to the graine0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with greater amounts of N accumulated before anthesis, there was higher remobilization to the grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1566–1665 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater pre-anthesis N accumulation was associated with less net N loss risk at maturity.

Treatment
greater amounts of N accumulated before anthesise0
Outcome
risk of net N losses at maturitye0
Direction
lesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with greater amounts of N accumulated before anthesis, there was higher remobilization to the grain and less risk of net N losses at maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1566–1707 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

174 papers: 127 positive, 47 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

170 papers more in this group

See all 174 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

454 papers: 400 positive, 54 negative or no effect

399 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

450 papers more in this group

See all 454 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

551 papers: 426 positive, 125 negative or no effect

425 papers in the same direction as this paper · 116 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

547 papers more in this group

See all 551 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

323 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,737 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.