Paper · 2018 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Impact of Beneficial Microorganisms on Strawberry Growth, Fruit Production, Nutritional Quality, and Volatilome

Valeria Todeschini; Nassima AitLahmidi; Eleonora Mazzucco; et al.

13
claims
30
verbatim quotes
143
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) colonize the roots of most terrestrial plant species, improving plant growth, nutrient uptake and biotic/abiotic stress resistance and tolerance. Similarly, plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB) enhance plant fitness and production. In this study, three different AMF (Funneliformis mosseae, Septoglomus viscosum and Rhizophagus irregularis) were used in combination with three different strains of Pseudomonas sp. (19Fv1t, 5vm1K and Pf4) to inoculate plantlets of Fragaria x ananassa var. Eliana F1. The effects of the different fungus/bacterium combinations were assessed on plant growth parameters, fruit production and quality, including health-promoting compounds. Inoculated and uninoculated plants were maintained in a greenhouse for 4 months and irrigated with a nutrient solution at two different phosphate levels. The number of flowers and fruits were recorded weekly. At harvest, fresh and dry weights of roots and shoots, mycorrhizal colonization and concentration of leaf photosynthetic pigments were measured in each plant. The following fruit parameters were recorded: pH, titratable acids, concentration of organic acids, soluble sugars, ascorbic acids and anthocyanidins; volatile and elemental composition were also evaluated. Data were statistically analyzed by ANOVA and PCA/PCA-DA. Mycorrhizal colonization was higher in plants inoculated with R. irregularis, followed by F. mosseae and S. viscosum. In general, AMF mostly affected the parameters associated with the vegetative portion of the plant, while PGPB were especially relevant for fruit yield and quality. The plant physiological status was differentially affected by inoculations, resulting in enhanced root and shoot biomass. Inoculation with Pf4 bacterial strain increased flower and fruit production per plant and malic acid content in fruits, while decreased the pH value, regardless of the used fungus. Inoculations affected fruit nutritional quality, increasing sugar and anthocyanin concentrations, and modulated pH, malic acid, volatile compounds and elements. In the present study, we show for the first time that strawberry fruit concentration of some elements and/or volatiles can be affected by the presence of specific beneficial soil microorganisms. In addition, our results indicated that it is possible to select the best plant-microorganism combination for field applications, and improving fruit production and quality, also in terms of health promoting properties.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

R. irregularis produced the highest mycorrhizal colonization.

Taxon
Fragaria x ananassaFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
inoculated with R. irregularise0
Interactor
R. irregularisRhizophagus irregularise0symbiont
Outcome
Mycorrhizal colonizatione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
F. mosseae and S. viscosume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizophagus irregularis
Rhizophagus irregularis · InteractorMylène Durant · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizal colonization was higher in plants inoculated with R. irregularis, followed by F. mosseae and S. viscosum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1339–1456 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fragaria x ananassa var. Eliana F1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–535 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF mostly affected vegetative plant parameters.

Taxon
Fragaria x ananassaFragaria ×ananassae1
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
parameters associated with the vegetative portion of the plante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF mostly affected the parameters associated with the vegetative portion of the plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1469–1555 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fragaria x ananassa var. Eliana F1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–535 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPB were especially relevant to fruit yield and quality.

Taxon
Fragaria x ananassaFragaria ×ananassae1
Interactor
PGPBe0symbiont
Outcome
fruit yield and qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PGPB were especially relevant for fruit yield and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1563–1620 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fragaria x ananassa var. Eliana F1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–535 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculations enhanced root and shoot biomass.

Taxon
Fragaria x ananassaFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
inoculationse0
Interactor
AMFe2symbiont
Outcome
root and shoot biomasse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plant physiological status was differentially affected by inoculations, resulting in enhanced root and shoot biomass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1622–1743 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fragaria x ananassa var. Eliana F1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–535 · show in text ↑
e2

“Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pf4 inoculation increased flower production per plant regardless of fungus.

