Abstract
Roses is one of popular and widely cultivated commodities in Indonesia. Based on usefulness, roses can be classified into cut flowers, potted flowers and garden elements. Roses used as garden ornamental plants because it is able to improve aesthetics of garden and create comfortable atmosphere for visitors garden. The purposes of the research was to study the effect and obtain the level of pruning and appropriate concentration of foliar fertilizer for growth and flowering of roses. The hypothesis of the research were to get influence and get right level of pruning and foliar fertilizer concentration that can increase growth and flowering of roses. The research was conducted in March to June 2018 at Venus Orchid and Nursery, Malang. Split Plot Design with 3 repetition, foliar fertilizer as main plot and prunning as sub plot. Parameters observed included growth and flowering roses. Growth variables include number of shoots (shoots), length of branches (cm), time of budding (hsp), number of leaves (strands), and leaf area (cm 2 ). Flowering variables include the number of flowers (flower per plant), the length of the stalk flower (cm), the diameter of the flower (cm), time of flowering (hsp), time of blooming (hsp), and vase life (day). The results showed that 1500 ppm concentration of foliar fertilizer with hard pinch 1 pruning was able to increase 34.47% of the branch length, accelerate the emergence of branch buds 70 days, increase 3.66 flowers and accelerate 14.16 days when flowering on roses compared to treatments without pruning and foliar fertilizer
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar fertilizer at 1500 ppm with hard pinch 1 pruning increased rose branch length by 34.47% relative to no pruning and no foliar fertilizer.
Verbatim
e0“1500 ppm concentration of foliar fertilizer with hard pinch 1 pruning”
e1“increase 34.47% of the branch length”
e2“roses compared to treatments without pruning and foliar fertilizer”
e3“Venus Orchid and Nursery, Malang”
Claim · model-written summary
The same treatment accelerated emergence of branch buds by 70 days compared with the untreated roses.
Verbatim
e0“1500 ppm concentration of foliar fertilizer with hard pinch 1 pruning”
e1“accelerate the emergence of branch buds 70 days”
e2“roses compared to treatments without pruning and foliar fertilizer”
e3“Venus Orchid and Nursery, Malang”
Claim · model-written summary
The same treatment increased flower number by 3.66 flowers compared with the untreated roses.
Verbatim
e0“1500 ppm concentration of foliar fertilizer with hard pinch 1 pruning”
e1“increase 3.66 flowers”
e2“roses compared to treatments without pruning and foliar fertilizer”
e3“Venus Orchid and Nursery, Malang”
Claim · model-written summary
The same treatment accelerated flowering by 14.16 days compared with the untreated roses.
Verbatim
e0“1500 ppm concentration of foliar fertilizer with hard pinch 1 pruning”
e1“accelerate 14.16 days when flowering”
e2“roses compared to treatments without pruning and foliar fertilizer”
e3“Venus Orchid and Nursery, Malang”
The same questions in other papers
pruning · phenology · RosaPositive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →application · phenology · RosaPositive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →pruning · growth · RosaPositive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →application · growth · RosaPositive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →fertilization · growth · RosaPositive and negative results
23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
24 papers more in this group
See all 28 papers →fertilization · phenology · RosaResults agree
13 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.