Paper · 2017 · Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering

Roles of Planting Methods, Irrigation Techniques and Weed Control Treatments in Wheat Crop Performance, Associated Weeds and Water Productivity

M. Badawi; M. Kenapar

19
claims
41
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field trial was executed at Gemmeiza during 2014/2015 and 2015/2016 winter seasons. The experiment aiming at finding the response of wheat crop and the associated weeds to planting methods vis Raised Bed Broadcasting (RBB), Flat in Rows (FR) and Flat Broadcasting (FB), irrigation techniques (irrigating as 40, 60 and 80% of available soil moisture were depleted) and weeding treatments (Pallas, Atlantis, Brominal w + Topik, Hand weeding and Un-weeded (Control) as well as their interactions. The crop-water relationships e.g. water use and water productivity were considered. The adopted treatments were assessed in split–split plot experimental design with 3 replicates, where planting methods, irrigation techniques and weed control treatments were represented in main, split and split-split plots, respectively. The main findings were as follows:1- Raised Bed Broadcasting (RBB), comparable with FR or FB ones, resulted in reduced fresh weight values of grassy, broad-leaved and total annual weeds, and on the other side, enhanced tillers No. plant-1, plant height, 1000-grain weight, straw and grain yields. In addition, lower Water consumptive use values were detected with RBB, and averaged 14.71 and 18.22% over the two seasons, respectively, lesser than those with FR and FB. Water Productivity under RBB were increased, and averaged 42.73 and 31.95% over the two seasons, respectively, comparable with FR and FB techniques. 2- Irrigating at 80% ASMD regime exhibited lower values of grassy, broad-leaved and total annual weeds fresh weight, comparing with 40 and 60% ASMD regimes. Higher tillers No. plant-1 values were recorded for 40%ASMD, whereas plant height, 1000-grain weight, straw and grain yields exhibited higher values under 60% ASMD. Cu under 80% ASMD, as two season averages, were10.38 and 5.42%, respectively, lower than those with 40 and 60% ASMD, and higher WP was attained, and averaged 22.46 and 23.60% over the two seasons, respectively, more than those with 40 and 60% ASMD techniques.3- Brominal w+ Topik application, comparable with the other tested weeding treatments, exhibited desired trends for the parameters under study, where fresh weight of grassy, broad–leaved and annual total weeds and Cu were reduced. Additionally, higher values of plant height, 1000-grain weight, grain and straw yields as well as WP were recorded with Brominal w +Topik application. The bilateral interaction of planting method (RBB) and irrigation regime (80% ASMD) resulted in the lowest fresh weight values of grassy and Broad- leaved weeds and total. Furthermore, significant higher values of plant height, 1000-grain weight in the two seasons and grain yield in 1st season were recorded. The interaction between 80 % ASMD irrigation technique and Brominal w + Topik application resulted in, on two seasons mean basis, lower values of fresh weight for grassy and broad-leaved and total weeds. In addition, except tillers No. plant-1 trait, higher values of plant height, 1000-grain weight, straw and grain yields (19.86 ardab fed-1) were obtained. The interaction between RBB and Brominal w + Topik application exhibited lower values of fresh weight for grassy, broad-leaved weeds and total. Furthermore, except tillers No. plant-1 trait, higher values of plant height, 1000-grain weight, straw and grain yields were recorded. In the present investigation, the tertiary interaction of RBB, 80% ASMD and Brominal w + Topik application exhibited desired figures of Cu and WP for wheat crop. Due to the attained results, it could be advisable to plant wheat on raised beds and irrigating as 80% of available soil moisture was depleted besides Brominal w + Topik application in order to annual associated weeds control and to obtain acceptable water use and water productivity figures.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised bed broadcasting reduced annual weed fresh weight relative to flat methods.

Treatment
Raised Bed Broadcasting (RBB)e0
Outcome
fresh weight values of grassy, broad-leaved and total annual weedse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
FR or FBe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Crop Performance, Associated Weeds and Water Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–143 · show in text ↑
e0

“Raised Bed Broadcasting (RBB), comparable with FR or FB ones, resulted in reduced fresh weight values of grassy, broad-leaved and total annual weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–1004 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised bed broadcasting increased wheat tillers, height, thousand grain weight and yields.

Treatment
Raised Bed Broadcasting (RBB)e1
Outcome
tillers No. plant-1, plant height, 1000-grain weight, straw and grain yieldse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enhanced tillers No. plant-1, plant height, 1000-grain weight, straw and grain yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1114 · show in text ↑
t0

“Roles of Planting Methods, Irrigation Techniques and Weed Control Treatments in Wheat Crop Performance, Associated Weeds and Water Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“Raised Bed Broadcasting (RBB), comparable with FR or FB ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–916 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised bed broadcasting reduced water consumptive use by 14.71% and 18.22% relative to FR and FB.

