Paper · 2019 · Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment

Isolation and identification of a marine actinomycete strain and its control efficacy against citrus green and blue moulds

Xiurong Hu; Baoping Cheng; Danchao Du; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The most serious citrus postharvest diseases are citrus green mould caused by Penicillium digitatum and citrus blue mould caused by Penicillium italicum. Marine microorganisms have become a new measure in the control of these diseases. In this study, we isolated 56 marine actinomycetes, and strain AM-4 isolated from Drupa granulata exhibited the strongest antagonistic activity against P. digitatum. Molecular, morphological, cultural and physio-biochemical analysis identified strain AM-4 as Streptomyces chumphonensis. Strain AM-4 also exhibited antagonistic activity against 11 other phytopathogens, with an inhibition zone width ranging from 0.65 ± 0.04 to 2.35 ± 0.02 cm. The mycelial growth inhibition rates of the fermentation liquid of strain AM-4 against P. digitatum and P. italicum were 66.23% and 61.42%, respectively, and the conidial germination inhibition rates were 65.77% and 62.13%, respectively. The relative control efficacy of the gradient-diluted fermentation extracts of strain AM-4 against citrus green mould caused by P. digitatum ranged from 77.95% to 92.91% at 5 days post inoculation and 56.30% to 87.22% 10 days after inoculation. The relative control efficacy of the gradient diluted fermentation extracts of strain AM-4 against citrus blue mould caused by P. italicum ranged from 61.32% to 84.91% 5 days after inoculation and from 51.34% to 80.92% 10 days after inoculation. The relative control efficacy of the fermentation extracts of strain AM-4 was even better than prochloraz against citrus green mould caused by prochloraz-resistant P. digitatum. Therefore, as a biological control strain, AM-4 has a good prospect for development and utilization potential.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM-4 showed the strongest antagonistic activity against P. digitatum among isolates.

Taxon
citrusCitrust0
Material
strain AM-4e0
Interactor
P. digitatumPenicillium digitatume0pathogen
Outcome
antagonistic activity against P. digitatume0
Direction
strongeste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium digitatum
Penicillium digitatum · InteractorKeith Seifert · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strain AM-4 isolated from Drupa granulata exhibited the strongest antagonistic activity against P. digitatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–400 · show in text ↑
t0

“citrus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM-4 was identified as Streptomyces chumphonensis.

Taxon
citrusCitrust0
Interactor
Streptomyces chumphonensisStreptomyces chumphonensise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
identified strain AM-4 as Streptomyces chumphonensise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“identified strain AM-4 as Streptomyces chumphonensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–521 · show in text ↑
t0

“citrus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM-4 inhibited 11 other phytopathogens with zones of 0.65 ± 0.04 to 2.35 ± 0.02 cm.

Taxon
citrusCitrust0
Interactor
phytopathogense0pathogen
Outcome
inhibition zone widthe0
Value
0.65 ± 0.04 to 2.35 ± 0.02 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Strain AM-4 also exhibited antagonistic activity against 11 other phytopathogens, with an inhibition zone width ranging from 0.65 ± 0.04 to 2.35 ± 0.02 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–677 · show in text ↑
t0

“citrus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM-4 fermentation liquid inhibited P. digitatum mycelial growth by 66.23%.

Taxon
citrusCitrust0
Treatment
fermentation liquid of strain AM-4e0
Interactor
P. digitatumPenicillium digitatume0pathogen
Outcome
mycelial growth inhibition ratese0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
66.23%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium digitatum
Penicillium digitatum · InteractorKeith Seifert · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mycelial growth inhibition rates of the fermentation liquid of strain AM-4 against P. digitatum and P. italicum were 66.23% and 61.42%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–831 · show in text ↑
t0

“citrus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM-4 fermentation liquid inhibited P. italicum mycelial growth by 61.42%.

Taxon
citrusCitrust0
Treatment
fermentation liquid of strain AM-4e0
Interactor
P. italicumPenicillium italicume0pathogen
Outcome
mycelial growth inhibition ratese0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
61.42%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium italicum
Penicillium italicum · InteractorJean.claude · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mycelial growth inhibition rates of the fermentation liquid of strain AM-4 against P. digitatum and P. italicum were 66.23% and 61.42%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–831 · show in text ↑
t0

“citrus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM-4 fermentation liquid inhibited P. digitatum conidial germination by 65.77%.

