Paper · 1996 · Biocontrol Science and Technology

The Importance of the Host Plant on the Interaction Between Root-knot Nematodes Meloidogyne spp. and the Nematophagous Fungus, Verticillium chlamydosporium Goddard

J. M. BOURNE; B. R. KERRY; F. A. A. M. DE LEIJ

10
claims
13
verbatim quotes
117
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of the host plant on the efficacy of Verticillium chlamydosporium as a biological control agent for root-knot nematodes was investigated in four experiments. The growth of the fungus in the rhizosphere differed significantly with different plant species, the brassicas kale and cabbage supporting the most extensive colonization. The presence of nematodes in roots increased the growth of the fungus on most plants, and this effect was associated with the emergence of egg masses on the root surface; the presence of Meloidogyne incognita did not stimulate growth of the fungus in the rhizosphere until 5 weeks after the addition of infective juveniles to soil. The susceptibility of the plant host to M. incognita attack influenced the numbers of nematode eggs parasitized by the fungus. The control of the nematode was less effective on tomato roots, which produced large galls as a result of nematode infection compared with control on potato roots where galls were smaller, despite the greater abundance of the fungus in the rhizosphere of tomato plants. In large galls, a significant proportion of the egg masses remained embedded in the roots and was isolated from the fungus which was confined to the rhizosphere. Hence, the plant species has a marked effect on the efficacy of V. chlamydosporium as a biological control agent. Keywords: Biological ControlMeloidogyne IncognitaVerticillium ChlamydosporiumRoot-knot NematodesRhizosphere Colonization

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal rhizosphere growth differed significantly among plants, with kale and cabbage most extensively colonized.

Material
brassicas kale and cabbagee0
Outcome
growth of the fungus in the rhizospheree0
Direction
most extensivee0
Setting
rhizospheree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth of the fungus in the rhizosphere differed significantly with different plant species, the brassicas kale and cabbage supporting the most extensive colonization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–339 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode presence in roots increased fungal growth on most plants.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
presence of nematodes in rootse0
Outcome
growth of the funguse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The presence of nematodes in roots increased the growth of the fungus on most plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–425 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungal growth response was associated with egg masses emerging on the root surface.

Taxon
host plantt0
Organ / stage
root surfacee0
Outcome
emergence of egg masses on the root surfacee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“this effect was associated with the emergence of egg masses on the root surface”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–510 · show in text ↑
t0

“Host Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M. incognita did not stimulate rhizosphere fungal growth until five weeks after inoculation.

Taxon
host plantt0
Treatment
presence of Meloidogyne incognitae0
Outcome
growth of the fungus in the rhizospheree0
Direction
did not stimulatee0
Qualifier
until 5 weeks after the addition of infective juveniles to soile0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the presence of Meloidogyne incognita did not stimulate growth of the fungus in the rhizosphere until 5 weeks after the addition of infective juveniles to soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–671 · show in text ↑
t0

“Host Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–32 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant susceptibility influenced the number of nematode eggs parasitized by the fungus.

Taxon
plant hoste0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
numbers of nematode eggs parasitized by the funguse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The susceptibility of the plant host to M. incognita attack influenced the numbers of nematode eggs parasitized by the fungus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–798 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode control was less effective on tomato than potato roots.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
control of the nematodee0
Direction
less effectivee0
Comparator
potato rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The control of the nematode was less effective on tomato roots, which produced large galls as a result of nematode infection compared with control on potato roots where galls were smaller”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–987 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato roots produced larger galls than potato roots.

Outcome
gallse0
Direction
largee0
Comparator
potato rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato roots, which produced large galls as a result of nematode infection compared with control on potato roots where galls were smaller”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–987 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal abundance in the tomato rhizosphere exceeded that of potato.

Outcome
abundance of the fungus in the rhizospheree0
Direction
greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“despite the greater abundance of the fungus in the rhizosphere of tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1068 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Egg masses embedded in large galls were isolated from rhizosphere fungus.

Taxon
plant hoste1
Outcome
egg masses remained embedded in the roots and was isolated from the funguse0
Qualifier
fungus which was confined to the rhizospheree0

Verbatim

e0

“In large galls, a significant proportion of the egg masses remained embedded in the roots and was isolated from the fungus which was confined to the rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1230 · show in text ↑
e1

“The susceptibility of the plant host to M. incognita attack”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–732 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant species markedly affects V. chlamydosporium biocontrol efficacy.

Taxon
plant speciese0
Interactor
V. chlamydosporiumPochonia chlamydosporiae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
efficacy of V. chlamydosporium as a biological control agente0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the plant species has a marked effect on the efficacy of V. chlamydosporium as a biological control agent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1344 · show in text ↑

Meloidogyne incognita · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 4 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.