Paper · 2019 · Horticultura Brasileira

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi action on the quality of strawberry fruits

Ely Cristina N Cordeiro; Juliano Tadeu V de Resende; Katielle Rosalva V Córdova; et al.

2
claims
6
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT The inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), increasing the rhizospheric influence, might provide higher levels of bioactive compounds. Thus, the objective was to evaluate the influence of the AMF inoculation on the physicochemical components of fruit’s quality in field. Strawberry fruits from cultivars Camarosa, Aromas, Camino Real, Monterey, Portola, San Andreas and Albion in 2016, and Camarosa, Camino Real, Monterey and Albion in 2017 were either inoculated or non-inoculated with AMF. The analyzed physicochemical components of fruit’s quality were ascorbic acid, titrated acidity, pH, soluble solids, soluble solids/titrated acidity ratio, phenolic compounds, anthocyanins, and firmness. The inoculation with AMF on strawberry plants in field improved the fruit’s physicochemical attributes, increasing pH, soluble solids content, soluble solids/titratable acidity ratio and phenolic compounds content in both cultivation years (2016-2017). The inoculation of AMF has improved the characteristics of post-harvest quality in strawberry fruits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation in field increased fruit pH, soluble solids content and soluble solids/titratable acidity ratio.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
inoculation with AMFe2
Interactor
AMFe2symbiont
Outcome
pH, soluble solids content, soluble solids/titratable acidity ratioe2
Direction
increasinge2
Comparator
non-inoculatede1
Setting
in fielde2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“quality of strawberry fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“were either inoculated or non-inoculated with AMF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–510 · show in text ↑
e2

“The inoculation with AMF on strawberry plants in field improved the fruit’s physicochemical attributes, increasing pH, soluble solids content, soluble solids/titratable acidity ratio and phenolic compounds content in both cultivation years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–955 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation in field increased fruit phenolic compounds content.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
inoculation with AMFe2
Interactor
AMFe2symbiont
Outcome
phenolic compounds contente2
Direction
increasinge2
Comparator
non-inoculatede1
Setting
in fielde2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“quality of strawberry fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“were either inoculated or non-inoculated with AMF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–510 · show in text ↑
e2

“The inoculation with AMF on strawberry plants in field improved the fruit’s physicochemical attributes, increasing pH, soluble solids content, soluble solids/titratable acidity ratio and phenolic compounds content in both cultivation years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–955 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · quality: sugar starch · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

inoculation · quality: sugar starch · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

26 papers: 23 positive, 3 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

inoculation · quality: phytochemicals · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 27 positive, 1 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

mycorrhiza · quality: phytochemicals · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.