Taxon
citrusCitrust0
Treatment
fermentation liquid of strain AM-4e1
Interactor
P. digitatumPenicillium digitatume1pathogen
Outcome
conidial germination inhibition ratese0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
65.77%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium digitatum
Penicillium digitatum · InteractorKeith Seifert · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the conidial germination inhibition rates were 65.77% and 62.13%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–915 · show in text ↑
e1

“The mycelial growth inhibition rates of the fermentation liquid of strain AM-4 against P. digitatum and P. italicum were 66.23% and 61.42%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–831 · show in text ↑
t0

“citrus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM-4 fermentation liquid inhibited P. italicum conidial germination by 62.13%.

Taxon
citrusCitrust0
Outcome
conidial germination inhibition ratese0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
62.13%e0

Not reportedInteractorTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the conidial germination inhibition rates were 65.77% and 62.13%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–915 · show in text ↑
t0

“citrus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM-4 extracts controlled citrus green mould by 77.95% to 92.91% at five days.

Taxon
citrusCitruse0
Treatment
gradient-diluted fermentation extracts of strain AM-4e0
Interactor
P. digitatumPenicillium digitatume0pathogen
Outcome
relative control efficacye0
Direction
controle0
Value
77.95% to 92.91%e0
Qualifier
5 days post inoculatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium digitatum
Penicillium digitatum · InteractorKeith Seifert · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relative control efficacy of the gradient-diluted fermentation extracts of strain AM-4 against citrus green mould caused by P. digitatum ranged from 77.95% to 92.91% at 5 days post inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM-4 extracts controlled citrus green mould by 56.30% to 87.22% at ten days.

Taxon
citrusCitrust0
Interactor
P. digitatumPenicillium digitatume1pathogen
Outcome
citrus green moulde1
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
56.30% to 87.22%e0
Qualifier
10 days after inoculatione0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium digitatum
Penicillium digitatum · InteractorKeith Seifert · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“56.30% to 87.22% 10 days after inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1160 · show in text ↑
e1

“The relative control efficacy of the gradient-diluted fermentation extracts of strain AM-4 against citrus green mould caused by P. digitatum ranged from 77.95% to 92.91% at 5 days post inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1113 · show in text ↑
t0

“citrus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM-4 extracts controlled citrus blue mould by 61.32% to 84.91% at five days.

Taxon
citrusCitruse0
Treatment
gradient diluted fermentation extracts of strain AM-4e0
Interactor
P. italicumPenicillium italicume0pathogen
Outcome
relative control efficacye0
Direction
controle0
Value
61.32% to 84.91%e0
Qualifier
5 days after inoculatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium italicum
Penicillium italicum · InteractorJean.claude · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relative control efficacy of the gradient diluted fermentation extracts of strain AM-4 against citrus blue mould caused by P. italicum ranged from 61.32% to 84.91% 5 days after inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1354 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM-4 extracts controlled citrus blue mould by 51.34% to 80.92% at ten days.

Taxon
citrusCitrust0
Interactor
P. italicumPenicillium italicume1pathogen
Outcome
citrus blue moulde1
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
51.34% to 80.92%e0
Qualifier
10 days after inoculatione0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium italicum
Penicillium italicum · InteractorJean.claude · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“from 51.34% to 80.92% 10 days after inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1406 · show in text ↑
e1

“The relative control efficacy of the gradient diluted fermentation extracts of strain AM-4 against citrus blue mould caused by P. italicum ranged from 61.32% to 84.91% 5 days after inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1354 · show in text ↑
t0

“citrus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM-4 extracts outperformed prochloraz against resistant P. digitatum citrus green mould.

Taxon
citrusCitruse0
Treatment
fermentation extracts of strain AM-4e0
Interactor
P. digitatumPenicillium digitatume0pathogen
Outcome
relative control efficacye0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
prochloraze0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium digitatum
Penicillium digitatum · InteractorKeith Seifert · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relative control efficacy of the fermentation extracts of strain AM-4 was even better than prochloraz against citrus green mould caused by prochloraz-resistant P. digitatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1584 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors see development potential for AM-4 as a biological control strain.

Taxon
citrusCitrust0
Interactor
AM-4e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
development and utilization potentiale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“as a biological control strain, AM-4 has a good prospect for development and utilization potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1597–1695 · show in text ↑
t0

“citrus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–100 · show in text ↑

botanical · Penicillium digitatum · CitrusPositive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

processing · Penicillium italicum · CitrusResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

processing · Penicillium digitatum · CitrusResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · Penicillium italicum · CitrusResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.