Abstract
It was evident from the interaction study that AM fungus (Glomus fasciculatum) inoculated ten days prior to root knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) resulted significant increase in shoot length (21.5%), root length (29.4%), fresh shoot weight (47.8%), fresh root weight (23.0%), dry shoot weight (73.2%), dry root weight (73.9%), number of branches (44.7%), root volume (34.4%) and phosphorus content of plants (55.5%) over uninoculated check followed by the treatment receiving simultaneous inoculation of G. fasciculatum and M. incognita. G. fasciculatum inoculated simultaneously as well as ten days prior to M. incognita exhibiting increased root colonization (39.0% & 61.0%) and multiplication of chlamydospore (8.4 & 10.8) with reduced reproductive growth of M. incognita (0.77 & 0.26) and number of root galls (12.50 & 5.25), respectively in tomato considered G. fasciculatum as potential nematode inhibitor. Hence, reciprocal interrelationship was noticed between M. incognita and G. fasciculatum depending on the early establishment of either M. incognita or G. fasciculatum in tomato root.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 18
Claim · model-written summary
Prior Glomus fasciculatum inoculation significantly increased tomato shoot length by 21.5% over the uninoculated check.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- Glomus fasciculatum) inoculated ten days prior to root knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognitae0
- Interactor
- Glomus fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
- Second interactor
- Meloidogyne incognita
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=60)
Meloidogyne incognitae0pathogen - Outcome
- shoot lengthe0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 21.5%e0
- Comparator
- uninoculated checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“AM fungus (Glomus fasciculatum) inoculated ten days prior to root knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) resulted significant increase in shoot length (21.5%), root length (29.4%), fresh shoot weight (47.8%), fresh root weight (23.0%), dry shoot weight (73.2%), dry root weight (73.9%), number of branches (44.7%), root volume (34.4%) and phosphorus content of plants (55.5%) over uninoculated check followed by the treatment receiving simultaneous inoculation of G. fasciculatum and M. incognita.”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Prior Glomus fasciculatum inoculation significantly increased tomato root length by 29.4% over the uninoculated check.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Glomus fasciculatum) inoculated ten days prior to root knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognitae0
- Interactor
- Glomus fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
- Second interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
- Outcome
- root lengthe0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 29.4%e0
- Comparator
- uninoculated checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“AM fungus (Glomus fasciculatum) inoculated ten days prior to root knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) resulted significant increase in shoot length (21.5%), root length (29.4%), fresh shoot weight (47.8%), fresh root weight (23.0%), dry shoot weight (73.2%), dry root weight (73.9%), number of branches (44.7%), root volume (34.4%) and phosphorus content of plants (55.5%) over uninoculated check followed by the treatment receiving simultaneous inoculation of G. fasciculatum and M. incognita.”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Prior Glomus fasciculatum inoculation significantly increased tomato fresh shoot weight by 47.8% over the uninoculated check.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Glomus fasciculatum) inoculated ten days prior to root knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognitae0
- Interactor
- Glomus fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
- Second interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
- Outcome
- fresh shoot weighte0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 47.8%e0
- Comparator
- uninoculated checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“AM fungus (Glomus fasciculatum) inoculated ten days prior to root knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) resulted significant increase in shoot length (21.5%), root length (29.4%), fresh shoot weight (47.8%), fresh root weight (23.0%), dry shoot weight (73.2%), dry root weight (73.9%), number of branches (44.7%), root volume (34.4%) and phosphorus content of plants (55.5%) over uninoculated check followed by the treatment receiving simultaneous inoculation of G. fasciculatum and M. incognita.”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Prior Glomus fasciculatum inoculation significantly increased tomato fresh root weight by 23.0% over the uninoculated check.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Glomus fasciculatum) inoculated ten days prior to root knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognitae0
- Interactor
- Glomus fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
- Second interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
- Outcome
- fresh root weighte0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 23.0%e0
- Comparator
- uninoculated checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“AM fungus (Glomus fasciculatum) inoculated ten days prior to root knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) resulted significant increase in shoot length (21.5%), root length (29.4%), fresh shoot weight (47.8%), fresh root weight (23.0%), dry shoot weight (73.2%), dry root weight (73.9%), number of branches (44.7%), root volume (34.4%) and phosphorus content of plants (55.5%) over uninoculated check followed by the treatment receiving simultaneous inoculation of G. fasciculatum and M. incognita.”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Prior Glomus fasciculatum inoculation significantly increased tomato dry shoot weight by 73.2% over the uninoculated check.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Glomus fasciculatum) inoculated ten days prior to root knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognitae0
- Interactor
- Glomus fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
- Second interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
- Outcome
- dry shoot weighte0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 73.2%e0
- Comparator
