Paper · 2016 · Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering

Yellow Maize Crop Response to Potassium and Boron Fertilization under Upper Egypt Conditions.

A. Attia; R. El-Dissoky

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Potassium (K) and boron (B) are essential nutrients for plant growth, yield and quality, for their roles as enzymes activities and for sugars and carbohydrate transport as well as the synergetic relationship between them. In addition, plants that are large consumers of K require B levels greater than 20 ppm in the tissue to accomplish this. Also, to achieve or maintain maximal maize yields, supplemental K and B fertilization is often required, particularly on soils testing low for native available soil K and B. So, two field experiments were carried out during the two successive summer growing seasons of 2015 and 2016 at Kom Ombo Agriculture Research Station, Aswan Governorate (Latitude 24° 47' 21.40" N, Longitude 32° 92' 47.5" E), to evaluate the response of maize crop (Zea maize L. c.v yellow single hybrid 168) to K and B fertilization. Treatments were carried out in a split plot design with three replicates; the main plots were assigned for 6 rates of K fertilizer: K1 (control: without K fertilization), K2 (24 kg K2O fed-1), K3 (36 kg K2O fed-1), K4 (48 kg K2O fed-1), K5 (foliar applied 2% K2O) and K6 (24 kg K2O fed-1+ foliar applied 2% K2O), and the split plots were devoted to three treatments of foliar applied B (B0: without B, B1: 25 mg B L-1 and B2: 50 mg B L-1). Results demonstrated the importance of potassium and boron fertilization for maize crop yield and its quality under the present conditions. Results showed that addition of K fertilizer rates as soil and/or foliar with boron increased maize grain yield, its components and quality. N, P, K and B concentrations and uptake in both stalk and grain were also significantly increased. Yet, interactions among K fertilization rates and foliar applied B significantly increased grain and stalk yields as well as grain contents of carbohydrate and oil. The highest grain and stalk yields (3700 and 5369 kg fed-1, respectively) were recorded by the interaction of K4×B2 without significant differences between it and the yields recorded by the interactions of K3×B2 or K6×B2. N, P, K and B concentrations or uptake in grain and stalk increased with interaction between K and B, but these increases were only significant for K and B. On the other hand, economic evaluation of the studied treatments illustrated that the treatments of K6 (24 kg K2O fed-1+foliar applied 2% K2O) and K3 (36 kg K2O fed-1) with foliar applied 50 mg B L-1 were the most profitable since they achieved the optimum maize grain yield under this study conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined potassium and boron fertilization increased maize grain yield and its components and quality.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
K fertilizer rates as soil and/or foliar with borone0
Outcome
maize grain yield, its components and qualitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“addition of K fertilizer rates as soil and/or foliar with boron increased maize grain yield, its components and quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1571 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fertilization significantly increased N, P, K and B concentrations and uptake in stalk and grain.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Potassium and Boron Fertilizationt0
Outcome
N, P, K and B concentrations and uptake in both stalk and graine0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N, P, K and B concentrations and uptake in both stalk and grain were also significantly increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1670 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Crop Response to Potassium and Boron Fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 7–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium and boron interactions significantly increased grain and stalk yields.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
K fertilization rates and foliar applied Be0
Outcome
grain and stalk yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interactions among K fertilization rates and foliar applied B significantly increased grain and stalk yields as well as grain contents of carbohydrate and oil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1676–1835 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 7–12 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium and boron interactions significantly increased grain carbohydrate and oil content.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
K fertilization rates and foliar applied Be0
Outcome
grain contents of carbohydrate and oile0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interactions among K fertilization rates and foliar applied B significantly increased grain and stalk yields as well as grain contents of carbohydrate and oil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1676–1835 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 7–12 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

K4×B2 gave the highest grain yield, 3700 kg fed-1, with no significant difference from K3×B2 or K6×B2.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
K4×B2e0
Outcome
grain and stalk yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3700 and 5369 kg fed-1e0
Comparator
K3×B2 or K6×B2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain and stalk yields (3700 and 5369 kg fed-1, respectively) were recorded by the interaction of K4×B2 without significant differences between it and the yields recorded by the interactions of K3×B2 or K6×B2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1836–2057 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 7–12 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

K4×B2 gave the highest stalk yield, 5369 kg fed-1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
K4×B2e0
Outcome
stalk yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3700 and 5369 kg fed-1e0
Comparator
K3×B2 or K6×B2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain and stalk yields (3700 and 5369 kg fed-1, respectively) were recorded by the interaction of K4×B2 without significant differences between it and the yields recorded by the interactions of K3×B2 or K6×B2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1836–2057 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 7–12 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

K and B interactions increased N and P concentrations or uptake in grain and stalk without stated significance.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
interaction between K and Be0
Outcome
N, P, K and B concentrations or uptake in grain and stalke0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N, P, K and B concentrations or uptake in grain and stalk increased with interaction between K and B, but these increases were only significant for K and B.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2058–2214 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 7–12 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K6 and K3 with 50 mg B L-1 foliar application were the most profitable treatments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
K6 (24 kg K2O fed-1+foliar applied 2% K2O) and K3 (36 kg K2O fed-1) with foliar applied 50 mg B L-1e0
Outcome
most profitablee0
Direction
most profitablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatments of K6 (24 kg K2O fed-1+foliar applied 2% K2O) and K3 (36 kg K2O fed-1) with foliar applied 50 mg B L-1 were the most profitable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2297–2439 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 7–12 · show in text ↑

boron atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

26 papers: 18 positive, 8 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

boron atom · quality: general · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

85 papers: 71 positive, 14 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

potassium · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

96 papers: 74 positive, 22 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

92 papers more in this group

See all 96 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

application · quality: general · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 23 positive, 6 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 86 positive, 17 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

application · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

629 papers: 575 positive, 54 negative or no effect

574 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

625 papers more in this group

See all 629 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.