Paper · 2023 · ˜The œjournal of cotton science/Journal of cotton science

Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Control in Dicamba-Tolerant Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) when Applied with Various Dicamba + Insecticide Tank-Mixtures

Jacob McNeal; Darrin Dodds; Angus Catchot; et al.

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Postemergence herbicide application timings for Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) often coincide with foliar insecticide applications in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Combining multiple pesticides into a single application increases efficiency while reducing overall application cost. Multiple foliar insecticides are now labeled for dicamba tank-mixes. However, there is limited literature with respect to efficacy of dicamba on Palmer amaranth control when applied with insecticides. Field experiments were conducted from 2018 to 2020 to evaluate the effect of carrier volume and insecticide on the efficacy of dicamba (XtendiMaxTM with VaporGripTM) to control Palmer amaranth in XtendFlex™ cotton production systems. Dicamba was tank-mixed with acephate and dimethoate to four-leaf cotton and with thiamethoxam and sulfoxaflor just prior to bloom. Applications were made at carrier volumes of 140 and 280 L ha-1 and with a single spray droplet size of 800 µm. Palmer amaranth control 7 d after treatment was negatively impacted when applications included dimethoate; however, no corresponding response in seedcotton yield was observed relative to dicamba applied alone. However, when pooled over carrier volume, applications containing dicamba + acephate resulted in higher seedcotton yield than applications of dicamba + dimethoate. Additionally, pre-bloom applications of dicamba + thiamethoxam or sulfoxaflor increased Palmer amaranth efficacy relative to dicamba applied alone. Although certain insecticides are known to increase herbicidal crop response, the impact of insecticides on herbicide efficacy to control specific weed species is largely unknown. Therefore, we conclude that multiple dicamba + acephate, thiamethoxam, or sulfoxaflor tank-mixtures provide similar control of Palmer amaranth compared to dicamba alone.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dimethoate in the dicamba tank-mix reduced Palmer amaranth control 7 days after treatment compared with dicamba alone.

Treatment
dimethoatee0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe0weed
Outcome
Palmer amaranth control 7 d after treatmente0
Direction
negatively impactede0
Comparator
dicamba applied alonee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Palmer amaranth control 7 d after treatment was negatively impacted when applications included dimethoate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1070 · show in text ↑
e1

“however, no corresponding response in seedcotton yield was observed relative to dicamba applied alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1173 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dicamba-Tolerant Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dimethoate in the dicamba tank-mix did not change seedcotton yield relative to dicamba alone.

Treatment
dimethoatee0
Outcome
seedcotton yielde1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Comparator
dicamba applied alonee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Palmer amaranth control 7 d after treatment was negatively impacted when applications included dimethoate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1070 · show in text ↑
e1

“however, no corresponding response in seedcotton yield was observed relative to dicamba applied alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1173 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dicamba-Tolerant Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dicamba plus acephate gave higher seedcotton yield than dicamba plus dimethoate when pooled over carrier volume.

Treatment
dicamba + acephatee2
Outcome
seedcotton yielde2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
dicamba + dimethoatee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“applications containing dicamba + acephate resulted in higher seedcotton yield than applications of dicamba + dimethoate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1337 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dicamba-Tolerant Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-bloom dicamba plus thiamethoxam increased Palmer amaranth efficacy relative to dicamba alone.

Treatment
thiamethoxame3
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe3weed
Outcome
Palmer amaranth efficacye3
Direction
increasede3
Qualifier
pre-bloome3
Comparator
dicamba applied alonee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“pre-bloom applications of dicamba + thiamethoxam or sulfoxaflor increased Palmer amaranth efficacy relative to dicamba applied alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1353–1485 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dicamba-Tolerant Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-bloom dicamba plus sulfoxaflor increased Palmer amaranth efficacy relative to dicamba alone.

Treatment
sulfoxaflore3
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe3weed
Outcome
Palmer amaranth efficacye3
Direction
increasede3
Qualifier
pre-bloome3
Comparator
dicamba applied alonee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“pre-bloom applications of dicamba + thiamethoxam or sulfoxaflor increased Palmer amaranth efficacy relative to dicamba applied alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1353–1485 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dicamba-Tolerant Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dicamba plus acephate gave similar Palmer amaranth control to dicamba alone.

Treatment
dicamba + acephatee4
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe4weed
Outcome
control of Palmer amaranthe4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4
Comparator
dicamba alonee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“multiple dicamba + acephate, thiamethoxam, or sulfoxaflor tank-mixtures provide similar control of Palmer amaranth compared to dicamba alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1695–1835 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dicamba-Tolerant Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dicamba plus thiamethoxam gave similar Palmer amaranth control to dicamba alone.

Treatment
thiamethoxame4
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe4weed
Outcome
control of Palmer amaranthe4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4
Comparator
dicamba alonee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“multiple dicamba + acephate, thiamethoxam, or sulfoxaflor tank-mixtures provide similar control of Palmer amaranth compared to dicamba alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1695–1835 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dicamba-Tolerant Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dicamba plus sulfoxaflor gave similar Palmer amaranth control to dicamba alone.

Treatment
sulfoxaflore4
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe4weed
Outcome
control of Palmer amaranthe4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4
Comparator
dicamba alonee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“multiple dicamba + acephate, thiamethoxam, or sulfoxaflor tank-mixtures provide similar control of Palmer amaranth compared to dicamba alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1695–1835 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dicamba-Tolerant Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–92 · show in text ↑

acephate · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

dimethoate · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

dimethoate · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

dicamba · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

dicamba · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

sulfoxaflor · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

acephate · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.