Paper · 2021 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Evaluation of management practices against bollworms in cotton

SUMAN DEVI; PALA RAM; KRISHNA ROLANIA; et al.

7
claims
20
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Entomology Research Area, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar to evaluate the management practices, viz. use of botanical pesticides, Trichogramma chilonis (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) release and intercropping with sesame were evaluated alone and in different combination against spotted bollworm, Earias spp. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella Saunders (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in cotton during 2016-17. From investigation, it was concluded that all practices, either alone or in combinations, provided significantly better control of spotted bollworm and pink bollworm than the control. The results revealed that lowest incidence of spotted bollworm (10.09 and 8.10%) recorded in treatment T2 (Spinosad 45 SC @ 75 ml/acre) which was found at par with the treatment T3 (Spinosad 45 SC @ 75 ml/ acre alternated with nimbecidine) i.e. 10.13 and 9.14%, and T6 (Intercropping cotton with sesame + Release of T. chilonis adults alternated with nimbecidine) i.e. 10.14 and 8.41% during 2016-17, respectively. The Results on boll and locule basis, the significant lowest incidence of pink bollworm was recorded under treatment T2 (2.67 and 2.00%, 20.00 and 13.00%) and it was at par with T6 (2.89 and 2.53%; 21.33 and 14.36%) during 2016 and 2017, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Management practices alone or in combination gave significantly better control of spotted bollworm in cotton than the control.

Treatment
botanical pesticides, Trichogramma chilonis (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) release and intercropping with sesamee1
Interactor
Earias spp.Eariase1pest
Second interactor
Trichogramma chilonisTrichogramma chilonise1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
control of spotted bollworme2
Direction
bettere2
Qualifier
alone or in combinationse2
Comparator
the controle2
Setting
Entomology Research Area, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisare1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias
Earias · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryKyu3a · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichogramma chilonis
Trichogramma chilonis · Second interactorLin et al. (2023) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A field experiment was conducted at Entomology Research Area, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar to evaluate the management practices, viz. use of botanical pesticides, Trichogramma chilonis (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) release and intercropping with sesame were evaluated alone and in different combination against spotted bollworm, Earias spp. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella Saunders (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in cotton during 2016-17”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–487 · show in text ↑
e2

“all practices, either alone or in combinations, provided significantly better control of spotted bollworm and pink bollworm than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–671 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Management practices alone or in combination gave significantly better control of pink bollworm in cotton than the control.

Treatment
botanical pesticides, Trichogramma chilonis (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) release and intercropping with sesamee1
Interactor
Pectinophora gossypiellaPectinophora gossypiellae1pest
Second interactor
Trichogramma chilonisTrichogramma chilonise1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
pink bollworme2
Direction
bettere2
Qualifier
significantly better controle2
Comparator
the controle2
Setting
Entomology Research Area, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisare1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichogramma chilonis
Trichogramma chilonis · Second interactorLin et al. (2023) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A field experiment was conducted at Entomology Research Area, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar to evaluate the management practices, viz. use of botanical pesticides, Trichogramma chilonis (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) release and intercropping with sesame were evaluated alone and in different combination against spotted bollworm, Earias spp. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella Saunders (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in cotton during 2016-17”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–487 · show in text ↑
e2

“all practices, either alone or in combinations, provided significantly better control of spotted bollworm and pink bollworm than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–671 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad 45 SC at 75 ml/acre had the lowest spotted bollworm incidence, 10.09 and 8.10%.

Treatment
Spinosad 45 SC @ 75 ml/acree3
Interactor
Earias spp.Eariase1pest
Outcome
incidence of spotted bollworme3
Direction
loweste3
Value
10.09 and 8.10%e3
Comparator
the treatment T3e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias
Earias · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryKyu3a · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A field experiment was conducted at Entomology Research Area, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar to evaluate the management practices, viz. use of botanical pesticides, Trichogramma chilonis (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) release and intercropping with sesame were evaluated alone and in different combination against spotted bollworm, Earias spp. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella Saunders (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in cotton during 2016-17”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–487 · show in text ↑
e3

“lowest incidence of spotted bollworm (10.09 and 8.10%) recorded in treatment T2 (Spinosad 45 SC @ 75 ml/acre)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–808 · show in text ↑
e4

“found at par with the treatment T3 (Spinosad 45 SC @ 75 ml/ acre alternated with nimbecidine) i.e. 10.13 and 9.14%, and T6 (Intercropping cotton with sesame + Release of T. chilonis adults alternated with nimbecidine) i.e. 10.14 and 8.41%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–1057 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad 45 SC at 75 ml/ acre alternated with nimbecidine was at par with T2 for spotted bollworm incidence, 10.13 and 9.14%.

