Paper · 2016 · Journal of Plant and Environmental Research

The interactive effect of the water deficiency, gibberellic acid and proline on the growth of maize

E Gustafson; B Sturtevant; A Van Loon; et al.

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted in Padang Besar, Perlis, Malaysia from 15/2/2014 and 15/2/2015 two seasons. In each year, the experiments have been implemented in order to study the effect of three levels of irrigation water (25% (no stress), 50% (moderate deficit), 75% (water deficit) of field capacity), and five concentrations of GA3(0, 50, 100, 200, 300 ppm) and five concentrations of proline (0, 100, 200, 300, 400 ppm) on the yield and productivity of maize.The results showed a significant influence of sprayed GA3on the maize leaves, where excellence sprayed 300ppm GA3 with a high rate of all the study characteristics with sprayed 300ppm of gibberellic acid except cobs per plant. The results of the interaction between GA3and water deficit showed the clear influence of water deficit in reducing all characteristics of study where excelled the interactions (300ppm GA3 and 25% from field capacity) with a high rate of majority study characteristics, but these increases were not sufficient. Concluded from the results of the study great positive impact of sprayed proline on the all of the growth characteristics, it characterizes the concentration of 400ppm with the highest rate of majority study characteristics. The study results showed into increased the rate of protein, chlorophyll content, and oil, with sprayed 400ppm of proline.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying 300 ppm GA3 gave a high rate of all study characteristics of maize, except cobs per plant.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
sprayed 300ppm GA3e0
Outcome
all the study characteristicse0
Direction
high ratee0
Qualifier
except cobs per plante0
Setting
Padang Besar, Perlis, Malaysiae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“excellence sprayed 300ppm GA3 with a high rate of all the study characteristics with sprayed 300ppm of gibberellic acid except cobs per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–692 · show in text ↑
e1

“A field experiment was conducted in Padang Besar, Perlis, Malaysia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e2

“yield and productivity of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–466 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit reduced all study characteristics of maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
water deficite3
Outcome
all characteristics of studye3
Direction
reducinge3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“yield and productivity of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–466 · show in text ↑
e3

“showed the clear influence of water deficit in reducing all characteristics of study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–838 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of 300 ppm GA3 with 25% of field capacity gave a high rate in the majority of study characteristics of maize, but these increases were not sufficient.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
300ppm GA3 and 25% from field capacitye4
Outcome
majority study characteristicse4
Direction
high ratee4
Qualifier
but these increases were not sufficiente4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“yield and productivity of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–466 · show in text ↑
e4

“excelled the interactions (300ppm GA3 and 25% from field capacity) with a high rate of majority study characteristics, but these increases were not sufficient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–1003 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprayed proline had a great positive impact on all growth characteristics of maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
sprayed prolinee5
Outcome
all of the growth characteristicse5
Direction
positive impacte5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“yield and productivity of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–466 · show in text ↑
e5

“great positive impact of sprayed proline on the all of the growth characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 400 ppm proline concentration gave the highest rate in the majority of study characteristics of maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
sprayed prolinee5
Outcome
majority study characteristicse6
Direction
highest ratee6
Qualifier
concentration of 400ppme6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“yield and productivity of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–466 · show in text ↑
e5

“great positive impact of sprayed proline on the all of the growth characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1126 · show in text ↑
e6

“it characterizes the concentration of 400ppm with the highest rate of majority study characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprayed 400 ppm proline increased the rate of protein, chlorophyll content and oil in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
sprayed 400ppm of prolinee7
Outcome
rate of protein, chlorophyll content, and oile7
Direction
increasede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“yield and productivity of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–466 · show in text ↑
e7

“showed into increased the rate of protein, chlorophyll content, and oil, with sprayed 400ppm of proline”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1351 · show in text ↑

proline · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

proline · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

89 papers: 84 positive, 5 negative or no effect

83 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

application · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

337 papers: 310 positive, 27 negative or no effect

309 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

333 papers more in this group

See all 337 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.