- uninoculated checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“AM fungus (Glomus fasciculatum) inoculated ten days prior to root knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) resulted significant increase in shoot length (21.5%), root length (29.4%), fresh shoot weight (47.8%), fresh root weight (23.0%), dry shoot weight (73.2%), dry root weight (73.9%), number of branches (44.7%), root volume (34.4%) and phosphorus content of plants (55.5%) over uninoculated check followed by the treatment receiving simultaneous inoculation of G. fasciculatum and M. incognita.”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Prior Glomus fasciculatum inoculation significantly increased tomato dry root weight by 73.9% over the uninoculated check.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Glomus fasciculatum) inoculated ten days prior to root knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognitae0
- Interactor
- Glomus fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
- Second interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
- Outcome
- dry root weighte0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 73.9%e0
- Comparator
- uninoculated checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“AM fungus (Glomus fasciculatum) inoculated ten days prior to root knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) resulted significant increase in shoot length (21.5%), root length (29.4%), fresh shoot weight (47.8%), fresh root weight (23.0%), dry shoot weight (73.2%), dry root weight (73.9%), number of branches (44.7%), root volume (34.4%) and phosphorus content of plants (55.5%) over uninoculated check followed by the treatment receiving simultaneous inoculation of G. fasciculatum and M. incognita.”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Prior Glomus fasciculatum inoculation significantly increased tomato number of branches by 44.7% over the uninoculated check.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Glomus fasciculatum) inoculated ten days prior to root knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognitae0
- Interactor
- Glomus fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
- Second interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
- Outcome
- number of branchese0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 44.7%e0
- Comparator
- uninoculated checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“AM fungus (Glomus fasciculatum) inoculated ten days prior to root knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) resulted significant increase in shoot length (21.5%), root length (29.4%), fresh shoot weight (47.8%), fresh root weight (23.0%), dry shoot weight (73.2%), dry root weight (73.9%), number of branches (44.7%), root volume (34.4%) and phosphorus content of plants (55.5%) over uninoculated check followed by the treatment receiving simultaneous inoculation of G. fasciculatum and M. incognita.”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Prior Glomus fasciculatum inoculation significantly increased tomato root volume by 34.4% over the uninoculated check.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Glomus fasciculatum) inoculated ten days prior to root knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognitae0
- Interactor
- Glomus fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
- Second interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
- Outcome
- root volumee0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 34.4%e0
- Comparator
- uninoculated checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“AM fungus (Glomus fasciculatum) inoculated ten days prior to root knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) resulted significant increase in shoot length (21.5%), root length (29.4%), fresh shoot weight (47.8%), fresh root weight (23.0%), dry shoot weight (73.2%), dry root weight (73.9%), number of branches (44.7%), root volume (34.4%) and phosphorus content of plants (55.5%) over uninoculated check followed by the treatment receiving simultaneous inoculation of G. fasciculatum and M. incognita.”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Prior Glomus fasciculatum inoculation significantly increased tomato phosphorus content of plants by 55.5% over the uninoculated check.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Glomus fasciculatum) inoculated ten days prior to root knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognitae0
- Interactor
- Glomus fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
- Second interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
- Outcome
- phosphorus content of plantse0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 55.5%e0
- Comparator
- uninoculated checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“AM fungus (Glomus fasciculatum) inoculated ten days prior to root knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) resulted significant increase in shoot length (21.5%), root length (29.4%), fresh shoot weight (47.8%), fresh root weight (23.0%), dry shoot weight (73.2%), dry root weight (73.9%), number of branches (44.7%), root volume (34.4%) and phosphorus content of plants (55.5%) over uninoculated check followed by the treatment receiving simultaneous inoculation of G. fasciculatum and M. incognita.”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
With G. fasciculatum inoculated simultaneously, tomato showed increased root colonization (39.0%).
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- G. fasciculatum inoculated simultaneouslye0
- Interactor
- M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
- Second interactor
- G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
- Outcome
- root colonizatione0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 39.0%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“G. fasciculatum inoculated simultaneously as well as ten days prior to M. incognita exhibiting increased root colonization (39.0% & 61.0%) and multiplication of chlamydospore (8.4 & 10.8) with reduced reproductive growth of M. incognita (0.77 & 0.26) and number of root galls (12.50 & 5.25), respectively in tomato considered G. fasciculatum as potential nematode inhibitor.”
Claim · model-written summary
With G. fasciculatum inoculated simultaneously, tomato showed increased multiplication of chlamydospore (8.4).
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- G. fasciculatum inoculated simultaneouslye0
- Interactor
- M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
- Second interactor
- G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
- Outcome
- multiplication of chlamydosporee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 8.4e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“G. fasciculatum inoculated simultaneously as well as ten days prior to M. incognita exhibiting increased root colonization (39.0% & 61.0%) and multiplication of chlamydospore (8.4 & 10.8) with reduced reproductive growth of M. incognita (0.77 & 0.26) and number of root galls (12.50 & 5.25), respectively in tomato considered G. fasciculatum as potential nematode inhibitor.”
