Abstract
A field experiment was conducted in Padang Besar, Perlis, Malaysia from 15/2/2014 and 15/2/2015 two seasons. In each year, the experiments have been implemented in order to study the effect of three levels of irrigation water (25% (no stress), 50% (moderate deficit), 75% (water deficit) of field capacity), and five concentrations of GA3(0, 50, 100, 200, 300 ppm) and five concentrations of proline (0, 100, 200, 300, 400 ppm) on the yield and productivity of maize.The results showed a significant influence of sprayed GA3on the maize leaves, where excellence sprayed 300ppm GA3 with a high rate of all the study characteristics with sprayed 300ppm of gibberellic acid except cobs per plant. The results of the interaction between GA3and water deficit showed the clear influence of water deficit in reducing all characteristics of study where excelled the interactions (300ppm GA3 and 25% from field capacity) with a high rate of majority study characteristics, but these increases were not sufficient. Concluded from the results of the study great positive impact of sprayed proline on the all of the growth characteristics, it characterizes the concentration of 400ppm with the highest rate of majority study characteristics. The study results showed into increased the rate of protein, chlorophyll content, and oil, with sprayed 400ppm of proline.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Spraying 300 ppm GA3 gave a high rate of all study characteristics of maize, except cobs per plant.
- Treatment
- sprayed 300ppm GA3e0
- Outcome
- all the study characteristicse0
- Direction
- high ratee0
- Qualifier
- except cobs per plante0
- Setting
- Padang Besar, Perlis, Malaysiae1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“excellence sprayed 300ppm GA3 with a high rate of all the study characteristics with sprayed 300ppm of gibberellic acid except cobs per plant”
e1“A field experiment was conducted in Padang Besar, Perlis, Malaysia”
e2“yield and productivity of maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit reduced all study characteristics of maize.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e2“yield and productivity of maize”
e3“showed the clear influence of water deficit in reducing all characteristics of study”
Claim · model-written summary
The interaction of 300 ppm GA3 with 25% of field capacity gave a high rate in the majority of study characteristics of maize, but these increases were not sufficient.
- Treatment
- 300ppm GA3 and 25% from field capacitye4
- Outcome
- majority study characteristicse4
- Direction
- high ratee4
- Qualifier
- but these increases were not sufficiente4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e2“yield and productivity of maize”
e4“excelled the interactions (300ppm GA3 and 25% from field capacity) with a high rate of majority study characteristics, but these increases were not sufficient”
Claim · model-written summary
Sprayed proline had a great positive impact on all growth characteristics of maize.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e2“yield and productivity of maize”
e5“great positive impact of sprayed proline on the all of the growth characteristics”
Claim · model-written summary
The 400 ppm proline concentration gave the highest rate in the majority of study characteristics of maize.
- Treatment
- sprayed prolinee5
- Outcome
- majority study characteristicse6
- Direction
- highest ratee6
- Qualifier
- concentration of 400ppme6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e2“yield and productivity of maize”
e5“great positive impact of sprayed proline on the all of the growth characteristics”
e6“it characterizes the concentration of 400ppm with the highest rate of majority study characteristics”
Claim · model-written summary
Sprayed 400 ppm proline increased the rate of protein, chlorophyll content and oil in maize.
- Treatment
- sprayed 400ppm of prolinee7
- Outcome
- rate of protein, chlorophyll content, and oile7
- Direction
- increasede7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e2“yield and productivity of maize”
e7“showed into increased the rate of protein, chlorophyll content, and oil, with sprayed 400ppm of proline”
The same questions in other papers
proline · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
12 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →proline · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →application · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
83 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
85 papers more in this group
See all 89 papers →application · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
309 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
333 papers more in this group
See all 337 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.