Paper · 2006 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

Effect of horticultural practices for sustainable production of rose in partially modified greenhouse

D. Barman; Rajni Kumari; R.C. Upadhyaya; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted in a partially modified greenhouse to standardize the cultural practices for sustainable production of rose cv. First Red. The plants grown in the growing medium consisting of 2 soil: 1 compost: 1 and at 40 kPa irrigation regime and supplied with 200 and 300 kg N and K2O/ha/yr respectively through fertigation (water soluble fertilizers), spraying of polyfed + micronutrients (2 g/l) at monthly interval from September to January + bending 6 weeks after planting (M 4); advanced flowering by about one month whereas floral characters viz., bud length, pedicel length and flower diameter were improved when sand was replaced by cocopeat and irrigation regime were maintained at 20 kPa (M-2). Maximum flower yield in respect of number of flowers/m2 per year and per month were recorded with medium combination Soil: 1 compost: 1 cocopeat at 40 kPa irrigation regime keeping all other inputs the same (M-5).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The M4 cultural practice advanced flowering of First Red rose by about one month.

Taxon
rosee0
Material
First Rede0
Treatment
spraying of polyfed + micronutrients (2 g/l) at monthly interval from September to January + bending 6 weeks after planting (M 4)e1
Outcome
floweringe1
Direction
advancede1
Value
about one monthe1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“rose cv. First Red”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–149 · show in text ↑
e1

“spraying of polyfed + micronutrients (2 g/l) at monthly interval from September to January + bending 6 weeks after planting (M 4); advanced flowering by about one month”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–536 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Replacing sand with cocopeat and maintaining 20 kPa irrigation improved rose bud length, pedicel length and flower diameter.

Taxon
rosee0
Material
First Rede0
Treatment
cocopeat and irrigation regime were maintained at 20 kPa (M-2)e1
Outcome
bud length, pedicel length and flower diametere1
Direction
improvede1
Comparator
sande1

Verbatim

e0

“rose cv. First Red”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–149 · show in text ↑
e1

“floral characters viz., bud length, pedicel length and flower diameter were improved when sand was replaced by cocopeat and irrigation regime were maintained at 20 kPa (M-2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–718 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M5 medium and 40 kPa irrigation produced maximum annual and monthly rose flower counts.

Taxon
rosee0
Material
First Rede0
Treatment
Soil: 1 compost: 1 cocopeat at 40 kPa irrigation regimee1
Outcome
number of flowers/m2 per year and per monthe1
Direction
Maximume1

Verbatim

e0

“rose cv. First Red”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–149 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum flower yield in respect of number of flowers/m2 per year and per month were recorded with medium combination Soil: 1 compost: 1 cocopeat at 40 kPa irrigation regime keeping all other inputs the same (M-5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–932 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · RosaPositive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

application · phenology · RosaPositive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

growing medium · growth · RosaPositive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.