Taxon
Fragaria x ananassaFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
Inoculation with Pf4 bacterial straine0
Interactor
Pf4 bacterial straine0symbiont
Outcome
flower and fruit production per plante0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with Pf4 bacterial strain increased flower and fruit production per plant and malic acid content in fruits, while decreased the pH value, regardless of the used fungus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1744–1924 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fragaria x ananassa var. Eliana F1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–535 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pf4 inoculation increased fruit production per plant regardless of fungus.

Taxon
Fragaria x ananassaFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
Inoculation with Pf4 bacterial straine0
Interactor
Pf4 bacterial straine0symbiont
Outcome
fruit production per plante0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with Pf4 bacterial strain increased flower and fruit production per plant and malic acid content in fruits, while decreased the pH value, regardless of the used fungus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1744–1924 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fragaria x ananassa var. Eliana F1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–535 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pf4 inoculation increased fruit malic acid content regardless of fungus.

Taxon
Fragaria x ananassaFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
Inoculation with Pf4 bacterial straine0
Interactor
Pf4 bacterial straine0symbiont
Outcome
malic acid content in fruitse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with Pf4 bacterial strain increased flower and fruit production per plant and malic acid content in fruits, while decreased the pH value, regardless of the used fungus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1744–1924 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fragaria x ananassa var. Eliana F1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–535 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pf4 inoculation decreased fruit pH regardless of fungus.

Taxon
Fragaria x ananassaFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
Inoculation with Pf4 bacterial straine0
Interactor
Pf4 bacterial straine0symbiont
Outcome
pH valuee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with Pf4 bacterial strain increased flower and fruit production per plant and malic acid content in fruits, while decreased the pH value, regardless of the used fungus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1744–1924 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fragaria x ananassa var. Eliana F1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–535 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculations increased fruit sugar and anthocyanin concentrations.

Taxon
Fragaria x ananassaFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
Inoculationse0
Interactor
AMFe2symbiont
Outcome
sugar and anthocyanin concentrationse0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculations affected fruit nutritional quality, increasing sugar and anthocyanin concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1925–2021 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fragaria x ananassa var. Eliana F1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–535 · show in text ↑
e2

“Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculations modulated fruit pH, malic acid, and volatile compounds.

Taxon
Fragaria x ananassaFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
Inoculationse2
Outcome
pH, malic acid, volatile compoundse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“modulated pH, malic acid, volatile compounds and elements”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2027–2084 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fragaria x ananassa var. Eliana F1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–535 · show in text ↑
e2

“Inoculations affected fruit nutritional quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1925–1972 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculations modulated fruit elements.

Taxon
Fragaria x ananassaFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
Inoculationse2
Outcome
elementse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“modulated pH, malic acid, volatile compounds and elements”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2027–2084 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fragaria x ananassa var. Eliana F1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–535 · show in text ↑
e2

“Inoculations affected fruit nutritional quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1925–1972 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific beneficial soil microorganisms affected fruit element or volatile concentrations.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Interactor
specific beneficial soil microorganismse0symbiont
Outcome
fruit concentration of some elements and/or volatilese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strawberry fruit concentration of some elements and/or volatiles can be affected by the presence of specific beneficial soil microorganisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2140–2279 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fragaria x ananassa var. Eliana F1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–535 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that plant-microorganism combinations can be selected to improve field fruit production and quality.

Taxon
Fragaria x ananassaFragaria ×ananassae1
Outcome
select the best plant-microorganism combination for field applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it is possible to select the best plant-microorganism combination for field applications, and improving fruit production and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2321–2453 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fragaria x ananassa var. Eliana F1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–535 · show in text ↑

inoculation · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

67 papers: 60 positive, 7 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 15 positive, 3 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

inoculation · quality: phytochemicals · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 27 positive, 1 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

inoculation · growth · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 45 positive, 16 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

inoculation · disease · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

72 papers: 33 positive, 39 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.