Paper · 2010 · Weed Technology

Microencapsulated Herbicide-Treated Bark Mulches for Nursery Container Weed Control

Hannah M. Mathers; Luke T. Case

12
claims
13
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Nursery container preemergence herbicides must be applied multiple times, usually every 6 to 8 wk, in order to maintain acceptable weed control. Nursery growers have identified extended duration of container preemergence activity as a research priority for reduction of herbicide usage and costs. The objective of this study was to determine if the combination of slow-release (microencapsulated [ME]) formulations of alachlor and acetochlor with wood-based organic mulches could provide extended efficacy and reduced phytotoxicity vs. over-the-top (OTT) sprays or mulch alone. Efficacy and phytotoxicity studies were conducted over 3 yr with various plants. Both acetochlor formulation OTT sprays reduced spirea shoot dry weights at 45 and 110 days after treatment (DAT) compared with the controls, and emulsifiable concentrate (EC) acetochlor OTT spray also reduced shoot dry weights of rose. No herbicide-treated bark mulch (TBM) combination reduced rose or spirea shoot dry weights. EC acetochlor + hardwood (in 2003) was the only treatment to provide 100% weed control at 45 and 110 DAT. The addition of EC or ME acetochlor to mulch reduced phytotoxicity and extended efficacy in 2002 and 2003; alachlor EC or ME TBM did not. Regardless of bark type, 3-yr average EC and ME TBM were 80% more effective than untreated bark mulch (UBM) and 83% and 98% more effective at 45 and 110 DAT, respectively than their comparable OTT sprays. Of the eight treatments that received ratings above commercially acceptable, averaged over dates and years, the three providing the least phytotoxicity and greatest extent, consistency, and duration of efficacy were all TBM combinations: EC acetochlor + Douglas fir or hardwood bark, EC acetochlor + pine, and ME acetochlor + pine. TBM-reduced phytotoxicity compared with OTT sprays.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetochlor OTT sprays reduced spirea shoot dry weight versus controls at 45 and 110 DAT.

Taxon
spireae0
Organ / stage
shoote0
Treatment
acetochlor formulation OTT sprayse0
Outcome
shoot dry weightse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
45 and 110 days after treatment (DAT)e0
Comparator
the controlse0

Verbatim

e0

“Both acetochlor formulation OTT sprays reduced spirea shoot dry weights at 45 and 110 days after treatment (DAT) compared with the controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–798 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EC acetochlor OTT spray reduced rose shoot dry weight.

Taxon
rosee0
Organ / stage
shoote0
Treatment
emulsifiable concentrate (EC) acetochlor OTT spraye0
Outcome
shoot dry weightse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“emulsifiable concentrate (EC) acetochlor OTT spray also reduced shoot dry weights of rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–893 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No herbicide-treated bark mulch combination reduced rose shoot dry weight.

Taxon
rosee0
Organ / stage
shoote0
Treatment
herbicide-treated bark mulch (TBM) combinatione0
Outcome
shoot dry weightse0
Direction
Noe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“No herbicide-treated bark mulch (TBM) combination reduced rose or spirea shoot dry weights”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–985 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No herbicide-treated bark mulch combination reduced spirea shoot dry weight.

Taxon
spireae0
Organ / stage
shoote0
Treatment
herbicide-treated bark mulch (TBM) combinatione0
Outcome
shoot dry weightse0
Direction
Noe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“No herbicide-treated bark mulch (TBM) combination reduced rose or spirea shoot dry weights”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–985 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EC acetochlor plus hardwood gave 100% weed control at 45 and 110 DAT in 2003.

Treatment
EC acetochlor + hardwoode0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
onlye0
Value
100%e0
Qualifier
45 and 110 DATe0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“EC acetochlor + hardwood (in 2003) was the only treatment to provide 100% weed control at 45 and 110 DAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1091 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nursery Container Weed Control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding EC or ME acetochlor to mulch reduced phytotoxicity and extended efficacy in 2002 and 2003.

Treatment
EC or ME acetochlor to mulche0
Outcome
phytotoxicity and extended efficacye0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
2002 and 2003e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of EC or ME acetochlor to mulch reduced phytotoxicity and extended efficacy in 2002 and 2003”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alachlor EC or ME treated bark mulch did not reduce phytotoxicity and extend efficacy.

Treatment
alachlor EC or ME TBMe0
Outcome
did note0
Direction
did note0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“alachlor EC or ME TBM did not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across bark types, EC and ME treated bark mulch was 80% more effective than untreated bark mulch.

Treatment
EC and ME TBMe0
Outcome
more effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Value
80%e0
Qualifier
3-yr averagee0
Comparator
untreated bark mulch (UBM)e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Regardless of bark type, 3-yr average EC and ME TBM were 80% more effective than untreated bark mulch (UBM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1338 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated bark mulch was 83% more effective than comparable OTT sprays at 45 DAT.

Outcome
more effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Value
83%e0
Qualifier
45 and 110 DATe0
Comparator
comparable OTT sprayse0

Not reportedTaxonTreatment

Verbatim

e0

“83% and 98% more effective at 45 and 110 DAT, respectively than their comparable OTT sprays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1434 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated bark mulch was 98% more effective than comparable OTT sprays at 110 DAT.

Outcome
more effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Value
98%e0
Qualifier
45 and 110 DATe0
Comparator
comparable OTT sprayse0

Not reportedTaxonTreatment

Verbatim

e0

“83% and 98% more effective at 45 and 110 DAT, respectively than their comparable OTT sprays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1434 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three acetochlor treated bark mulch combinations had the least phytotoxicity and greatest extent, consistency and duration of efficacy among acceptable treatments.

Treatment
EC acetochlor + Douglas fir or hardwood bark, EC acetochlor + pine, and ME acetochlor + pinee0
Outcome
least phytotoxicity and greatest extent, consistency, and duration of efficacye0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the three providing the least phytotoxicity and greatest extent, consistency, and duration of efficacy were all TBM combinations: EC acetochlor + Douglas fir or hardwood bark, EC acetochlor + pine, and ME acetochlor + pine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1544–1766 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated bark mulch reduced phytotoxicity relative to OTT sprays.

Treatment
TBMe0
Outcome
phytotoxicitye0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
OTT sprayse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“TBM-reduced phytotoxicity compared with OTT sprays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1768–1818 · show in text ↑

herbicide · growth · RosaPositive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

mulching · growth · RosaPositive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · growth · RosaPositive and negative results

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.