Treatment
RBBe0
Outcome
Water consumptive usee0
Direction
lowere0
Value
14.71 and 18.22%e0
Comparator
FR and FBe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lower Water consumptive use values were detected with RBB, and averaged 14.71 and 18.22% over the two seasons, respectively, lesser than those with FR and FB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1286 · show in text ↑
t0

“Roles of Planting Methods, Irrigation Techniques and Weed Control Treatments in Wheat Crop Performance, Associated Weeds and Water Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised bed broadcasting raised water productivity relative to FR and FB by 42.73% and 31.95%.

Treatment
RBBe0
Outcome
Water Productivitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
42.73 and 31.95%e0
Comparator
FR and FBe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water Productivity under RBB were increased, and averaged 42.73 and 31.95% over the two seasons, respectively, comparable with FR and FB techniques”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1435 · show in text ↑
t0

“Roles of Planting Methods, Irrigation Techniques and Weed Control Treatments in Wheat Crop Performance, Associated Weeds and Water Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 80% ASMD lowered weed fresh weight relative to 40% and 60%.

Treatment
80% ASMDe0
Outcome
grassy, broad-leaved and total annual weeds fresh weighte0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
40 and 60% ASMD regimese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigating at 80% ASMD regime exhibited lower values of grassy, broad-leaved and total annual weeds fresh weight, comparing with 40 and 60% ASMD regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1440–1592 · show in text ↑
t0

“Roles of Planting Methods, Irrigation Techniques and Weed Control Treatments in Wheat Crop Performance, Associated Weeds and Water Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 40% ASMD produced higher tiller numbers.

Treatment
40%ASMDe0
Outcome
tillers No. plant-1e0
Direction
Highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher tillers No. plant-1 values were recorded for 40%ASMD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1653 · show in text ↑
t0

“Roles of Planting Methods, Irrigation Techniques and Weed Control Treatments in Wheat Crop Performance, Associated Weeds and Water Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 60% ASMD produced higher height, grain weight, straw and grain yield.

Treatment
60% ASMDe0
Outcome
plant height, 1000-grain weight, straw and grain yieldse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height, 1000-grain weight, straw and grain yields exhibited higher values under 60% ASMD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1663–1757 · show in text ↑
t0

“Roles of Planting Methods, Irrigation Techniques and Weed Control Treatments in Wheat Crop Performance, Associated Weeds and Water Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 80% ASMD lowered consumptive use by 10.38% and 5.42% relative to 40% and 60%.

Treatment
80% ASMDe0
Outcome
Cue0
Direction
lowere0
Value
10.38 and 5.42%e0
Comparator
40 and 60% ASMDe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cu under 80% ASMD, as two season averages, were10.38 and 5.42%, respectively, lower than those with 40 and 60% ASMD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1759–1874 · show in text ↑
t0

“Roles of Planting Methods, Irrigation Techniques and Weed Control Treatments in Wheat Crop Performance, Associated Weeds and Water Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 80% ASMD raised water productivity by 22.46% and 23.60%.

Treatment
80% ASMDe1
Outcome
WPe0
Direction
highere0
Value
22.46 and 23.60%e0
Comparator
40 and 60% ASMDe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher WP was attained, and averaged 22.46 and 23.60% over the two seasons, respectively, more than those with 40 and 60% ASMD techniques”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1880–2017 · show in text ↑
t0

“Roles of Planting Methods, Irrigation Techniques and Weed Control Treatments in Wheat Crop Performance, Associated Weeds and Water Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cu under 80% ASMD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1759–1776 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brominal w + Topik reduced weed fresh weight and water use.

Treatment
Brominal w+ Topike0
Outcome
fresh weight of grassy, broad–leaved and annual total weeds and Cue0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
other tested weeding treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brominal w+ Topik application, comparable with the other tested weeding treatments, exhibited desired trends for the parameters under study, where fresh weight of grassy, broad–leaved and annual total weeds and Cu were reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2021–2247 · show in text ↑
t0

“Roles of Planting Methods, Irrigation Techniques and Weed Control Treatments in Wheat Crop Performance, Associated Weeds and Water Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brominal w + Topik raised wheat height, grain weight, yields and water productivity.

Treatment
Brominal w +Topike0
Outcome
plant height, 1000-grain weight, grain and straw yields as well as WPe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher values of plant height, 1000-grain weight, grain and straw yields as well as WP were recorded with Brominal w +Topik application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2263–2398 · show in text ↑
t0

“Roles of Planting Methods, Irrigation Techniques and Weed Control Treatments in Wheat Crop Performance, Associated Weeds and Water Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RBB with 80% ASMD produced the lowest weed fresh weights.

