Paper · 2018 · Annals of Applied Biology

Mechanism of application nursery cultivation arbuscular mycorrhizal seedling in watermelon in the field

Lixuan Ren; Bingshuang Wang; Caipeng Yue; et al.

13
claims
13
verbatim quotes
18
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) colonisation of plant root facilitates the absorption of nutrients such as phosphorus (P) and enhances plant biotic and abiotic resistance generally. However, arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM) colonisation decreases with application of chemical fertiliser. Here, we investigated whether AMF inoculation in nurseries would facilitate AM colonisation and take physiological and ecological functions in watermelon ( Citrullus lanatus ) in the field. Pot experiments were carried out to study the change of AMF colonised seedling on physiology and gene expression in nursery site. Field experiments were performed to investigate the effect of nursery AMF inoculation on yield, quality and disease resistance of watermelon in the field. The results showed that nursery‐inoculated seedlings produced more dry matter and root surface area than non‐inoculated seedlings. Expression of the secretory purple acid phosphatase (PAP) genes ClaPAP10 and ClaPAP26 was up‐regulated following AMF colonisation. Accordingly, acid phosphatase activities at the root surface and P concentrations in seedling were enhanced. After transplantation to the field, the shoot dry matter and P concentration in old stem were higher in the nursery AMF inoculated seedlings than that in non‐AMF inoculated seedling. AMF inoculation also induced increase of yields and decrease of wilt disease indexes and soluble sugar content. In addition, acid phosphatase activities and AMF spore densities were increased by nursery‐inoculation in watermelon rhizosphere soil in the field. In conclusion, nursery colonisation AMF seedling enhanced watermelon growth and yield by improving the root growth and P acquisition in nursery cultivating stage, as well as optimised soil properties in the field. Nursery cultivation of watermelon seedling with AMF was an effective technique to reduce wilt disease in continuous cropped management in watermelon.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nursery inoculation increased seedling dry matter.

Treatment
nursery‐inoculatede0
Outcome
dry mattere0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
non‐inoculated seedlingse0

Not reportedTaxonInteractor

Verbatim

e0

“nursery‐inoculated seedlings produced more dry matter and root surface area than non‐inoculated seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nursery inoculation increased seedling root surface area.

Treatment
nursery‐inoculatede0
Outcome
root surface areae0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
non‐inoculated seedlingse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“nursery‐inoculated seedlings produced more dry matter and root surface area than non‐inoculated seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF colonisation up-regulated ClaPAP10 and ClaPAP26 expression.

Treatment
AMF colonisatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Gene
ClaPAP10 and ClaPAP26e0
Outcome
Expressione0
Direction
up‐regulatede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Expression of the secretory purple acid phosphatase (PAP) genes ClaPAP10 and ClaPAP26 was up‐regulated following AMF colonisation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1020 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF colonisation enhanced root-surface acid phosphatase activity.

Organ / stage
root surfacee0
Outcome
acid phosphatase activities at the root surfacee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“acid phosphatase activities at the root surface and P concentrations in seedling were enhanced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF colonisation enhanced phosphorus concentration in seedlings.

Organ / stage
seedlinge0
Outcome
P concentrations in seedlinge0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“acid phosphatase activities at the root surface and P concentrations in seedling were enhanced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After field transplantation, nursery AMF inoculation increased shoot dry matter.

Organ / stage
shoote0
Treatment
nursery AMF inoculated seedlingse0
Outcome
shoot dry mattere0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
non‐AMF inoculated seedlinge0
Setting
fielde0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“After transplantation to the field, the shoot dry matter and P concentration in old stem were higher in the nursery AMF inoculated seedlings than that in non‐AMF inoculated seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1312 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After field transplantation, nursery AMF inoculation increased P concentration in old stem.

Organ / stage
old steme0
Treatment
nursery AMF inoculated seedlingse0
Outcome
P concentration in old steme0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
non‐AMF inoculated seedlinge0
Setting
fielde0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“After transplantation to the field, the shoot dry matter and P concentration in old stem were higher in the nursery AMF inoculated seedlings than that in non‐AMF inoculated seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1312 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation increased watermelon yields.

Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculation also induced increase of yields and decrease of wilt disease indexes and soluble sugar content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1424 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation decreased wilt disease indexes.

Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
wilt disease indexese0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculation also induced increase of yields and decrease of wilt disease indexes and soluble sugar content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1424 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation decreased soluble sugar content.

Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
soluble sugar contente0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculation also induced increase of yields and decrease of wilt disease indexes and soluble sugar content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1424 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nursery inoculation increased acid phosphatase activity in watermelon rhizosphere soil.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
nursery‐inoculatione0
Outcome
acid phosphatase activitiese0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
fielde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“acid phosphatase activities and AMF spore densities were increased by nursery‐inoculation in watermelon rhizosphere soil in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1439–1572 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nursery inoculation increased AMF spore densities in watermelon rhizosphere soil.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
nursery‐inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
AMF spore densitiese0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
fielde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“acid phosphatase activities and AMF spore densities were increased by nursery‐inoculation in watermelon rhizosphere soil in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1439–1572 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend nursery cultivation of watermelon seedlings with AMF to reduce wilt under continuous cropping.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
reduce wilt diseasee0
Qualifier
continuous cropped managemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nursery cultivation of watermelon seedling with AMF was an effective technique to reduce wilt disease in continuous cropped management in watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1788–1936 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · disease · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

transplanting · growth · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

inoculation · growth · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 19 positive, 3 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

inoculation · disease · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 10 positive, 26 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

mycorrhiza · molecular: expression · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.