Paper · 2018 · Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering

Effect of Gypsum, Sulfuric Acid, Nano-Zeolite Application on Saline-Sodic Soil Properties and Wheat Productivity under Different Tillage Types

A. Kheir; M. Shabana; M. Seleiman

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Soil degradation due to soil salinity and sodicity is considered a serious concern in arid and semiarid ecosystems. Due to arid climate even, normal soils are converted to saline-sodic soils. Recently, reduced tillage proved successfully increasing soil organic matter contributing to soil carbon sequestration leading to improvements in soil physical and chemical properties. However, exploring effect of reduced tillage in saline sodic soils, even under amendments application has less attention so far. Therefore, the present study was conducted to investigate the combined effects of inorganic soil amendments (Nano zeolite, sulphuric acid and gypsum) and tillage systems (reduced and deep tillage) on saline-sodic soil physical and chemical properties and wheat productivity. Deep tillage with sulphuric acid application significantly reduced soil electrical conductivity (EC), exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP), penetration resistance (PR) and bulk density (Bd) and increased soil hydraulic conductivity (HC), mean weight diameter (MWD) and aggregation index (AI) compared to control. Deep tillage showed a significant improvement of saline-sodic soils, despite increasing SOC with reduced tillage. Moreover, sulphuric acid, gypsum and Nano-zeolite applications with deep tillage increased wheat grain yield significantly compared to control. Nano-zeolite application gave the superiority in increasing soil organic carbon compared with sulphuric and gypsum, enhancing wheat productivity to be close to yield under gypsum application without significant differences. Nevertheless, application of Nano-zeolite in improving saline sodic soils not preferable economically compared with sulphuric acid and gypsum. In conclusion, sulphuric acid, gypsum applications in combination with deep tillage improved physical and chemical properties of saline-sodic soils, and consequently enhanced growth and yield of wheat, confirming the importance of deep tillage in reclaiming saline-sodic soils compared with reduced tillage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage with sulphuric acid reduced soil EC, ESP and physical resistance measures relative to control.

Treatment
Deep tillage with sulphuric acid applicatione0
Outcome
soil electrical conductivity (EC), exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP), penetration resistance (PR) and bulk density (Bd)e0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deep tillage with sulphuric acid application significantly reduced soil electrical conductivity (EC), exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP), penetration resistance (PR) and bulk density (Bd) and increased soil hydraulic conductivity (HC), mean weight diameter (MWD) and aggregation index (AI) compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Gypsum, Sulfuric Acid, Nano-Zeolite Application on Saline-Sodic Soil Properties and Wheat Productivity under Different Tillage Types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage with sulphuric acid increased soil hydraulic conductivity and aggregation measures relative to control.

Treatment
Deep tillage with sulphuric acid applicatione0
Outcome
soil hydraulic conductivity (HC), mean weight diameter (MWD) and aggregation index (AI)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deep tillage with sulphuric acid application significantly reduced soil electrical conductivity (EC), exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP), penetration resistance (PR) and bulk density (Bd) and increased soil hydraulic conductivity (HC), mean weight diameter (MWD) and aggregation index (AI) compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Gypsum, Sulfuric Acid, Nano-Zeolite Application on Saline-Sodic Soil Properties and Wheat Productivity under Different Tillage Types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced tillage increased soil organic carbon.

Treatment
reduced tillagee0
Outcome
SOCe0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“despite increasing SOC with reduced tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1206 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Gypsum, Sulfuric Acid, Nano-Zeolite Application on Saline-Sodic Soil Properties and Wheat Productivity under Different Tillage Types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphuric acid with deep tillage significantly increased wheat grain yield relative to control.

Treatment
sulphuric acide0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sulphuric acid, gypsum and Nano-zeolite applications with deep tillage increased wheat grain yield significantly compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1350 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Gypsum, Sulfuric Acid, Nano-Zeolite Application on Saline-Sodic Soil Properties and Wheat Productivity under Different Tillage Types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum with deep tillage significantly increased wheat grain yield relative to control.

Treatment
gypsume0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sulphuric acid, gypsum and Nano-zeolite applications with deep tillage increased wheat grain yield significantly compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1350 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Gypsum, Sulfuric Acid, Nano-Zeolite Application on Saline-Sodic Soil Properties and Wheat Productivity under Different Tillage Types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano-zeolite with deep tillage significantly increased wheat grain yield relative to control.

Treatment
Nano-zeolitee0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sulphuric acid, gypsum and Nano-zeolite applications with deep tillage increased wheat grain yield significantly compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1350 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Gypsum, Sulfuric Acid, Nano-Zeolite Application on Saline-Sodic Soil Properties and Wheat Productivity under Different Tillage Types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano-zeolite increased soil organic carbon more than sulphuric acid and gypsum.

Treatment
Nano-zeolite applicatione0
Outcome
soil organic carbone0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
sulphuric and gypsume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nano-zeolite application gave the superiority in increasing soil organic carbon compared with sulphuric and gypsum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1466 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Gypsum, Sulfuric Acid, Nano-Zeolite Application on Saline-Sodic Soil Properties and Wheat Productivity under Different Tillage Types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano-zeolite wheat productivity was close to that under gypsum, without a significant difference.

Treatment
Nano-zeolitee0
Outcome
wheat productivitye0
Direction
close toe0
Comparator
gypsum applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nano-zeolite application gave the superiority in increasing soil organic carbon compared with sulphuric and gypsum, enhancing wheat productivity to be close to yield under gypsum application without significant differences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1574 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Gypsum, Sulfuric Acid, Nano-Zeolite Application on Saline-Sodic Soil Properties and Wheat Productivity under Different Tillage Types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors did not recommend Nano-zeolite for economic reclamation of saline-sodic soils relative to sulphuric acid and gypsum.

Treatment
Nano-zeolitee0
Outcome
not preferable economicallye0
Comparator
sulphuric acid and gypsume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of Nano-zeolite in improving saline sodic soils not preferable economically compared with sulphuric acid and gypsum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1590–1717 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Gypsum, Sulfuric Acid, Nano-Zeolite Application on Saline-Sodic Soil Properties and Wheat Productivity under Different Tillage Types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑

sulfuric acid · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

sulfuric acid · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

tillage · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 50 positive, 6 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

tillage · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

142 papers: 118 positive, 24 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

138 papers more in this group

See all 142 papers →

lime · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

173 papers: 140 positive, 33 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

169 papers more in this group

See all 173 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

260 papers: 242 positive, 18 negative or no effect

241 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

256 papers more in this group

See all 260 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.