Paper · 2019 · In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant

Improved plant regeneration in callus cultures of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench

Mariola Dreger; Rafał Mól; Aleksandra Deja; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
28
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Sorghum bicolor is a recalcitrant species for tissue culture regeneration and genetic transformation. Browning of explants is one of the factors limiting organ and tissue cultures. To overcome this, callus tissue was initiated from the shoot tips of in vitro germinating seeds (S. bicolor cv. Róna 1), and then cultured on modified MS media (Murashige and Skoog in Physiol Plant 15:473–497, 1962). In the first experiment, we tested callus induction on several media supplemented with casein hydrolysate, polyvinylpyrrolidone, honey, and sucrose. The best callus induction was recorded for the medium with honey and sucrose (80.0%) and for control medium (79.8%). Shoot regeneration was tested on the MS medium with 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) supplemented with honey and sucrose at a 1:1 ratio (by weight) or with sucrose only. The highest percentage of calluses regenerating shoots was noted for those induced on the medium with sucrose and honey—approx. four times higher when compared to the control. Rooted plantlets were acclimatized with a 92% survival rate. In the second experiment, we analyzed culture responses to various ways of honey application to the induction media: honey (autoclaved or filtered) in presence or absence of sucrose. Supplementation of the medium with fructose, glucose, and maltose at a proportion typical for honey was also investigated. The explant and callus survival rates were similar to those of the honey–sucrose combination in the first experiment. Only presence of both sucrose and honey in the induction medium improved the total regeneration rate to 37.9% over the control (18.8%). Sucrose and honey appear to act synergistically for shoot regeneration in callus cultures of sorghum.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Honey and sucrose medium produced 80.0% callus induction.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
medium with honey and sucrosee0
Outcome
callus inductione0
Direction
beste0
Value
80.0%e0
Qualifier
79.8%e0
Comparator
control mediume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The best callus induction was recorded for the medium with honey and sucrose (80.0%) and for control medium (79.8%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–663 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Honey and sucrose induction medium yielded about four times more shoot-regenerating calluses than control.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
medium with sucrose and honeye0
Outcome
percentage of calluses regenerating shootse0
Direction
highere0
Value
approx. four timese0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest percentage of calluses regenerating shoots was noted for those induced on the medium with sucrose and honey—approx. four times higher when compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–1002 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acclimatized rooted plantlets survived at 92%.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Organ / stage
Rooted plantletse0
Outcome
survival ratee0
Value
92%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rooted plantlets were acclimatized with a 92% survival rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1063 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Explant and callus survival rates under second-experiment treatments resembled the honey-sucrose combination.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
honey (autoclaved or filtered) in presence or absence of sucrosee1
Outcome
explant and callus survival ratese0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
honey–sucrose combinatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The explant and callus survival rates were similar to those of the honey–sucrose combination in the first experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1487 · show in text ↑
e1

“honey (autoclaved or filtered) in presence or absence of sucrose.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1246 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only combined sucrose and honey improved total regeneration to 37.9% versus 18.8% control.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
presence of both sucrose and honey in the induction mediume0
Outcome
total regeneration ratee0
Direction
improvede0
Value
37.9%e0
Qualifier
18.8%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only presence of both sucrose and honey in the induction medium improved the total regeneration rate to 37.9% over the control (18.8%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1623 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer synergistic action of sucrose and honey on shoot regeneration.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
Sucrose and honeye0
Outcome
shoot regeneratione0
Qualifier
appear to act synergisticallye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sucrose and honey appear to act synergistically for shoot regeneration in callus cultures of sorghum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1624–1725 · show in text ↑

sucrose · growth · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

in vitro · growth · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.