Abstract
The purpose of this research was to study the impact of N levels applied with proline as well as plant distance on the vegetative growth, chemical content, yield, yield components, and quality attributes of maize under different irrigation intervals. The research was undertaken at an experimental field of Agricultural Faculty, El-Mansoura University during 2018-2019. The results showed that application of 150% nitrogen fertilization from recommended dose in presence of 50 mg/l proline significantly increased growth parameters (plant length, fresh and dry weight of flag, leaves area), chlorophyll content, N, P, K and proline content of maize leaves as well as yield attributed (ear length, 1000-graine weight, grain yield and straw yield) and quality of grains (crude proline, fiber, total carbohydrates and oil%). All parameters under investigation recorded high significant values with plant spacing 15 cm. As for irrigation intervals the results revealed that 11 days' intervals were the most suitable for previous maize parameters. So, it could be recommended touse150 N-fertilization in presence of proline + 15 cm plant spacing and 11 days' irrigation intervals.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen fertilization at 150% of the recommended dose with 50 mg/l proline significantly increased maize growth parameters.
- Treatment
- application of 150% nitrogen fertilization from recommended dose in presence of 50 mg/l prolinee1
- Outcome
- growth parameterse1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Qualifier
- plant length, fresh and dry weight of flag, leaves areae1
- Comparator
- recommended dosee1
- Setting
- experimental field of Agricultural Faculty, El-Mansoura Universitye6
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of Nitrogen Fertilization, Proline, Plant Spacing and Irrigation Intervals on Growth of Maize Plant”
e1“application of 150% nitrogen fertilization from recommended dose in presence of 50 mg/l proline significantly increased growth parameters (plant length, fresh and dry weight of flag, leaves area), chlorophyll content, N, P, K and proline content of maize leaves as well as yield attributed (ear length, 1000-graine weight, grain yield and straw yield)”
e6“The research was undertaken at an experimental field of Agricultural Faculty, El-Mansoura University during 2018-2019”
Claim · model-written summary
The same treatment significantly increased chlorophyll content of maize leaves.
- Treatment
- application of 150% nitrogen fertilization from recommended dose in presence of 50 mg/l prolinee1
- Outcome
- chlorophyll contente1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Comparator
- recommended dosee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of Nitrogen Fertilization, Proline, Plant Spacing and Irrigation Intervals on Growth of Maize Plant”
e1“application of 150% nitrogen fertilization from recommended dose in presence of 50 mg/l proline significantly increased growth parameters (plant length, fresh and dry weight of flag, leaves area), chlorophyll content, N, P, K and proline content of maize leaves as well as yield attributed (ear length, 1000-graine weight, grain yield and straw yield)”
Claim · model-written summary
The same treatment significantly increased N, P and K contents of maize leaves.
- Treatment
- application of 150% nitrogen fertilization from recommended dose in presence of 50 mg/l prolinee1
- Outcome
- N, P, Ke1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Comparator
- recommended dosee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of Nitrogen Fertilization, Proline, Plant Spacing and Irrigation Intervals on Growth of Maize Plant”
e1“application of 150% nitrogen fertilization from recommended dose in presence of 50 mg/l proline significantly increased growth parameters (plant length, fresh and dry weight of flag, leaves area), chlorophyll content, N, P, K and proline content of maize leaves as well as yield attributed (ear length, 1000-graine weight, grain yield and straw yield)”
Claim · model-written summary
The same treatment significantly increased proline content of maize leaves.
- Treatment
- application of 150% nitrogen fertilization from recommended dose in presence of 50 mg/l prolinee1
- Outcome
- proline contente1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Comparator
- recommended dosee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of Nitrogen Fertilization, Proline, Plant Spacing and Irrigation Intervals on Growth of Maize Plant”
e1“application of 150% nitrogen fertilization from recommended dose in presence of 50 mg/l proline significantly increased growth parameters (plant length, fresh and dry weight of flag, leaves area), chlorophyll content, N, P, K and proline content of maize leaves as well as yield attributed (ear length, 1000-graine weight, grain yield and straw yield)”
Claim · model-written summary
The same treatment significantly increased ear length, 1000-grain weight and grain yield.
