Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Effect of weed-control practice and irrigation levels on weeds and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum)

MUHAMMAD ATHER NADEEM; ASlF TANVEER; ASGHAR ALI; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to study the effect of different weed-control practices and irrigation levels on weeds and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.) in winter 2002-03 and 2003-04 in Paki- stan. The experiment comprised four weed-control practices, viz. weedy check, pre-emergence application of pendimethalin, post-emergence application of isoproturon + carfentrazone ethyl and manual weed control (two hoeings), and four irrigation levels, viz. 0.50, 0.75, 1 .OO and 1.25 irrigation water (IW): cumulative pan evapora- tion (CPE). The manual hoeing resulted in minimum weed density and dry weight of weeds, and gave maximum grain yield of 62.46 and 61.45 qlha due to more spike-bearing tillers, 1,000-grain weight and number of grains1 spike, but was statistically similar to post-emergence application of isoproturon + carfentrazone ethyl. The effect of irrigation levels on weed density and dry weight of weeds was non-signifcant in 2002-03 but was significant in 2003-04. The maximum grain yield was obtained at 1.25 IW:CPE.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manual hoeing gave the minimum weed density and dry weight of weeds among the weed-control practices in wheat.

Treatment
manual hoeinge1
Outcome
weed density and dry weight of weedse1
Direction
minimume1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–182 · show in text ↑
e1

“The manual hoeing resulted in minimum weed density and dry weight of weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–640 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manual hoeing gave a maximum wheat grain yield of 62.46 and 61.45 q/ha in the two seasons.

Treatment
manual hoeinge1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
maximume1
Value
62.46 and 61.45 qlhae1
Setting
field experimente2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–182 · show in text ↑
e1

“The manual hoeing resulted in minimum weed density and dry weight of weeds, and gave maximum grain yield of 62.46 and 61.45 qlha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–694 · show in text ↑
e2

“A field experiment was conducted to study the effect of different weed-control practices and irrigation levels on weeds and yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–138 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum wheat grain yield under manual hoeing is attributed to more spike-bearing tillers, 1,000-grain weight and grains per spike.

Outcome
grain yielde1
Qualifier
more spike-bearing tillers, 1,000-grain weight and number of grains1 spikee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–182 · show in text ↑
e1

“gave maximum grain yield of 62.46 and 61.45 qlha due to more spike-bearing tillers, 1,000-grain weight and number of grains1 spike”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–776 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manual hoeing gave a grain yield statistically similar to post-emergence application of isoproturon + carfentrazone ethyl in wheat.

Treatment
manual hoeinge1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
statistically similare1
Comparator
post-emergence application of isoproturon + carfentrazone ethyle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–182 · show in text ↑
e1

“The manual hoeing resulted in minimum weed density and dry weight of weeds, and gave maximum grain yield of 62.46 and 61.45 qlha due to more spike-bearing tillers, 1,000-grain weight and number of grains1 spike, but was statistically similar to post-emergence application of isoproturon + carfentrazone ethyl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–874 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The effect of irrigation levels on weed density and dry weight of weeds was not significant in 2002-03.

Treatment
irrigation levelse1
Outcome
weed density and dry weight of weedse1
Qualifier
2002-03e1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–182 · show in text ↑
e1

“The effect of irrigation levels on weed density and dry weight of weeds was non-signifcant in 2002-03 but was significant in 2003-04”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1008 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The effect of irrigation levels on weed density and dry weight of weeds was significant in 2003-04.

Treatment
irrigation levelse1
Outcome
weed density and dry weight of weedse1
Qualifier
2003-04e1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–182 · show in text ↑
e1

“The effect of irrigation levels on weed density and dry weight of weeds was non-signifcant in 2002-03 but was significant in 2003-04”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1008 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum wheat grain yield was obtained at the 1.25 IW:CPE irrigation level.

Treatment
1.25 IW:CPEe1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
maximume1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–182 · show in text ↑
e1

“The maximum grain yield was obtained at 1.25 IW:CPE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1061 · show in text ↑

irrigation · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 15 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.