Paper · 2022 · Agriculture

Impact of Organic and Chemical Nitrogen Fertilizers on the Crop Yield and Fertilizer Use Efficiency of Soybean–Maize Intercropping Systems

Shifang Lin; Yijun Pi; Dayong Long; et al.

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
30
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The effect of the mixture (1:1) of chemical and organic nitrogen (N) fertilizer on crop yield quality and N fertilizer use efficiency remains elusive. A nitrogen field experiment was conducted in the growing seasons of 2020 and 2021 to investigate the effects of the mixture of chemical and organic N fertilizer on the crop yield, crop quality and nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency in a maize–soybean intercropping system in China. Four treatments applied at 150 kg N ha−1 were used: no nitrogen fertilizer (CK), chemical N fertilizer (ChemF), mixture (1:1) of chemical and organic N fertilizer (ChemF + OrgF) and organic N fertilizer (OrgF). The results showed that the yield and aboveground N accumulation of both soybean and maize increased with the application of fertilizer. The ChemF + OrgF treatment had lower maize and soybean seed yields than for ChemF treatment, but higher than the other two treatments in both years, and the maize yield of the (ChemF + OrgF) treatment was significantly higher (14.9%) in 2021 than 2020. Yields were significantly positively correlated with aboveground N accumulation and fertilizer use efficiency, measured using the nitrogen partial productivity (NPP), nitrogen agronomic efficiency (NAE) and nitrogen fertilizer recovery rate (NFRR). The protein content tended to increase and the oil content tended to decrease under (ChemF + OrgF) applications in soybeans. The (ChemF + OrgF) treatment had the lowest starch content in maize. There was no significant difference in the nitrogen harvest index among treatments, while the NPP, NAE and NFRR were the highest for the application of chemical N fertilizer and significantly decreased with the addition of organic N fertilizer. We conclude that the mixture (1:1) of chemical and organic N fertilizer increased the seed yield and quality of maize, but only the seed yield of soybean.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer increased soybean and maize yields and aboveground nitrogen accumulation.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
application of fertilizere0
Outcome
yield and aboveground N accumulatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the yield and aboveground N accumulation of both soybean and maize increased with the application of fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–780 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mixed fertilizer gave lower soybean and maize seed yields than chemical fertilizer but higher yields than the other treatments.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
ChemF + OrgFe0
Outcome
soybean seed yieldse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
ChemF treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ChemF + OrgF treatment had lower maize and soybean seed yields than for ChemF treatment, but higher than the other two treatments in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–928 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yield under mixed fertilizer was 14.9% higher in 2021 than 2020.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
ChemF + OrgFe0
Outcome
maize yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
14.9%e0
Comparator
2020e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maize yield of the (ChemF + OrgF) treatment was significantly higher (14.9%) in 2021 than 2020”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1032 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yields correlated positively with aboveground nitrogen accumulation and fertilizer use efficiency.

Treatment
fertilizer use efficiencye0
Outcome
Yieldse0
Direction
positively correlatede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Yields were significantly positively correlated with aboveground N accumulation and fertilizer use efficiency, measured using the nitrogen partial productivity (NPP), nitrogen agronomic efficiency (NAE) and nitrogen fertilizer recovery rate (NFRR).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1282 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed fertilizer tended to increase soybean protein content.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe0
Treatment
ChemF + OrgFe0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The protein content tended to increase and the oil content tended to decrease under (ChemF + OrgF) applications in soybeans.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1407 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed fertilizer tended to decrease soybean oil content.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe0
Treatment
ChemF + OrgFe0
Outcome
oil contente0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The protein content tended to increase and the oil content tended to decrease under (ChemF + OrgF) applications in soybeans.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1407 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed fertilizer gave maize the lowest starch content.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
ChemF + OrgFe0
Outcome
starch contente0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The (ChemF + OrgF) treatment had the lowest starch content in maize.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1476 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen harvest index did not differ significantly among treatments.

Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
nitrogen harvest indexe0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant difference in the nitrogen harvest index among treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1559 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPP, NAE and NFRR were highest with chemical fertilizer and decreased with added organic fertilizer.

Treatment
addition of organic N fertilizere0
Outcome
NPP, NAE and NFRRe0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
chemical N fertilizere0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the NPP, NAE and NFRR were the highest for the application of chemical N fertilizer and significantly decreased with the addition of organic N fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1567–1721 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: oil · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

80 papers: 64 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 64 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

76 papers more in this group

See all 80 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

85 papers: 71 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 71 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 116 positive, 18 negative or no effect

115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

fertilization · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

1,192 papers: 1,021 positive, 171 negative or no effect

1,020 papers in the same direction as this paper · 155 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1,188 papers more in this group

See all 1,192 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.