Paper · 1985 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

EFFECTS OF LIQUID HOG MANURE APPLICATION RATES ON SILAGE CORN YIELD AND NUTRIENT UPTAKE

H. ANTOUN; S. A. VISSER; M. P. CESCAS; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The objective of this work was to determine the response of corn to liquid hog manure surface applied at rates of 28, 56 and 112 tonnes/ha. In greenhouse trials, yield of corn grown for 4 wk on St. Jude loamy sand was not affected by manure application. On Kamouraska silty clay, only manure applied at a rate of 112 tonnes/ha increased corn yield, as compared to the non-treated control. Corn response on Janvier sandy clay loam improved with increasing rate of manure application up to 56 tonnes/ha. Application of 112 tonnes/ha (325 kg N/ha) manure increased N content of corn and had a significant residual effect as noted by the high yield obtained at the second harvest. In a 2-yr field experiment on Kamouraska soil, corn yield was significantly higher at 112 tonnes/ha (avg 432 kg N/ha) than chemical fertilizer application at 150 kg N/ha, and manure-treated soil contained more P, Ca and Mg after the first year. Nutrient uptake by corn increased with amount of manure applied. However, corn whole plant composition was not affected by rate of manure application. N recovery was higher from manure at 28 or 56 tonnes/ha than from a chemical fertilizer (150 kg N/ha, 65.5 kg P/ha and 125 kg K/ha). At the rates applied, the liquid hog manure did not result in reduced corn yield.Key words: Corn yield, hog manure, nutrient uptake, silage corn

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure application did not affect corn yield in greenhouse trials on St. Jude loamy sand

Treatment
manure applicatione1
Outcome
yield of corne1
Direction
not affectede1
Setting
greenhouse trialse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The objective of this work was to determine the response of corn to liquid hog manure surface applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“In greenhouse trials, yield of corn grown for 4 wk on St. Jude loamy sand was not affected by manure application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only 112 tonnes/ha of manure increased corn yield on Kamouraska silty clay compared with the non-treated control

Treatment
manure applied at a rate of 112 tonnes/hae2
Outcome
corn yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
non-treated controle2
Setting
Kamouraska silty claye2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The objective of this work was to determine the response of corn to liquid hog manure surface applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e2

“On Kamouraska silty clay, only manure applied at a rate of 112 tonnes/ha increased corn yield, as compared to the non-treated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–387 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn response on Janvier sandy clay loam improved with manure rate up to 56 tonnes/ha

Treatment
increasing rate of manure applicatione3
Outcome
Corn responsee3
Direction
improvede3
Qualifier
up to 56 tonnes/hae3
Setting
Janvier sandy clay loame3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The objective of this work was to determine the response of corn to liquid hog manure surface applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e3

“Corn response on Janvier sandy clay loam improved with increasing rate of manure application up to 56 tonnes/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–500 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

112 tonnes/ha of manure increased corn N content

Treatment
112 tonnes/ha (325 kg N/ha) manuree4
Outcome
N content of corne4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The objective of this work was to determine the response of corn to liquid hog manure surface applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of 112 tonnes/ha (325 kg N/ha) manure increased N content of corn and had a significant residual effect as noted by the high yield obtained at the second harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–675 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

112 tonnes/ha of manure had a significant residual effect shown by high corn yield at the second harvest

Treatment
112 tonnes/ha (325 kg N/ha) manuree4
Outcome
yield obtained at the second harveste4
Direction
highe4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The objective of this work was to determine the response of corn to liquid hog manure surface applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of 112 tonnes/ha (325 kg N/ha) manure increased N content of corn and had a significant residual effect as noted by the high yield obtained at the second harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–675 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In a 2-year field trial on Kamouraska soil, 112 tonnes/ha of manure gave significantly higher corn yield than chemical fertilizer at 150 kg N/ha

Treatment
112 tonnes/hae5
Outcome
corn yielde5
Direction
highere5
Qualifier
avg 432 kg N/hae5
Comparator
chemical fertilizer application at 150 kg N/hae5
Setting
2-yr field experiment on Kamouraska soile5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The objective of this work was to determine the response of corn to liquid hog manure surface applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e5

“In a 2-yr field experiment on Kamouraska soil, corn yield was significantly higher at 112 tonnes/ha (avg 432 kg N/ha) than chemical fertilizer application at 150 kg N/ha, and manure-treated soil contained more P, Ca and Mg after the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–920 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure-treated soil contained more P, Ca and Mg after the first year

Treatment
manuree5
Outcome
P, Ca and Mge5
Direction
moree5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The objective of this work was to determine the response of corn to liquid hog manure surface applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e5

“In a 2-yr field experiment on Kamouraska soil, corn yield was significantly higher at 112 tonnes/ha (avg 432 kg N/ha) than chemical fertilizer application at 150 kg N/ha, and manure-treated soil contained more P, Ca and Mg after the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–920 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient uptake by corn increased with the amount of manure applied

Treatment
amount of manure appliede6
Outcome
Nutrient uptakee6
Direction
increasede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The objective of this work was to determine the response of corn to liquid hog manure surface applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e6

“Nutrient uptake by corn increased with amount of manure applied. However, corn whole plant composition was not affected by rate of manure application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1071 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rate of manure application did not change the whole plant composition of corn

Treatment
rate of manure applicatione6
Outcome
corn whole plant compositione6
Direction
not affectede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The objective of this work was to determine the response of corn to liquid hog manure surface applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e6

“Nutrient uptake by corn increased with amount of manure applied. However, corn whole plant composition was not affected by rate of manure application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1071 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N recovery was higher from manure at 28 or 56 tonnes/ha than from chemical fertilizer

Treatment
manure at 28 or 56 tonnes/hae7
Outcome
N recoverye7
Direction
highere7
Comparator
a chemical fertilizer (150 kg N/ha, 65.5 kg P/ha and 125 kg K/ha)e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The objective of this work was to determine the response of corn to liquid hog manure surface applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e7

“N recovery was higher from manure at 28 or 56 tonnes/ha than from a chemical fertilizer (150 kg N/ha, 65.5 kg P/ha and 125 kg K/ha). At the rates applied, the liquid hog manure did not result in reduced corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the rates applied, liquid hog manure did not reduce corn yield

Treatment
liquid hog manuree7
Outcome
corn yielde7
Direction
did not result in reducede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The objective of this work was to determine the response of corn to liquid hog manure surface applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e7

“N recovery was higher from manure at 28 or 56 tonnes/ha than from a chemical fertilizer (150 kg N/ha, 65.5 kg P/ha and 125 kg K/ha). At the rates applied, the liquid hog manure did not result in reduced corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1286 · show in text ↑

fertilization · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

162 papers: 137 positive, 25 negative or no effect

136 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

158 papers more in this group

See all 162 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 86 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

489 papers: 403 positive, 86 negative or no effect

402 papers in the same direction as this paper · 83 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

485 papers more in this group

See all 489 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

1,025 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

1,160 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.