Paper · 1986 · Journal of Environmental Quality

Comparison of Solid vs. Liquid Dairy Manure Applications on Corn Yield and Soil Composition

A. L. Sutton; D. W. Nelson; D. T. Kelly; et al.

17
claims
18
verbatim quotes
48
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract A 6‐yr field experiment was conducted to determine the effects of liquid and solid dairy ( Bos taurus ) manure applications on a Crosby silt loam (Aerie Ochraqualfs) soil cropped to corn ( Zea mays L.). Liquid manure at rates of 112, 224, and 336 Mg ha −1 and solid manure at rates of 34, 67, and 101 Mg ha −1 were spread annually for 5 yr. No manure was applied the 6th yr, but the soil was cropped to determine residual nutrient effects. Check and inorganic fertilizer treatments were also included in the study. Manure addition increased corn yields when compared to the check (no fertilizer). There were variable weather conditions and nutrient concentrations of the manure sources, and the manure application rates were relatively high. Corn yields were as great or greater from plots supplied with manure and manure slurries as those supplied with commercial fertilizer. Over the 5 yr of manure application, the 224 Mg ha −1 rate of liquid manure and the 67 Mg ha − rate of solid manure results in maximum corn yields that were 1% higher than commercial fertilizer. Accumulations of nutrients in the soil from high liquid manure application rates (224 and 336 Mg ha −1 ) increased corn yields during the residual cropping year. Corn leaf N and P concentrations tended to reflect N and P rates applied with the manures and the fertilizer treatment compared to the check, but not consistently each year. Source of manure had little affect on corn leaf composition. Soil P, K, and Na increased with each additional year of manure application and tended to increase with higher application rates. Extractable P accumulated in the upper profile of soil, whereas exchangeable K and Na increased at lower depths in the soil profile, especially with the highest manure application rates. Based on this study, both solid and liquid dairy manures are valuable sources of nutrients for corn production; however, they are less efficient than commercial fertilizers when comparing equivalent nutrient levels and when they are applied to the soil surface. Excessive application of either manure source causes potential for considerable groundwater pollution.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure addition increased corn yield versus no fertilizer.

Treatment
Manure additione0
Outcome
corn yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the check (no fertilizer)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Manure addition increased corn yields when compared to the check (no fertilizer).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–605 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure supplied plots yielded as much or more than commercial fertilizer plots.

Treatment
manure and manure slurriese0
Outcome
Corn yieldse0
Direction
as great or greatere0
Comparator
commercial fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn yields were as great or greater from plots supplied with manure and manure slurries as those supplied with commercial fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liquid manure at 224 Mg ha −1 produced maximum yield 1% above commercial fertilizer.

Treatment
224 Mg ha −1 rate of liquid manuree0
Outcome
corn yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
1%e0
Comparator
commercial fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 224 Mg ha −1 rate of liquid manure and the 67 Mg ha − rate of solid manure results in maximum corn yields that were 1% higher than commercial fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solid manure at 67 Mg ha − produced maximum yield 1% above commercial fertilizer.

Treatment
67 Mg ha − rate of solid manuree0
Outcome
corn yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
1%e0
Comparator
commercial fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 224 Mg ha −1 rate of liquid manure and the 67 Mg ha − rate of solid manure results in maximum corn yields that were 1% higher than commercial fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient accumulation after high liquid manure rates increased residual year corn yield.

Treatment
high liquid manure application rates (224 and 336 Mg ha −1 )e0
Outcome
corn yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
residual cropping yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Accumulations of nutrients in the soil from high liquid manure application rates (224 and 336 Mg ha −1 ) increased corn yields during the residual cropping year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1242 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn leaf N concentration tended to reflect manure and fertilizer N rates, inconsistently across years.

Treatment
N and P rates applied with the manures and the fertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
Corn leaf Ne0
Qualifier
not consistently each yeare0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn leaf N and P concentrations tended to reflect N and P rates applied with the manures and the fertilizer treatment compared to the check, but not consistently each year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1416 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn leaf P concentration tended to reflect manure and fertilizer P rates, inconsistently across years.

Treatment
N and P rates applied with the manures and the fertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
P concentrationse0
Qualifier
not consistently each yeare0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn leaf N and P concentrations tended to reflect N and P rates applied with the manures and the fertilizer treatment compared to the check, but not consistently each year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1416 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure source had little effect on corn leaf composition.

Treatment
Source of manuree0
Outcome
corn leaf compositione0
Direction
little affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Source of manure had little affect on corn leaf composition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1417–1477 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil P increased with successive manure application years and higher rates.

Treatment
manure applicatione0
Outcome
Soil Pe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Soil P, K, and Na increased with each additional year of manure application and tended to increase with higher application rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1607 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil K increased with successive manure application years and higher rates.

Treatment
manure applicatione0
Outcome
Ke0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Soil P, K, and Na increased with each additional year of manure application and tended to increase with higher application rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1607 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil Na increased with successive manure application years and higher rates.

Treatment
manure applicatione0
Outcome
Nae0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Soil P, K, and Na increased with each additional year of manure application and tended to increase with higher application rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1607 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extractable P accumulated in the upper soil profile.

Outcome
Extractable Pe0
Direction
accumulatede0
Setting
upper profile of soile0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Extractable P accumulated in the upper profile of soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1608–1662 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exchangeable K increased at lower soil depths, especially at highest manure rates.

Outcome
exchangeable Ke0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
highest manure application ratese0
Setting
lower depths in the soil profilee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“exchangeable K and Na increased at lower depths in the soil profile, especially with the highest manure application rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1793 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exchangeable Na increased at lower soil depths, especially at highest manure rates.

Outcome
Nae0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
highest manure application ratese0
Setting
lower depths in the soil profilee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“exchangeable K and Na increased at lower depths in the soil profile, especially with the highest manure application rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1793 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Both manure sources were judged valuable for corn nutrient supply.

Outcome
solid and liquid dairy manures are valuable sources of nutrients for corn productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both solid and liquid dairy manures are valuable sources of nutrients for corn production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1816–1905 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manures were less nutrient efficient than commercial fertilizer when surface applied.

Outcome
less efficiente0
Direction
less efficiente0
Qualifier
when comparing equivalent nutrient levels and when they are applied to the soil surfacee0
Comparator
commercial fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“they are less efficient than commercial fertilizers when comparing equivalent nutrient levels and when they are applied to the soil surface.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1916–2056 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–70 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excessive manure application presents potential groundwater pollution.

Treatment
Excessive application of either manure sourcee0
Outcome
potential for considerable groundwater pollutione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Excessive application of either manure source causes potential for considerable groundwater pollution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2057–2159 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: general · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 86 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.