Paper · 2018 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Planting methods and weed management to improve yield in dry-seeded rice

R.I. Yadav; M.K. Singh; Ram Kumar Singh; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of planting methods and weed management in direct dry-seeded rice during summer season of 2012 and 2013 at Agricultural Research Farm, Institute of Agricultural Sciences Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi (Uttar Pradesh). The treatment comprised of five rice planting treatments, viz. conventional tillage normal spacing [row to row (R x R)-18 cm], conventional tillage square planting (RxR-20 cm, plant to plant (P x P)-20 cm), conventional tillage paired row (9-27-9 cm), reduced tillage paired row (9-27-9 cm), reduced tillage square planting (R x R-20 cm, PxP-20 cm) in main plot and sub-plot consisted of four weed management treatments, viz. weedy, two hand weeding, pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha fb azimsulfuron 17.5 g/ha + bispyribac 25 g/ha (tank mixed) at 15 DAS fb one hand weeding (HW), oxadiargyl 50 g/ha fb metsulfuron-methyl 2 g/ha + chlorimuron-ethyl 2 g/ha (ready mix) at 20 DAS fb 1 HW. Significant reduction in weed density and biomass was recorded in two hand weeding fb pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha fb azimsulfuron 17.5 g/ha + bispyribac 25 g/ha (tank mixed) at 15 DAS fb 1 HW which resulted in improved growth and yield attributes and yield of rice. Amongst rice planting methods, conventional tillage normal spacing (R x R-18 cm) and conventional tillage paired row (9-27-9 cm) were able to compete with weeds more as compared to other rice planting methods resulting in lower weed density and weed biomass, enhanced rice growth and yield attributing characters and yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weeding followed by the stated herbicide and hand-weeding sequence significantly reduced weed density.

Treatment
two hand weeding fb pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha fb azimsulfuron 17.5 g/ha + bispyribac 25 g/ha (tank mixed) at 15 DAS fb 1 HWe0
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedInteractorComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significant reduction in weed density and biomass was recorded in two hand weeding fb pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha fb azimsulfuron 17.5 g/ha + bispyribac 25 g/ha (tank mixed) at 15 DAS fb 1 HW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same sequence significantly reduced weed biomass.

Treatment
two hand weeding fb pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha fb azimsulfuron 17.5 g/ha + bispyribac 25 g/ha (tank mixed) at 15 DAS fb 1 HWe0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significant reduction in weed density and biomass was recorded in two hand weeding fb pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha fb azimsulfuron 17.5 g/ha + bispyribac 25 g/ha (tank mixed) at 15 DAS fb 1 HW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The weed-management sequence improved rice growth, yield attributes and yield.

Treatment
two hand weeding fb pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha fb azimsulfuron 17.5 g/ha + bispyribac 25 g/ha (tank mixed) at 15 DAS fb 1 HWe1
Outcome
growth and yield attributes and yield of ricee0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“which resulted in improved growth and yield attributes and yield of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1215 · show in text ↑
e1

“two hand weeding fb pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha fb azimsulfuron 17.5 g/ha + bispyribac 25 g/ha (tank mixed) at 15 DAS fb 1 HW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage normal spacing competed more with weeds than other planting methods.

Treatment
conventional tillage normal spacing (R x R-18 cm)e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
compete with weedse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
other rice planting methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“conventional tillage normal spacing (R x R-18 cm) and conventional tillage paired row (9-27-9 cm) were able to compete with weeds more as compared to other rice planting methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1425 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage paired rows competed more with weeds than other planting methods.

Treatment
conventional tillage paired row (9-27-9 cm)e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
compete with weedse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
other rice planting methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“conventional tillage normal spacing (R x R-18 cm) and conventional tillage paired row (9-27-9 cm) were able to compete with weeds more as compared to other rice planting methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1425 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage normal spacing lowered weed density and weed biomass.

Treatment
conventional tillage normal spacing (R x R-18 cm)e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weed density and weed biomasse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
other rice planting methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“conventional tillage normal spacing (R x R-18 cm) and conventional tillage paired row (9-27-9 cm) were able to compete with weeds more as compared to other rice planting methods resulting in lower weed density and weed biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1474 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage paired rows lowered weed density and weed biomass.

Treatment
conventional tillage paired row (9-27-9 cm)e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weed density and weed biomasse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
other rice planting methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“conventional tillage normal spacing (R x R-18 cm) and conventional tillage paired row (9-27-9 cm) were able to compete with weeds more as compared to other rice planting methods resulting in lower weed density and weed biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1474 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage normal spacing enhanced rice growth, yield attributes and yield.

Treatment
conventional tillage normal spacing (R x R-18 cm)e0
Outcome
rice growth and yield attributing characters and yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
other rice planting methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“conventional tillage normal spacing (R x R-18 cm) and conventional tillage paired row (9-27-9 cm) were able to compete with weeds more as compared to other rice planting methods resulting in lower weed density and weed biomass, enhanced rice growth and yield attributing characters and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1539 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage paired rows enhanced rice growth, yield attributes and yield.

Treatment
conventional tillage paired row (9-27-9 cm)e0
Outcome
rice growth and yield attributing characters and yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
other rice planting methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“conventional tillage normal spacing (R x R-18 cm) and conventional tillage paired row (9-27-9 cm) were able to compete with weeds more as compared to other rice planting methods resulting in lower weed density and weed biomass, enhanced rice growth and yield attributing characters and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1539 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 21 positive, 4 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

bispyribac · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 31 positive, 3 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

azimsulfuron · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 35 positive, 5 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

pendimethalin · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

128 papers: 125 positive, 3 negative or no effect

124 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

124 papers more in this group

See all 128 papers →

pendimethalin · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

135 papers: 126 positive, 9 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

131 papers more in this group

See all 135 papers →

azimsulfuron · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
    Sesbania cover crop plus herbicides reduced weed dry weight relative to sunnhemp treatment.

    Effect of live mulches, cover crops and herbicides on weed flora, growth and yield of direct-seeded rice (Oryza sativa) · 2024 · compared with sunnhemp (Crotalaria juncea L.) cover crop fb bispyribac Na 25 g/ha + azimsulfuron 30 g/ha at 15 DAS

    Same direction

  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

bispyribac · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
    Sesbania cover crop plus herbicides reduced weed dry weight relative to sunnhemp treatment.

    Effect of live mulches, cover crops and herbicides on weed flora, growth and yield of direct-seeded rice (Oryza sativa) · 2024 · compared with sunnhemp (Crotalaria juncea L.) cover crop fb bispyribac Na 25 g/ha + azimsulfuron 30 g/ha at 15 DAS

    Same direction

  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

bispyribac · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

32 papers: 32 positive, 0 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

8 of 16 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.