Treatment
Spinosad 45 SC @ 75 ml/ acre alternated with nimbecidinee4
Interactor
Earias spp.Eariase1pest
Outcome
incidence of spotted bollworme3
Direction
at pare4
Value
10.13 and 9.14%e4
Comparator
treatment T2e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias
Earias · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryKyu3a · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A field experiment was conducted at Entomology Research Area, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar to evaluate the management practices, viz. use of botanical pesticides, Trichogramma chilonis (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) release and intercropping with sesame were evaluated alone and in different combination against spotted bollworm, Earias spp. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella Saunders (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in cotton during 2016-17”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–487 · show in text ↑
e3

“lowest incidence of spotted bollworm (10.09 and 8.10%) recorded in treatment T2 (Spinosad 45 SC @ 75 ml/acre)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–808 · show in text ↑
e4

“found at par with the treatment T3 (Spinosad 45 SC @ 75 ml/ acre alternated with nimbecidine) i.e. 10.13 and 9.14%, and T6 (Intercropping cotton with sesame + Release of T. chilonis adults alternated with nimbecidine) i.e. 10.14 and 8.41%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–1057 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping cotton with sesame plus T. chilonis release alternated with nimbecidine was at par with T2 for spotted bollworm incidence, 10.14 and 8.41%.

Treatment
Intercropping cotton with sesame + Release of T. chilonis adults alternated with nimbecidinee4
Interactor
Earias spp.Eariase1pest
Outcome
incidence of spotted bollworme3
Direction
at pare4
Value
10.14 and 8.41%e4
Comparator
treatment T2e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias
Earias · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryKyu3a · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A field experiment was conducted at Entomology Research Area, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar to evaluate the management practices, viz. use of botanical pesticides, Trichogramma chilonis (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) release and intercropping with sesame were evaluated alone and in different combination against spotted bollworm, Earias spp. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella Saunders (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in cotton during 2016-17”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–487 · show in text ↑
e3

“lowest incidence of spotted bollworm (10.09 and 8.10%) recorded in treatment T2 (Spinosad 45 SC @ 75 ml/acre)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–808 · show in text ↑
e4

“found at par with the treatment T3 (Spinosad 45 SC @ 75 ml/ acre alternated with nimbecidine) i.e. 10.13 and 9.14%, and T6 (Intercropping cotton with sesame + Release of T. chilonis adults alternated with nimbecidine) i.e. 10.14 and 8.41%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–1057 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad 45 SC at 75 ml/acre had the lowest pink bollworm incidence, 2.67 and 2.00%.

Treatment
Spinosad 45 SC @ 75 ml/acree3
Interactor
Pectinophora gossypiellaPectinophora gossypiellae1pest
Outcome
incidence of pink bollworme6
Direction
loweste6
Value
2.67 and 2.00%, 20.00 and 13.00%e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A field experiment was conducted at Entomology Research Area, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar to evaluate the management practices, viz. use of botanical pesticides, Trichogramma chilonis (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) release and intercropping with sesame were evaluated alone and in different combination against spotted bollworm, Earias spp. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella Saunders (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in cotton during 2016-17”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–487 · show in text ↑
e3

“lowest incidence of spotted bollworm (10.09 and 8.10%) recorded in treatment T2 (Spinosad 45 SC @ 75 ml/acre)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–808 · show in text ↑
e6

“significant lowest incidence of pink bollworm was recorded under treatment T2 (2.67 and 2.00%, 20.00 and 13.00%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping cotton with sesame plus T. chilonis release alternated with nimbecidine was at par with T2 for pink bollworm incidence, 2.89 and 2.53%.

Treatment
Intercropping cotton with sesame + Release of T. chilonis adults alternated with nimbecidinee4
Interactor
Pectinophora gossypiellaPectinophora gossypiellae1pest
Outcome
incidence of pink bollworme6
Direction
at pare7
Value
2.89 and 2.53%; 21.33 and 14.36%e7
Comparator
treatment T2e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A field experiment was conducted at Entomology Research Area, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar to evaluate the management practices, viz. use of botanical pesticides, Trichogramma chilonis (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) release and intercropping with sesame were evaluated alone and in different combination against spotted bollworm, Earias spp. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella Saunders (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in cotton during 2016-17”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–487 · show in text ↑
e4

“found at par with the treatment T3 (Spinosad 45 SC @ 75 ml/ acre alternated with nimbecidine) i.e. 10.13 and 9.14%, and T6 (Intercropping cotton with sesame + Release of T. chilonis adults alternated with nimbecidine) i.e. 10.14 and 8.41%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–1057 · show in text ↑
e6

“significant lowest incidence of pink bollworm was recorded under treatment T2 (2.67 and 2.00%, 20.00 and 13.00%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1242 · show in text ↑
e7

“it was at par with T6 (2.89 and 2.53%; 21.33 and 14.36%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1303 · show in text ↑

spinosad · Earias · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

spinosad · Pectinophora gossypiella · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

botanical · Earias · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

botanical · Pectinophora gossypiella · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

insecticide · Pectinophora gossypiella · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 12 positive, 5 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.