Claim · model-written summary
With G. fasciculatum inoculated simultaneously, tomato showed reduced reproductive growth of M. incognita (0.77).
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- G. fasciculatum inoculated simultaneouslye0
- Interactor
- M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
- Second interactor
- G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
- Outcome
- reproductive growth of M. incognitae0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 0.77e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“G. fasciculatum inoculated simultaneously as well as ten days prior to M. incognita exhibiting increased root colonization (39.0% & 61.0%) and multiplication of chlamydospore (8.4 & 10.8) with reduced reproductive growth of M. incognita (0.77 & 0.26) and number of root galls (12.50 & 5.25), respectively in tomato considered G. fasciculatum as potential nematode inhibitor.”
Claim · model-written summary
With G. fasciculatum inoculated simultaneously, tomato showed reduced number of root galls (12.50).
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- G. fasciculatum inoculated simultaneouslye0
- Interactor
- M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
- Second interactor
- G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
- Outcome
- number of root gallse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 12.50e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“G. fasciculatum inoculated simultaneously as well as ten days prior to M. incognita exhibiting increased root colonization (39.0% & 61.0%) and multiplication of chlamydospore (8.4 & 10.8) with reduced reproductive growth of M. incognita (0.77 & 0.26) and number of root galls (12.50 & 5.25), respectively in tomato considered G. fasciculatum as potential nematode inhibitor.”
Claim · model-written summary
With G. fasciculatum inoculated ten days prior, tomato showed increased root colonization (61.0%).
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- ten days prior to M. incognitae0
- Interactor
- M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
- Second interactor
- G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
- Outcome
- root colonizatione0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 61.0%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“G. fasciculatum inoculated simultaneously as well as ten days prior to M. incognita exhibiting increased root colonization (39.0% & 61.0%) and multiplication of chlamydospore (8.4 & 10.8) with reduced reproductive growth of M. incognita (0.77 & 0.26) and number of root galls (12.50 & 5.25), respectively in tomato considered G. fasciculatum as potential nematode inhibitor.”
Claim · model-written summary
With G. fasciculatum inoculated ten days prior, tomato showed increased multiplication of chlamydospore (10.8).
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- ten days prior to M. incognitae0
- Interactor
- M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
- Second interactor
- G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
- Outcome
- multiplication of chlamydosporee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 10.8e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“G. fasciculatum inoculated simultaneously as well as ten days prior to M. incognita exhibiting increased root colonization (39.0% & 61.0%) and multiplication of chlamydospore (8.4 & 10.8) with reduced reproductive growth of M. incognita (0.77 & 0.26) and number of root galls (12.50 & 5.25), respectively in tomato considered G. fasciculatum as potential nematode inhibitor.”
Claim · model-written summary
With G. fasciculatum inoculated ten days prior, tomato showed reduced reproductive growth of M. incognita (0.26).
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- ten days prior to M. incognitae0
- Interactor
- M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
- Second interactor
- G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
- Outcome
- reproductive growth of M. incognitae0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 0.26e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“G. fasciculatum inoculated simultaneously as well as ten days prior to M. incognita exhibiting increased root colonization (39.0% & 61.0%) and multiplication of chlamydospore (8.4 & 10.8) with reduced reproductive growth of M. incognita (0.77 & 0.26) and number of root galls (12.50 & 5.25), respectively in tomato considered G. fasciculatum as potential nematode inhibitor.”
Claim · model-written summary
With G. fasciculatum inoculated ten days prior, tomato showed reduced number of root galls (5.25).
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- ten days prior to M. incognitae0
- Interactor
- M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
- Second interactor
- G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
- Outcome
- number of root gallse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 5.25e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“G. fasciculatum inoculated simultaneously as well as ten days prior to M. incognita exhibiting increased root colonization (39.0% & 61.0%) and multiplication of chlamydospore (8.4 & 10.8) with reduced reproductive growth of M. incognita (0.77 & 0.26) and number of root galls (12.50 & 5.25), respectively in tomato considered G. fasciculatum as potential nematode inhibitor.”
Claim · model-written summary
The interaction of M. incognita and G. fasciculatum in tomato roots depended on which organism established first.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Interactor
- M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
- Second interactor
- G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
- Outcome
- reciprocal interrelationshipe0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“reciprocal interrelationship was noticed between M. incognita and G. fasciculatum depending on the early establishment of either M. incognita or G. fasciculatum in tomato root.”
The same questions in other papers
Meloidogyne javanica · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
Meloidogyne incognita · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Meloidogyne javanica · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Rhizophagus fasciculatus · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Meloidogyne incognita · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →Rhizophagus fasciculatus · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Rhizophagus fasciculatus · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →inoculation · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
83 papers more in this group
See all 87 papers →8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.