Abstract
To develop an IPM module against cotton leafhopper different tactics like, leafhopper resistant cultivar (KC 2) were integrated in different combinations and were evaluated. When the susceptible LRA 5166 was raised from imidacloprid treated seed with cluster bean intercrop and need based application of dimethoate 0.03 % leafhopper population was reduced by 79.01 per cent and seed cotton yield increased by 31.76 %. The pest reduction was 57.08 % with mere introduction of resistant cultivar viz., KC 2; the yield increase was 58.82 %. The yield increase was 125.88 % when the resistant cultivar KC 2 was raised from imidacloprid treated seeds, grown with cluster bean intercrop and applied with dimethoate on need basis.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated tactics reduced leafhopper population by 79.01%.
- Taxon
- COTTON
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Material
- LRA 5166e0
- Treatment
- imidacloprid treated seed with cluster bean intercrop and need based application of dimethoate 0.03 %e0
- Interactor
- AMRASCA DEVASTANSt0pest
- Outcome
- leafhopper populatione0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 79.01 per cente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“When the susceptible LRA 5166 was raised from imidacloprid treated seed with cluster bean intercrop and need based application of dimethoate 0.03 % leafhopper population was reduced by 79.01 per cent”
t0“LEAFHOPPER, AMRASCA DEVASTANS (DISTANT) IN COTTON”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated tactics increased seed cotton yield by 31.76%.
- Taxon
- COTTONGossypium hirsutumt0
- Material
- LRA 5166e0
- Treatment
- imidacloprid treated seed with cluster bean intercrop and need based application of dimethoate 0.03 %e0
- Outcome
- seed cotton yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 31.76 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“When the susceptible LRA 5166 was raised from imidacloprid treated seed with cluster bean intercrop and need based application of dimethoate 0.03 % leafhopper population was reduced by 79.01 per cent and seed cotton yield increased by 31.76 %”
t0“COTTON”
Claim · model-written summary
Resistant KC 2 reduced leafhopper population by 57.08%.
- Taxon
- COTTONGossypium hirsutumt0
- Material
- KC 2e0
- Treatment
- introduction of resistant cultivar viz., KC 2e0
- Interactor
- AMRASCA DEVASTANSt0pest
- Outcome
- pest reductione0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 57.08 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The pest reduction was 57.08 % with mere introduction of resistant cultivar viz., KC 2”
t0“LEAFHOPPER, AMRASCA DEVASTANS (DISTANT) IN COTTON”
Claim · model-written summary
Resistant KC 2 increased yield by 58.82%.
- Taxon
- COTTONGossypium hirsutumt0
- Material
- KC 2e0
- Treatment
- introduction of resistant cultivar viz., KC 2e0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 58.82 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The pest reduction was 57.08 % with mere introduction of resistant cultivar viz., KC 2; the yield increase was 58.82 %”
t0“COTTON”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined treatment of KC 2 increased yield by 125.88%.
- Taxon
- COTTONGossypium hirsutumt0
- Material
- KC 2e0
- Treatment
- imidacloprid treated seeds, grown with cluster bean intercrop and applied with dimethoate on need basise0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 125.88 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The yield increase was 125.88 % when the resistant cultivar KC 2 was raised from imidacloprid treated seeds, grown with cluster bean intercrop and applied with dimethoate on need basis”
t0“COTTON”
The same questions in other papers
dimethoate · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →dimethoate · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →imidacloprid · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
28 papers more in this group
See all 32 papers →imidacloprid · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
14 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →intercropping · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ
84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
100 papers more in this group
See all 104 papers →intercropping · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.