Paper · 2010 · Biocontrol Science and Technology

Biological control of root-knot nematode,Meloidogyne incognitainfesting tomato

Satyandra Singh; Nita Mathur

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Talc based formulations of two antagonistic fungi, Acremonium strictum W. Gams and Aspergillus terreus Thom were tested separately and together for their ability to suppress the development of root-knot disease of tomato caused by the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita Kofoid & White in two consecutive trials (2007–08). Tomato seedlings were each inoculated with M. incognita at 2 infective second stage juveniles /g of soil. M. incognita caused up to 48% reduction in plant growth parameters compared to un-inoculated control. Control efficacy achieved by combined soil application of both fungi, in terms of galls/root system and soil population/50 ml of soil, was 66 and 69% respectively at 60 days of inoculation compared to control. Soil application by individual fungus did not achieve as much effectiveness as the biocontrol agents applied together. The combined treatment was found to have antagonistic effect on M. incognita development and increased plant vigor. Incorporation of fine powder of chickpea pod waste with talc powder was beneficial in providing additional nutrients to both plant and biocontrol agents and increased the activity of the nematophagous fungi in soil. A. strictum and A. terreus were successfully established in the rhizosphere of tomato plants up to the termination of the experiment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M. incognita reduced tomato plant growth parameters by up to 48% relative to un-inoculated control.

Treatment
M. incognitae0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
plant growth parameterse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
up to 48%e0
Comparator
un-inoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“M. incognita caused up to 48% reduction in plant growth parameters compared to un-inoculated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–545 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined soil application of both fungi achieved 66% control efficacy for galls per root system at 60 days versus control.

Treatment
combined soil application of both fungie0
Outcome
galls/root systeme0
Value
66e0
Qualifier
at 60 days of inoculatione0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Control efficacy achieved by combined soil application of both fungi, in terms of galls/root system and soil population/50 ml of soil, was 66 and 69% respectively at 60 days of inoculation compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–755 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined soil application of both fungi achieved 69% control efficacy for nematode soil population at 60 days versus control.

Treatment
combined soil application of both fungie0
Outcome
soil population/50 ml of soile0
Value
69%e0
Qualifier
at 60 days of inoculatione0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Control efficacy achieved by combined soil application of both fungi, in terms of galls/root system and soil population/50 ml of soil, was 66 and 69% respectively at 60 days of inoculation compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–755 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Individual fungal soil application was less effective than the combined application.

Treatment
biocontrol agents applied togethere0
Outcome
effectivenesse0
Direction
did not achieve as muche0
Comparator
individual funguse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil application by individual fungus did not achieve as much effectiveness as the biocontrol agents applied together.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–874 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment antagonized M. incognita development.

Treatment
combined treatmente0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
M. incognita developmente0
Direction
antagonistic effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined treatment was found to have antagonistic effect on M. incognita development and increased plant vigor.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–990 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment increased tomato vigor.

Treatment
combined treatmente0
Outcome
plant vigore0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined treatment was found to have antagonistic effect on M. incognita development and increased plant vigor.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–990 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea pod waste in talc powder supplied additional nutrients to plant and biocontrol agents.

Treatment
Incorporation of fine powder of chickpea pod waste with talc powdere0
Outcome
additional nutrients to both plant and biocontrol agentse0
Direction
providinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Incorporation of fine powder of chickpea pod waste with talc powder was beneficial in providing additional nutrients to both plant and biocontrol agents and increased the activity of the nematophagous fungi in soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1206 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea pod waste in talc powder increased nematophagous fungal activity in soil.

Treatment
Incorporation of fine powder of chickpea pod waste with talc powdere0
Outcome
activity of the nematophagous fungi in soile0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Incorporation of fine powder of chickpea pod waste with talc powder was beneficial in providing additional nutrients to both plant and biocontrol agents and increased the activity of the nematophagous fungi in soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1206 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. strictum established in the tomato rhizosphere through the end of the experiment.

Interactor
A. strictumSarocladium strictume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
successfully established in the rhizosphere of tomato plantse0
Qualifier
up to the termination of the experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sarocladium strictum
Sarocladium strictum · InteractorCui Y, Meng J, Zhang J, Wang L, Yan H, Xia H, Cao J and Wu L · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A. strictum and A. terreus were successfully established in the rhizosphere of tomato plants up to the termination of the experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1340 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. terreus established in the tomato rhizosphere through the end of the experiment.

Interactor
A. terreusAspergillus terreuse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
successfully established in the rhizosphere of tomato plantse0
Qualifier
up to the termination of the experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus terreus
Aspergillus terreus · InteractorMedmyco at English Wikipedia · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A. strictum and A. terreus were successfully established in the rhizosphere of tomato plants up to the termination of the experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1340 · show in text ↑

Meloidogyne incognita · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 4 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

botanical · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 15 positive, 3 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

application · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 34 positive, 9 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.