Treatment
RBB) and irrigation regime (80% ASMDe0
Outcome
fresh weight values of grassy and Broad- leaved weeds and totale0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The bilateral interaction of planting method (RBB) and irrigation regime (80% ASMD) resulted in the lowest fresh weight values of grassy and Broad- leaved weeds and total”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2400–2570 · show in text ↑
t0

“Roles of Planting Methods, Irrigation Techniques and Weed Control Treatments in Wheat Crop Performance, Associated Weeds and Water Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RBB with 80% ASMD increased height and grain weight in both seasons and grain yield in the first.

Treatment
RBBe1
Outcome
plant height, 1000-grain weight in the two seasons and grain yield in 1st seasone0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant higher values of plant height, 1000-grain weight in the two seasons and grain yield in 1st season were recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2585–2708 · show in text ↑
t0

“Roles of Planting Methods, Irrigation Techniques and Weed Control Treatments in Wheat Crop Performance, Associated Weeds and Water Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“planting method (RBB) and irrigation regime (80% ASMD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2429–2483 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

80% ASMD with Brominal w + Topik reduced weed fresh weights.

Treatment
80 % ASMD irrigation technique and Brominal w + Topik applicatione0
Outcome
fresh weight for grassy and broad-leaved and total weedse0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction between 80 % ASMD irrigation technique and Brominal w + Topik application resulted in, on two seasons mean basis, lower values of fresh weight for grassy and broad-leaved and total weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2710–2912 · show in text ↑
t0

“Roles of Planting Methods, Irrigation Techniques and Weed Control Treatments in Wheat Crop Performance, Associated Weeds and Water Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

80% ASMD with Brominal w + Topik increased height, grain weight, straw and grain yields.

Treatment
80 % ASMD irrigation technique and Brominal w + Topik applicatione1
Outcome
plant height, 1000-grain weight, straw and grain yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
19.86 ardab fed-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher values of plant height, 1000-grain weight, straw and grain yields (19.86 ardab fed-1) were obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2961–3067 · show in text ↑
t0

“Roles of Planting Methods, Irrigation Techniques and Weed Control Treatments in Wheat Crop Performance, Associated Weeds and Water Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“80 % ASMD irrigation technique and Brominal w + Topik application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2734–2799 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RBB with Brominal w + Topik lowered weed fresh weights.

Treatment
RBB and Brominal w + Topik applicatione0
Outcome
fresh weight for grassy, broad-leaved weeds and totale0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction between RBB and Brominal w + Topik application exhibited lower values of fresh weight for grassy, broad-leaved weeds and total”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3069–3211 · show in text ↑
t0

“Roles of Planting Methods, Irrigation Techniques and Weed Control Treatments in Wheat Crop Performance, Associated Weeds and Water Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RBB with Brominal w + Topik raised height, grain weight and yields.

Treatment
RBB and Brominal w + Topik applicatione1
Outcome
plant height, 1000-grain weight, straw and grain yieldse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher values of plant height, 1000-grain weight, straw and grain yields were recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3260–3346 · show in text ↑
t0

“Roles of Planting Methods, Irrigation Techniques and Weed Control Treatments in Wheat Crop Performance, Associated Weeds and Water Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“RBB and Brominal w + Topik application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3093–3131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three-way treatment produced desired consumptive water use and water productivity figures.

Treatment
RBB, 80% ASMD and Brominal w + Topik applicatione0
Outcome
desired figures of Cu and WPe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the tertiary interaction of RBB, 80% ASMD and Brominal w + Topik application exhibited desired figures of Cu and WP for wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3378–3508 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advise raised beds, 80% ASMD irrigation and Brominal w + Topik to control weeds and manage water productivity.

Outcome
plant wheat on raised beds and irrigating as 80% of available soil moisture was depleted besides Brominal w + Topik applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it could be advisable to plant wheat on raised beds and irrigating as 80% of available soil moisture was depleted besides Brominal w + Topik application in order to annual associated weeds control and to obtain acceptable water use and water productivity figures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3539–3801 · show in text ↑

tillage · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

117 papers: 97 positive, 20 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

113 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

tillage · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

183 papers: 126 positive, 57 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

179 papers more in this group

See all 183 papers →

transplanting · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 10 positive, 6 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

transplanting · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 13 positive, 8 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

irrigation · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 15 positive, 8 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

tillage · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 119 positive, 26 negative or no effect

118 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

transplanting · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 129 positive, 47 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

172 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.