- Treatment
- application of 150% nitrogen fertilization from recommended dose in presence of 50 mg/l prolinee1
- Outcome
- ear length, 1000-graine weight, grain yielde1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Comparator
- recommended dosee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of Nitrogen Fertilization, Proline, Plant Spacing and Irrigation Intervals on Growth of Maize Plant”
e1“application of 150% nitrogen fertilization from recommended dose in presence of 50 mg/l proline significantly increased growth parameters (plant length, fresh and dry weight of flag, leaves area), chlorophyll content, N, P, K and proline content of maize leaves as well as yield attributed (ear length, 1000-graine weight, grain yield and straw yield)”
Claim · model-written summary
The same treatment significantly increased straw yield.
- Treatment
- application of 150% nitrogen fertilization from recommended dose in presence of 50 mg/l prolinee1
- Outcome
- straw yielde1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Comparator
- recommended dosee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of Nitrogen Fertilization, Proline, Plant Spacing and Irrigation Intervals on Growth of Maize Plant”
e1“application of 150% nitrogen fertilization from recommended dose in presence of 50 mg/l proline significantly increased growth parameters (plant length, fresh and dry weight of flag, leaves area), chlorophyll content, N, P, K and proline content of maize leaves as well as yield attributed (ear length, 1000-graine weight, grain yield and straw yield)”
Claim · model-written summary
The same treatment significantly increased crude proline, fiber and total carbohydrate contents of maize grain.
- Treatment
- application of 150% nitrogen fertilization from recommended dose in presence of 50 mg/l prolinee1
- Outcome
- crude proline, fiber, total carbohydratese2
- Direction
- increasede1
- Comparator
- recommended dosee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of Nitrogen Fertilization, Proline, Plant Spacing and Irrigation Intervals on Growth of Maize Plant”
e1“application of 150% nitrogen fertilization from recommended dose in presence of 50 mg/l proline significantly increased growth parameters (plant length, fresh and dry weight of flag, leaves area), chlorophyll content, N, P, K and proline content of maize leaves as well as yield attributed (ear length, 1000-graine weight, grain yield and straw yield)”
e2“quality of grains (crude proline, fiber, total carbohydrates and oil%)”
Claim · model-written summary
The same treatment significantly increased oil percentage of maize grain.
- Treatment
- application of 150% nitrogen fertilization from recommended dose in presence of 50 mg/l prolinee1
- Outcome
- oil%e2
- Direction
- increasede1
- Comparator
- recommended dosee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of Nitrogen Fertilization, Proline, Plant Spacing and Irrigation Intervals on Growth of Maize Plant”
e1“application of 150% nitrogen fertilization from recommended dose in presence of 50 mg/l proline significantly increased growth parameters (plant length, fresh and dry weight of flag, leaves area), chlorophyll content, N, P, K and proline content of maize leaves as well as yield attributed (ear length, 1000-graine weight, grain yield and straw yield)”
e2“quality of grains (crude proline, fiber, total carbohydrates and oil%)”
Claim · model-written summary
All parameters were highly significant with 15 cm plant spacing.
- Treatment
- plant spacing 15 cme3
- Outcome
- parameters under investigatione3
- Direction
- high significant valuese3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of Nitrogen Fertilization, Proline, Plant Spacing and Irrigation Intervals on Growth of Maize Plant”
e3“All parameters under investigation recorded high significant values with plant spacing 15 cm”
Claim · model-written summary
An 11-day irrigation interval was the most suitable for the maize parameters.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of Nitrogen Fertilization, Proline, Plant Spacing and Irrigation Intervals on Growth of Maize Plant”
e4“As for irrigation intervals the results revealed that 11 days' intervals were the most suitable for previous maize parameters”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend 150% N-fertilization with proline, 15 cm plant spacing and 11-day irrigation intervals for maize.
- Outcome
- N-fertilization in presence of prolinee5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of Nitrogen Fertilization, Proline, Plant Spacing and Irrigation Intervals on Growth of Maize Plant”
e5“it could be recommended touse150 N-fertilization in presence of proline + 15 cm plant spacing and 11 days' irrigation intervals”
The same questions in other papers
proline · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
12 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →proline · physiology: osmolytes · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
proline · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
proline · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →proline · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →fertilization · physiology: osmolytes · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →fertilization · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
156 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
167 papers more in this group
See all 171 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1,025 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
1,160 papers more in this group
See all 1,164 papers →8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.